More people friendly roads needed - AD
AD this morning spoke on the need to make roads and urban centres more people friendly.
Addressing a news conference on mobility, AD spokesman Arnold Cassola called for the creation of more pedestrian zones, especially in commercial areas and in village and town centres.
“At present the disregard for the needs of the most vulnerable people of our society, such as people with disabilities, ageing persons and parents with prams, is quite high.
“The lack of planning with regards to the positioning of street furniture, lamp-posts and signposts is sometimes impressive and this lack of planning is proving to be of real hindrance to the mobility of these categories,” he said.
Prof. Cassola said that the arrogance of the PN and the PL, who have illegally occupied Maltese roads and pavements with massive billboards for the past months, including placing some on ramps for disabled people, showed a strong lack of sensitivity for the needs of all Maltese citizens.
Spokesman Ralph Cassar said that urban centres and areas to which people commuted to and from work need more investment in mass transportation systems.
“We need public transport which connects all arterial roads which are clogged with traffic, especially in the morning. The heavy traffic from Bugibba through Mosta, Birkirkara to the University bypass and from Marsa, Marsascala and Fgura to Paola are especially problematic.
“The congestion from Rabat to Attard, Msida, Gzira and Sliema shows that there are routes which people use to commute for work which are not served well by public transport.”
Mr Cassar said that data to establish people’s travel patterns was needed and encouraging alternative and new modes of travel in urban areas were also a must.
13 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Paul Azzopardi
Oct 13th 2012, 18:23
The roads are terrible, not just in urban centres.
The system is based on roundabouts, and the first person on the RA has right of way, even if speeding irresponsibly. RAs should be camera monitored, or use timed traffic lights.
Lanes merge and are created without warning. Street markings fade and are not repainted. Multiple lanes feed the same small RA. Signs hidden behind trees etc.
Jean-Michel Azzopardi
Oct 13th 2012, 16:22
yes!!
simon galea
Oct 13th 2012, 15:11
Check the PL billboard at the coast road in Qawra/Salini (Kennedy Grove area) - blocking a pavement including ramp designed for push chairs and wheel chairs while resting on a couple of pavement bricks!!!!!! Health and safety at its best...... North Easterly wind can toss the billboard on some passing vehicle or pedestrian. The arrogance knows no limits. AD is the only party to raise such issues.
Antonio Anastasi
Oct 13th 2012, 14:48
Alternativa Democratica here is some food for thought.
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/22_benefits_208084_7.pdf
http://www.tdag.org.uk/uploads/4/2/8/0/4280686/tdag_treesinthetownscape.pdf.
This country has no polices to make our urban environments safer and greener. Our local and national governance is more concerned in removing trees creating unsafe and unhealthy urban areas.
Antonio Anastasi
Oct 13th 2012, 14:27
People friendly urban roads means tree lined streets. Research in the USA, Europe and Australia have shown that there are 22 benefits to trees in Urban areas.
Some of these benefits include a safer walking environment creating a well defined border for drivers shielding pedestrians from the eventuality of drivers making mistakes. Tree lined urban areas also encourage people to walk and exercise.
Mark Bugeja MD MMCFD
Oct 13th 2012, 14:08
What about our pavements?
Anthony Mizzi
Oct 13th 2012, 12:46
BEG to differ, it's planning that was needed and needed AND if needed consultants that are worth thier oats, not the ones commissioned by ARRIVA and getting paid thousands for fiascoes!
Those consultency fees should be refunded! If the Government was run like a Private Enterprise those consultants would not only not be paid but SUED!
Francis Sammut
Oct 13th 2012, 12:38
We need a third party to keep the two major ones on their toes. The two parties agree not to agree on havong the greens elected to Parliament. But that is to be expected. You see, they want to win all so they can ride roughshod over all and sundry and this government is doing! The PM, Austin Gatt and others in Cabinet, are a case in point.
Ramon Casha
Oct 13th 2012, 12:27
Why not go round Valletta and see how "pedestrianisation" worked out? People want to walk safely yes, but they also want to get from place to place.
As for the congestion from Rabat through Attard, as I already told Ralph this has been greatly worsened by the "crash barrier" placed at the narrowest part of the road, which transformed a 2-lane road into one lane.
Marco Galea
Oct 13th 2012, 12:07
what we need is less idiots driving!
Mr Victor Borg
Oct 13th 2012, 11:59
Sensible, progressive proposals are the fodder of AD, as usual, a party that deserves representation in parliament.
In my street, driving above the urban speed limit is the norm, and the streets are hazard for pedestrians.
anthony sultana
Oct 13th 2012, 11:43
We need a green voice in our parliment.Our roads in Gozo are like a rough sea,they will never be fix under the PN even in an other 100 years, they are going from worst to worst.GonziPN should compensate us for the damages that was caused by the rough roads on our cars.
R. Farrugia
Oct 14th 2012, 12:14
Be careful in what you wish, next time round you call on the towing service to replace a puncture, you might find him replacing it.... As if.
Please choose the reason of your report below: