Advert

Philippines may beat Malta to divorce law

Devotees flock to a church in the Philippines, Manila, during Lent. A draft law before the Filipino parliament takes the deeply Roman Catholic country’s values and traditions into consideration, according to one of the bill’s sponsors. Photo: Romeo Gacad/AFP

Devotees flock to a church in the Philippines, Manila, during Lent. A draft law before the Filipino parliament takes the deeply Roman Catholic country’s values and traditions into consideration, according to one of the bill’s sponsors. Photo: Romeo Gacad/AFP

A women’s political party in the Philippines yesterday urged the House of Representatives to take the country out of “the dark ages” and legalise divorce, just a day after Malta approved divorce legislation in a referendum.

The announcement was immediately met with criticism by Archbishop Emeritus Oscar Cruz and the Filipino Church, which warned the Bill would increase marital breakdown. The Church said the Philippines should not go down the “unfortunate” road taken by Malta.

Malta and the Philippines, both predominantly Catholic countries, remain the only two countries in the world which do not allow divorce.

The Filipino Congress yesterday said it would begin discussing the Bill tomorrow. Meanwhile, the Speaker announced his approval of the Bill and called for it to be passed through the necessary process.

Although the Bill is likely to be met by vehement opposition, there is a chance of it being approved in the Philippines before Malta’s Bill is officially enacted.

The Filipino divorce Bill, presented by the Gabriela party, allows couples to get divorced if they have been legally separated for two years. If they have only been living apart, they can obtain divorce after five years.

It also lists a number of grounds including violence, psychological incapacity, irreconcilable differences, abandonment or infidelity.

The divorce Bill was filed in July last year, only 20 days after Nationalist MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando did the same thing.

Unlike Dr Pullicino Orlando’s Bill, which was adapted from the Irish law introduced in 1997, the Filipino one was drawn up by a number of family lawyers and is tailored specifically to the country.

However, it has since been shelved, unlike in Malta, where the matter was put to a referendum.

Filipino politician Luzviminda Ilagan, one of the Bill’s sponsors, told The Times the Bill does not allow a no-fault divorce, as is being proposed in Malta.

“It was carefully crafted to take into consideration the Philippines’ values and traditions that give utmost importance to the way Filipinos appreciate the family as an institution. It takes into consideration religious beliefs existing in the Philippines. It will not allow couples to get married today and get divorced tomorrow,” she said, adding that similar Bills had been filed on numerous occasions. “We really cannot predict or dictate the process as the Catholic leadership also presents a strong opposition to the measure.”

Advert

4 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

R. Caruana

May 31st 2011, 18:55

It's over, a no-fault divorce will be introduced because that's what 53% of the populace voted for, deal with it.

Mr R.E. Saliba

Jun 1st 2011, 09:15

@R. Caruana
Danika wants a responsible divorce... absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Unless you have a different definition of 'no fault' in which case do enlighten us mortals so we'll know what you think we should deal with.

Advert
Advert