Advert

Updated: Pullicino Orlando backs opposition call for referendum debate tomorrow

Updated: 3.20 p.m.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Michael Frendo, this afternoon rejected an Opposition request for the debate on the holding of a divorce referendum to be held in the House tomorrow. However the Opposition insisted that a vote should be held.

Labour MP Joe Mizzi made the request.

He said that since no agreement on the date of the debate had been reached at a meeting of the House Business Committee, he was calling for the House to discuss the motion tomorrow, which, in terms of standing orders, is the day reserved for private business.

He accused the government of 'obstructing' and said that there was a clear majority in the House in favour of holding the debate tomorrow.

Mr Mizzi insisted that the unofficial seven-day notice period before business came before the House did not apply for private motions. And in any case, the Opposition had proposed holding the debate on Friday week, but the government disagreed.

Mr Mizzi requested a ruling from the Speaker and said that he was requesting a House vote on the adjournment ruling.

Foreign Minister Tonio Borg, Leader of the House said there were rulings which laid down that notice had to be given before a vote on the adjournment motion was moved. He insisted that the government wanted the motion to be discussed in the near future, but the procedure proposed by the Opposition had never been followed before.

Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando said there was consensus that a referendum should be called. The debate on the referendum was less contentious than the actual debate on the divorce bill, Dr Pullicino Orlando said, and he was therefore backing the Opposition call.

The Speaker, Michael Frendo, after adjourning the House to consider the request, ruled that the House Business Committee had not agreed on a programme of work which included tomorrow and, in terms of standing orders, the House had to meet on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesday. He therefore turned down the Opposition request.

Mr Mizzi said he was requesting a vote on the adjournment motion and he was moving that the House meets tomorrow.

Dr Borg said notice had to be given before a motion to amend the adjournment motion.

The sitting was again interrupted for the Speaker to consider his decision.

See also

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110216/local/government-cannot-give-date-on-divorce-referendum-debate-pn-group-still-to-discuss-it

Advert

58 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Dr Francis Saliba

Feb 18th 2011, 10:12

Yes - but only if the Prime Minister shows signs of pre-senile dementia. and there are no sign of that yet!

m spiteri

Feb 16th 2011, 20:48

...and 8 votes from my family.

Philip Hili

Feb 17th 2011, 01:14

From mine 70.

CCurmi

Feb 17th 2011, 05:28

and from my family he will gain 20votes! go on Jeff, you're the man

Anthony Borg

Feb 16th 2011, 21:41

Sur Zammit : you keep judging. WHO ARE YOU THEN ? DO NOT EVER JUDGE SO YOU WON'T BE JUDGED. And these are not my words ....................... !!!

Paul Barrett

Feb 17th 2011, 10:15

Wow - a new one, what is this "Back to the Future".

Divorce is a step forward. Progressive people back the divorce legislation following legal separation of marriage.

Divorce is a positive step. Progressive people back the freedom of choice.

Divorce is a big justice. Progressive people back the freedom to choose to apply for a divorce following legal separation which is justice according to free thinking people.

Divorce is to the benefit of all people. Progressive people back the divorce legislation which allows an optional second chance following legal separation of marriage which is good for one and all.

Join in the battle between free thinking people and the fundamentalists! Fight the good fight! The victory is ours, it's already guaranteed!

Philip Hili

Feb 17th 2011, 01:21

"The Maltese people are not stupid, and they value integrity in a politician."
Of course Maltese people are not stupid, and value the integrity in a politician, and how. Darba dahaq bina izda t-tieni darba MHUX SER JIDHAQ.
Min jidhaq l-ahhar jidhaq l-ahjar!!!!!!
Ghalhekk maghaggel, ghax diga' jaf li darba ohra ma jistax jiggilidha fil-parlament!!!!!ghax il-parlament BYE BYE.

Philip Hili

Feb 17th 2011, 01:33

"We saw you trying to convince weak backbenchers to vote in favour of you by visiting them in their own homes."
Dawn il-backbenchers ma hemmx posthom fil-partit. Hasbu, li qeghdin imexxu l-Amerika jew??
Xkupawhom minn gol-Partit ghax hsara iktar jaghmlu. Dawn hargu ghal-politika ghal-gwadann taghhom u mhux bhal ma jghidu - biex iservu lil-pajjiz!!!!
Jiffurmaw partit ghalihom, ha naraw kemm minnhom jarawh hemm fuq. Fl-imghoddi kien hemm min telaq mil-Partit u ifforma partit u sejjahlu "Partit Demokratiku Nazzjonalista". Nahseb l-istorjar kull min ghandu ftit taz-zmien jafha.

J Borg

Feb 16th 2011, 16:30

'Il-poplu mux tal-loghob.' Is marriage, then, something to play with? You choose your loved one one day, then opt for another, then.......

L.Cardona

Feb 16th 2011, 22:58

@ J Borg
U x'jigri minn dik il-parti li giet abbandunata? Nghidu li din percezzjoni u ndahhlu rasna fir-ramel? Jew inkunu umani bhal bqija tad-dinja u 'l din il-povra ntuha cans tibda hajja mill-gdid. Min jaf kieku int jew uliedek isibu ruhhom bla ma jridu f'sitwazzjoni difficcli tibqghax tghid l-istess.

Wilfred Camilleri

Feb 16th 2011, 18:16

And JPO should use this saga to put his career as a politician to rest. Oh and Joseph Muscat should this saga to put his career as leader of the PL to rest. And so on, and so on.....

L. Calleja

Feb 16th 2011, 16:37

X'ghandu x'jaqsma il-maggoranza fil-parlament fuq il-kwistjoni tad-divorzju meta diga ghandek membri miz-zewg nahat tal-kamra li lesti jivvutaw il-kontra ta' dak li qed jghidilhom il-partit kemm jekk id-dikjarazzjoni ta' l-amministrazzjoni tal-partiti saret fil-miftuh bhall PN jew dik ta' l-MLP li saret min taht u mhux pubblika.

axuereb

Feb 16th 2011, 16:08

few couples that are unhappy together.... how very insensitive of you! what about abusive marriages where women face beatings on a daily basis?

Joann Bugeja

Feb 16th 2011, 14:56

ppl like you always insult the govt because of obsession with power ! Mela what are YOU ppl of the opposition are doing !? You're all the time asking for the govt to resign and call an election..!! Incredible !

james borg

Feb 16th 2011, 15:31

@Joann Bugeja. I am sure you don't know me as I don't know you. But I assure you 100% that you are very wrong on your judgement. Explain to me please, what's left to happen after one loses work and bills are puring in the post? Don't you tell me to find another job, for the simple reasons of age plus the wages I am offered hardly make 50% of what I had. Honestly how would you cope with this situation? I'm not mentioning my pension, which is still calculated over the best consecutive 3 yrs out of the last 10 yrs. I still have 15 working yrs until I reach my Pension age. Are you by any chance being paid for commenting on TOM ?? Is there a chance you offer me a job with at least a decent salary? What am I gonna do when my children comes to pay their exams?? NO NO this is NOT what I've voted for. When we had a good leader things were much more different. And please don't blame it all on the international economic situation.

axuereb

Feb 16th 2011, 16:00

@ Joanne Bugeja: Jekk int komda, il-maggoranza tal-poplu m huwiex. Dan is-sinjur ghadu kemm tilef il-job filwaqt li l gvern ta qalbek ta zieda lilu nnifsu u l dawk ta madwaru ta 600 euro fil-gimgha.

R Sammut

Feb 16th 2011, 15:08

Dream on........

axuereb

Feb 16th 2011, 15:04

but sniping at each other about when (not even about whether) the great unwashed should be consulted, for all the world as if said great unwashed has the right to tell me or you or Joey down the road how to live our lives......

agree 100 %.

Joann Bugeja

Feb 16th 2011, 15:00

all that the opposition is interested in is simply not to co operate with the govt !

N.Grima

Feb 16th 2011, 15:22

Agreed completely. I actually think that holding a referendum before refining the Bill will result in it being rejected by the public. I for one, who am all out for divorce, have reservations on voting on something cloudy and unfinished. I am sure JPO put a lot of time and effort into the Bill, but the reason it should go through Parliament is to strengthen it even more! If one had to draw a parallel with the last referendum, it would be like holding a referendum on "Do you want Malta to be part of the EU?" and only then negotiate the entry package!! What if this package is all wrong and I voted Yes? What if the package was much better than expected but I had voted No?

axuereb

Feb 16th 2011, 16:06

@ Joanne Bugeja: OH u seem to live on another planet! remember when Dr Alfred Sant was PM? Did the PN ever co-operate on anything during those 22 months?
We are curious to see how much they will co-operate with Dr Muscat when he is elected prime minister in 2 years time!

C.Camilleri

Feb 16th 2011, 21:31

In case you have'nt noticed, it was JPO nationalists backbencher who put divorce on the parliament agenda.

J Farrugia

Feb 16th 2011, 21:13

Gonzi is not Sant. This issue of the divorce is just a defeatist tactic by the opposition to destroy the PN Government. But it will never succeed not with those members who were in the Mintoff KMB Cabinets still lurking in the shadows. Never again.

Advert
Advert