Advert

Muscat slams 'compromise at taxpayers' expense'

Updated - Adds Prime Minister's reply to Opposition leader's questions:

Opposition leader Joseph Muscat said this evening that the government was seeking a compromise at the people's expense on the issue of ministerial and MPs' pay.

Speaking in Parliament, Dr Muscat said a statement by the Prime Minister this evening about ministerial and MPs' pay was 30 months too late.

He said that although ministers would refund part of the honoraria they had been paid since 2008 (a total refund of €14,000), this only meant that they would still enjoy a double pay - the ministerial salary and the honorarium of €19,000 annually. Instead of a €600 increase a week, they would receive €500 a week.

This, he said, was a compromise the people would pay for.

The changes the prime minister had announced were merely motivated by fear that the government would lose a vote in the House.

Dr Muscat insisted that the Opposition never agreed with the increases. He himself, as Leader of the Opposition, was never told that he was to be paid his honorarium along with his salary as Leader of the Opposition.

It was unacceptable that in successive Budgets, the House voted on ministerial emoluments which did not reflect the actual financial package of the prime minister and the ministers.

How could the prime minister justify the fact that ministers were being paid their parliamentary honoraria from the funds allocated to their ministries? This was wrong and violated parliamentary procedure.

On the honoraria, the prime minister had now decided not to decide and was demanding a decision by the House Business Committee within a month.

Dr Muscat asked what right the prime minister had to set such a deadline for the committee after having hidden his own decisions for 30 months. This, he said, was arrogance.

He agreed that the honoraria of MPs had to be fair, but the decision could not be taken behind the people's backs, Dr Muscat said.

He disagreed that ministers should have a double pay. They should have a single package that, however was fair, he said.

Dr Muscat asked how the ministers would repay part of their honoraria and how that would work in the case of former ministers and speakers.

Noting an extract of Cabinet minutes, tabled by the prime minister, Dr Muscat noted that there was no reference to parliamentary assistants. These two were appointed in a compromise at the taxpayers' expense. How were they paid.

Dr Muscat said the Labour MPs had decided that they would all contribute from their honoraria to the fund which the Labour Party had set up. The decision was unanimously taken by secret vote.

He said the Labour MPs would discuss the honoraria in the House Committee as proposed by the prime minister. He rejected the deadline set by the prime minister and said the whole package of assistance given to MPs had to be discussed.

Replying, Dr Gonzi said the deadline could be shifted, but the situation could not continue for ever. The situation had reached this stage because no final decision was taken.

He insisted, as shown in the minutes of the House Welfare Committee that Opposition MPs had known about the increase in the honoraria and agreed with it. Indeed, some had complained that the increase in the honoraria had not yet been brought into force.

Dr Gonzi insisted that Dr Muscat simply could not continue to deny that he knew of the decision to raise the honorarium of MPs. He insisted once more that the fact that ministers were being given their salary and their honorarium as MPs only put them at the same level as all other MPs who served in the House and also had a job or profession.

The Prime Minister said the Opposition MPs had benefited the most when, six years ago, the government decided that civil servants who were elected to the House should retain their salary and their job and also pocket their honorarium as MPs. That was a double pay which the Labour Party had not criticised.

That ministers, as government employees, were now also being given a salary along with the honorarium was only the application of the same principle.

It also needed to be borne in mind that ministers and parliamentary secretaries were precluded form having any private work, something which did not apply to other people.

Dr Gonzi said he was shouldering his political responsibility for the decisions he had taken.

He had assumed in 2008 that the Opposition would agreed that the honoraria of mPs would be pegged at 70% of civil serviced pay scale one, from 50%. As a result, when the ministers started being given the honorarium, it was pegged at 70% of pay scale one.

Once there was no disagreement on the increase of the honoraria, the ministers would refund the increase - about €14,000 each after deducting tax. The ministers were thus at a par with the other MPs.

Dr Gonzi said the Budget estimates were correct. The ministerial salaries had not changed.

He agreed that the honoraria should be paid from Parliament's funds. Because agreement had not been reached yet, the honoraria had been paid from ministerial funds until the issue was settled. The money would be paid back as soon as possible, even though this could cause hardship for some people, Dr Gonzi said.

Dr Gonzi said the parliamentary assistants were not mentioned in the minutes he had tabled because in 2008, they had not been appointed yet. They were paid at the same rate as the chairmen of parliamentary committees. He thanked the parliamentary assistants for their work to the government.

Advert

94 Comments

Post comment

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

I M Dingli

Jan 20th 2011, 10:46

La trid taghmel paraguni bazwija habib, ha ntik paragun iehor jien..... dak iz-zmien ma kienx hemm dejn fuq ras il-poplu Malti filwaqt li illum il-gurnata hemm dejn ta l'fuq minn 4 biljun Euro. Dan isarraf f'dejn per capita ta madwar 10k Euro. Dak serhan il-mohh ux vera

Bid-dejn taghmel hafna affarijiet

N. Pace

Jan 21st 2011, 13:02

Dak iz-zmien ma kien hemm xejn - ghax hlief ghal erba bazuzli hadd ma kellu ghazla jew futur!

H. Psaila

Nov 16th 2011, 20:14

@IM Dingli - Veru li dak iz-zmien ma kienx hawn dejn pero konna minghajr dawl u ilma kwazi kuljum, jekk icempel fuq telefon taqbad ma xi tlieta ohra fuq linja wahda (dan trid tkun bazzulli biex tiehu linja tat-telefon), biex tiehu tv tal-kulur trid taghmel xi nofs tan-nhar fil-kju jew inkella thallas LM50 iktar. Veru konna qisna xi pajjiz Komunista. Veru taf taghmel paragun siehbi. Veru kien serhan il-mohh dak iz-zmien ghaliex hlief tkissir u glied ma kienx hawn.

J. Pace

Jan 17th, 00:56

@I M Dingli

Dak iz-zmien trrid tmur ghand il ministru biex tiehu xi haga wara li taghmillu hafna pjaciri - TV, Dawl, Ilma etc. Li ma sarx dak id-dejn llum ma ghandekx dak li tgawdi llum, kieku llum ghadna 30 sena lura, u bhal lum kieku bdejna nisimghu bl-internet u ovvjament jkunu banned bhal meta fi zmien Mintoff ma setghux jigu importati kompjuters!

Hallina King lanqas taf xinti tghid.


Xi zmiem ikrah gej ghal-Malta ghidli...Isa hej...

john vella

Jan 20th 2011, 12:09

Sur MAS My reply is not based on assumption, but what is fact, let me refer to your last part of your mail.
If ministerial job is so bad, why do we have THREE, I repeat THREE, generations of M.B. taking over from grandpa, to pa to son. By the way there are others in parliament who are doing nicely from father to son, surely their parents advice was taken into consideration.
As they say don't judge the book by the cover my friend!

Anthony Tabone

Jan 20th 2011, 09:36

Sorry, but I do not think that there is anybody worth voting for next election, whether it's Don Lawrence or Don Joseph.

G. Galea

Jan 20th 2011, 12:37

Dear I Fenech,

Whether you vote or not, a government is still going to be elected so might as well voice your opinion on the matter. It's not like if you don't vote the country will become an anarchy.

G. Galea

Jan 20th 2011, 12:38

@Anthony Tabone,

Whether you vote or not, a government is still going to be elected so might as well voice your opinion on the matter. It's not like if you don't vote the country will become an anarchy.

l fenech

Jan 20th 2011, 09:14

Dejjem l-istess marda kronika tal-PN, Gonzi jghaffeg u jzeffnu lill-labour.

lzammit

Jan 20th 2011, 09:30

Daz-zgur! Ghax il-passat tal-PL ikrah wisq. Min ghadda minnu ma jinsieh qatt.

Joseph Aquilina

Jan 20th 2011, 09:07

They did not say that. They said they will 'contribute' from their honoraria. I do not know if they will be made to say how much they contribute.

Muscat Pat

Jan 20th 2011, 08:27

If we pay GonziPN a lot of money and probably never see them again;its probably worth it!

Victor Vella

Jan 21st 2011, 16:45

Veru habib. Inhallu l-gvern tieghek jibqa` jkisser u jfarrak. Int tidher li m`intiex wiehed minn dawk li mhux milqut u mfarrak taht par idejn sodi li qerdu lil dan il-pajjiz? Jekk int ghaddej tajjeb taht dan ir-regim iswed nawguralek biex tibqa tiehu pjacir ghax ghad jigi zmien li tibki. Ibqa` ghoxa habib. Ghada jisbah ukoll.

Rodnick Abdilla

Jan 19th 2011, 21:34

Taf min dahak bin nies Frank dak li huwa ha paga straordinarja u ahna 1.16 cents mela dawn qed joqodu go pjaneta ohra ?

P. aGIUS

Jan 19th 2011, 21:50

Ghaziz joseph keiku ma tismax in net biss joseph muscat ilu jghid li irid jibdel il methodu ta kif jithalsu l-membri parlamentari mil bidu ta din is saga u l-froga li ghamel il Prim Ministru !!! Grow up tismax naha wahda !!!

u haga hra ghandek ragun ta mhux kif ried Joseph Muscat hareg ir rizultat tal meeting bejn l-MPs laburisti ...... IR-RIZULTAT HAREG BIC CAR LI L-MPS KOLLHA LABURISTA HUMA VERAMENT VICIN IL POPLU U KOLLHA KEMM HUMA MA QABLUX MA DAK LI HAWWAD IL PRIM MINISTRU --- (biex infakkrek l-MPs laburista kollha kemm HUMA ha jaghtu iz zieda KOLLHA u mux 365eur lil min vera ghandu bzonn )

d.magro

Jan 20th 2011, 06:31

Sur Sant, Il fatt jibqa li int u jien hadna Euro1.16 u siehbek Dr.Gonzi approva zieda esagerata lilu nnifsu u l-MP`s kollha. Dan hu zball kardinali li messa m`ghamel qatt. Minn jikmanda u jaghmel il-ligi ghamel l-izball. Dan hu fatt li hadd ma jistgha jmerih. Taqbel li Gonzipn kellu jaghti din iz-zieda ?

Mr Joseph Galea

Jun 10th 2011, 19:00

What are scumbles?

David Vassallo

Jan 19th 2011, 20:23

Mela oqghod hallas il-hajja dejjem tghola siehbi u l-mexxej daqstant tajjeb fl-opinjoni tieghek jiehu paga addizzjonali mal-paga propja tieghu aktar milli wisq probabli ghandek paga int. Jien bhalek kont nemmen imma id-darba li jmiss zgur nibdel il-partit li novvota ghax Gonzi bit-tieni paga u l-imghallem tieghi jtella' u jnizzel inaqqasx il-haddiema biex inaqqas l-ispejjez. IL-HMAR MHUX MIN HU BLA SKOLA IMMA MIN MA JRIDX JITGHALLEM.

D. Borg

Jan 19th 2011, 20:39

Kemm inti bravu

A. Brincat

Jan 19th 2011, 20:40

M'ghandux bzonn jikkonvincik. Ikkonvinca lil min irid jifhem li dan il gvern ta' Gonzi serqu u ghaddih biz-zmien.

Eric Camilleri

Jan 19th 2011, 20:47

Tahseb allura li l-Priministru bhalissa miexi sew?? Hekk weghdek qabel l-elezzjoni, u inti fejn taf xi jfisser Joseph Muscat meta ghadu qatt ma' mexxa l-pajjiz.

Meta taghddas rasek gor-ramel hekk tibqa tirraguna, biss meta tinduna li qieghd tizbalja jkun tard wisq u n-nies iwarbuk

Adrian Mizzi

Jan 19th 2011, 20:48

Well said! the government delivered the goods and met expectations (in certain industries even exceeded them - as in tourism, healthcare, education and growth in the private sector) thus they deserve the said honoraria. This payrise is nothing out of the ordinary when you compare it to what a manager and most professionals make nowadays.
What this country really needs are effective leaders and MPs who believe and manage to take the country to the next level. Believe me cheap/incapable MPs and leaders will cost the country more than the €500 a week price tag

Paul Borg

Jan 19th 2011, 21:08

Mexxi int sur Azzoppardi minflok tparlaw fil vojt bilqieghda quddiem it TV. Nippreferi immut bil-guh taht gvern li jipprova,milli taht gvern li jparla fuq krisi internazzjonali fejn jaqbillu u qatilna bil guh biex jibni parlament ta 80milljun li m'ghandniex bzonn u ma naffordjawx. Irridu Gvern li jinvesti fin nies mhux fi shabu ta madwaru kif ghamel tat Tunezia.

H Galea

Jan 20th 2011, 06:33

Mr Saliba, What Dr. Muscut is after are Voters, once in power he will have hurdles by the hundreds, will he be able to achive all that he has not yet promised. When Mintoff with all the power/supporters he faded away, so other world leaders. Let us not run before we know what lies ahead.

Adrian Cachia

Jan 19th 2011, 19:53

I agree with you.

And I have to add that during these times the pay rise could have waited for another year or two!

r spiteri

Jan 19th 2011, 19:33

Iz-zghazagh xoghol, edukazzjoni u sahha ahjar iridu u mhux Partit Laburista li jaghmel repeater class, inehhi l-istipendji, jibghathom jiddejnu u fuq kollox jinvesti f'fabbriki taz-zraben u l-imsiemer.

M. Mamo

Jan 19th 2011, 19:37

serju tant li kull meta saqsewh hux ha jtina l-istipendju jew iwaqqahhulna harab mill-mistoqsija!! u hallina trid

Nicky Azzopardi

Jan 19th 2011, 19:51

You are a fool to think Jospeh is the serious leader. Joseph Muscat is no leader, he isn't even his own team captain. He is driven on by the old PL motto of "throw mud at whatever you see or hear".

He proposes nothing. It is true that his job is still as Opposition leader, but constructive criticism includes COMPLIMENTING decisions with ideas and 'add-ons'.

Joseph on the other hand, is a true 'injorant' who fools you and another good 200,000 like you.

V Barbara

Jan 19th 2011, 20:26

It is a pity that certain people allow party-politics to divert their attention fom the real issues at stake here. I think Joseph Muscat and the Labour MPs have been quite clear and consistent with regards to this honoria business throughout the whole debate - I don't think Lawence Gonzi & his crew have acted fairly to decide matters behind the people's back, the same people they should be representing. The difference between the two leaders smacks you right in the face... you have to be really living in another dimension not to realise this.

Joe Micallef

Jan 19th 2011, 20:34

u sustanza ta dan id-duhan?

Frans Zammit

Jan 19th 2011, 22:40

Well said Mr Barbara! Let’s face it. The country’s financial situation is not good whatsoever, or, at least, we have to agree that it is no the - finanzi fis-sod – pictures said way back, and no €6/500 rise WEEKLY is definitely the National way forward. You simply cannot turn on your people to make them fasten their belt tighter and tighter and on the other hand you grant yourself such wages!
It’s an entire Monthly National Minimum Wage for some 3/4 persons’ family. Furthermore, you impose higher utilities bills, fuel, gas prices while other daily necessities are experiencing very sharp prices hikes, as bread and milk. As the English goes, we are dealing with “the bread and butter issues”.
To say that it’s due to international forces, it is to try to get with it in the easiest way out! Mr Micallef, In poor words, the difference is that GonziPN is acting only in favour of it’s interests and not the National one. Muscat could have stood silent and would have earned several more bucks weekly! But he did not, and that says it all!

bryan sullivan

Jan 19th 2011, 19:26

Slight correction. The Labour Party MP's are contributing FROM their honoraria and not their whole honoraria. which now begs the question of : "How much are they contributing ?" having said this i still disagree completely with the manner and extent of these increases !

Advert
Advert