Government rebuts Galdes claim
The Labour Party has accused Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi of wanting to take the planning authority’s place in the contentious issue of the power station extension.
Labour spokesman for planning Roderick Galdes issued a statement after Dr Gonzi wrote to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority saying it should not take a decision on an appeal by the Marsaxlokk council in connection with the BWSC application for a power station extension.
Mr Galdes said Dr Gonzi was for the first time applying the so-called ‘call-in procedure’ within the Planning Act for Cabinet to decide on the appeal.
This call-in procedure was being applied to one of the most controversial projects approved by Mepa, Mr Galdes said, adding there were doubts about the information given by Enemalta when the original application was quickly approved.
In a statement, the government said it was not stopping anybody’s right to appeal. On the contrary, the Appeals Board would listen to the case and make its recommendations to Cabinet.
“It is sad that a Labour MP, a Mepa employee, who is on the Mepa board and a Labour spokesman on the authority wrongly interprets the law,” the government said.
1 Comment
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Astrid Vella
Oct 17th 2010, 20:07
In fact this is not the first time this call-in procedure is being used, as Mr. Galdes thought. The same law is being invoked in the Appeal submitted by FAA re the Valletta Rehabilitation Project permit.
In fact the parallels between the two cases are very strong. While there is no doubt that the City Gate area needs upgrading, this has been pending for the last 60 years, so why such a scramble to get it all wound up within a couple of years, cutting out the legal process of public participation? It's not like the EU was breathing down our necks on the Valletta project? Could it be that an election is pressing?
Whatever the case, the first MEPA Appeal Board has withdrawn from the case (for valid reasons) and the Appeal will not get going before next January, by which time half the project will be ready, let alone by the time the Appeals board hands it over to Cabinet. A case of justice delayed is justice denied if ever there was one.