• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Church Commission awaits EIA on St John's museum development

'Let us not rush into any uninformed decision'

St John's Co-Cathedral. The proposed church yard development is arrowed.

The Church Commission on the Environment in a statement today about the proposed development of St John's Co-Cathedral Museum said today that the issue needs to be reviewed from a genuinely sustainable perspective by all quarters.

"The Commission feels that the next logical step is to await the publication of a truly objective Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) and for the open debate following it. While we appreciate what St John’s Co-Cathedral represents to most of us, we should do our best not to let our emotions cloud our reasoning, to the detriment of making the right and most sustainable choices in the long-term. Let us not rush into any uninformed decision."

St John’s Co-Cathedral Foundation has made two proposals for the extension of St. John`s Museum: underground halls beneath St John Street or the erection of structures and roofing of the church yard.

The Commission said that everyone agreed that the current space at St. John’s Co-Cathedral museum urgently needed to be improved both in terms of its physical extent and the quality of the museum environment.

The Commission pointed out that an EIA in itself was not meant to ensure that no impact would occur. An EIA should provide decision makers with an assessment of the significance of any impact(s) of the proposed extension so that they could objectively decide whether to go ahead with the proposal or not.

"On the other hand we cannot assume a priori and without the benefit of a complete and technically sound EIA, that any options being proposed are unacceptable. This does not imply that the question will be settled ‘only by the experts’. Sustainable development and sustainable choices require the active participation of an informed civil society including environmental NGOs."

The Commission said that if the extension project proposed by the Foundation was found to pose unreasonable risks (as identified through an EIA), then it stood to reason that one would have to look for additional space elsewhere.

"St. John’s Co-Cathedral is the heart of a whole living city that is in urgent need of regeneration, attention and support. Any proposal opted for should form part of a Valletta Master Plan which would encompass any future plans for the underground use of our Capital City (such as transport and water collection among others). Furthermore a close-working collaboration between the Cathedral’s Foundation and the Valletta Rehabilitation Committee will be essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of any proposals."

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Franco Farrugia (on 27/8/08)
What do eminent people within the Church have to say about the matter?

What about Msgr Vincent Borg, in charge of the Cathedral Museum in Valletta?
What about Fr Edgar Vella of Mgarr?
What about Fr Gino Gauci?

Do these people have a voice? Are they allowed to express themselves?

Or are people afraid of making the Church look as if it is divided over this issue?
What's wrong with disagreement of this issue, anyway?

Franco Farrugia (on 27/8/08)
Since when did the Church ever stand by EIAs???? Will the EIA take into account the spiritual richness of the graveyard of St John's?
DVella (on 27/8/08)
There is one million dollar question that nobody seems to be asking . . . WHY, in the name of all that is holy, is there this obsessional insistence on exhibiting the tapestries and the 200 chalices and all the other historical artefacts on a site specifically within the footprint of the St. Johns complex of buildings? Surely if it is so important that every single artefact is displayed (NOT a normal practice for ANY museum) a possibly more suitable venue can be found . . . After all, having the said artefacts housed in the same building (albeit a different part) is by no means going to relevive the pressure of thousands of visitors to St. John's itself. On the contrary . . . it is far more likely to increase it!!!
Francis Borg (on 27/8/08)
The Church Commision on the Environment was very objective in its statement. Many are rushing to conclusions without having the requisite qualifications to pontificate on the subject. The Commision has, to its credit , issued several statements on different subjects in the past which have shown no dependence on 'high ecclesiastical quarters'.
Marvin Mizzi (on 27/8/08)
This commission just shows the state of the Maltese Church today
(detached from reality, not hearing, and trying to erase our history
and heritage ) -- it is not just a matter of sustainability --
Valletta and St.John's Catheral are treasures and for such reason
have to remain intact. Changing anything on them would mean losing
irreplacable treasures. Image the The Vatican building an extenions
and covering the dome -- could it be sutainable --- but would it be
logical to do it. And it the Vatican I would presume the would
prefare more space to exhibit all their treasures. Let us not do the
mistakes of the past in Valletta and then regret the decision later
when it is to late.
Sergio Galea Vincenti (on 27/8/08)
Well... the Episcopal Commission on Catholic Patrimony - which is established in order to fulfill the Church's obligations and responsibilities in accordance with the Heritage Act - expressed itself negatively on the project when it was consulted by MEPA's Heritage Advisory Committee and this is according to what was reproduced in various public releases which until today have not been refuted.

In the light of this and in the light of today's statement by the Curia's Environment Commission, could someone please explain what the OFFICIAL position of the Church in Malta is on this proposal for St. John's?
Iris Azzopardi (on 27/8/08)
The Church is not a disinterested observer in this affair. Official Church representatives consitute half the Foundation's board, and apparently even the Chairman is a Church appointee.
One can hardly expect the Church Commission on the Environment to go against a decision already taken in high ecclesiastical quarters.
James Vella (on 27/8/08)
A voice of reason amid much gnashing of teeth. The Church's own environmental commission is calling for a rational, not an emotional or rushed campaign even before an EIA is held. Hope FAA now takes heed and awaits the results of the EIA, as the Church commission is saying, rather than try to rubbish the proposal at the very outset is at has been doing during these last few weeks.

Poll

Do you agree with the rebuilding of the Opera House site to house Parliament and a cultural centre?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku