Dog shows are ‘shows’ in that the magnificent, the unusual, the bizarre and the performers are all displayed in their sculptured finery. Selection of the best is usually based upon either of these two kinds of observation: aesthetic appeal or functional fitness as determined from a visual examination. In theory, the best exhibit of a functional breed should be selected on the basis of what is believed to be optimum form needed to efficiently execute its function. 

The observable clues, either in an exhibit’s build or its style of trotting, indicate that the exhibit is probably efficient in its function. 

The differences between a functionally correct style of travel and an aesthetically pleasing style of travel are seldom recognised by dog show enthusiasts. Available today are research findings performed to determine what constitutes efficient and effective animal locomotion, yet only fragments of it are known or quoted within the dog fancy. 

If dog showing is a fancy, as it is for many breeds, then no reason exists as to why exhibits should not be selected for a pleasing type of motion rather than an efficient motion.

It is no sin to require a dog to trot in a delightful, eye-appealing manner at a dog show; most of us enjoy it and approve. However, if a person thinks such artificial style of travelling is functionally efficient, his superficial knowledge of locomotion is exposed. Let us recognise each style for what it is.