Reference is being made to the article by Frank Salt in which he referred to Buġibba and Qawra as ‘slums’ (November 17).

Without taking away any of the respect the correspondent, a highly-respectable person in the real estate industry, enjoys, I truly fail to understand why, rather than addressing planning issues in Malta, the article ended up being a categorical attack on Qawra and Buġibba areas.

Planning efforts would have undoubtedly resulted in an environment that everyone could benefit from because of a higher quality of life. However, sticking to the planning argument, the article gives the impression that the “hodgepodge” situation lies only in Buġibba and Qawra whereas, unfortunately, it is found across the island.  Lack of parking, streetscaping, traffic and open public spaces, are these not of a concern in this country? Qawra and Buġibba areas have seen a substantial reduction in traffic density following the improved road infrastructure.

Buġibba was built in the 1960s and attracted tourists mainly because of the self-catering apartments and guesthouses. The Maltese had summer residences there. Qawra took more shape in the 1980s, allowing more planning and more modern development.

It is imperative that a clear distinction is made between the two localities in terms of development, which is very evident to those familiar with the area.

In contrast with the “decay” mentioned by Salt, most hotels and restaurants there have been refurbished, with millions of euros being spent to upgrade both the aesthetics and the service offered to tourists. We have also seen the construction of the national aquarium, which uplifted the area and attracted many tourists.

All of this has certainly upgraded the area to a holiday resort bustling with activity throughout the whole year. Hence, I find the term “decay” highly offensive to residents and tourists. It is also a disservice to all investors who really believe in the potential of these areas.

Kennedy Grove, which has also been called a “swamp”, was brought to life by providing play areas, open spaces, concrete footpaths, outdoor furniture, rubber matting and wooden gazebos. It is bliss for a family Sunday treat. I truly suggest Salt visit the park like many families do, including mine.

While I strongly agree there is room for improvement and more planning, I would gladly volunteer to be on the suggested committee to ensure that decisions made are in the best interest of the two localities and St Paul’s Bay.