It is still unclear whether the Nationalist Party's parliamentary group will be given a free vote when the motion asking government to withdraw its support for the underground museum proposed by the St John's Co-Cathedral Foundation is debated in Parliament today.
PN parliamentary whip David Agius yesterday was non-committal, insisting he could not say what was discussed in the parliamentary group. "You'll have to wait until tomorrow (today)," he said.
The PN is facing open dissent on the project with at least three MPs speaking against it.
It was the environmental group Flimkien Għal Ambjent Aħjar that first asked for MPs to be given a free vote on the matter.
On Sunday, PN general secretary Paul Borg Olivier refused to answer when asked whether the party would be giving its MPs a free vote.
He simply insisted that the Opposition Leader's motion had to be defeated because it was "dangerous" and could set an "ugly precedent" because it meant the government or Parliament could interfere with the process of allotting EU funds.
The motion, presented by Opposition Leader Joseph Muscat, calls on the government to "intervene immediately and withdraw its support for the project as proposed".
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi is expected to move an amendment to Dr Muscat's motion, which seeks to give a signal that, where necessary, Parliament should be able to scrutinise major or sensitive projects.
However, the amendment is also expected to emphasise the importance of not interfering with the planning processes and that such a project should be monitored by the planning authority.
Whether the amendment will be enough to allay fears of a mini rebellion among PN backbenchers still has to be seen.
Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, Jesmond Mugliett and Ninu Zammit have gone on record expressing disagreement with the proposed museum. The foundation wants to extend the co-cathedral's museum by excavating new exhibition space under the street and square in front of the cathedral.
The project was awarded almost €14 million in EU funds, which would be supplemented with another €2 million from the foundation's own money.
Even though the formal development application was submitted to the Malta Environment and Planning Authority in January 2008, the project had been on the cards for almost two years.
The minutes of Mepa's cultural heritage advisory committee of two separate meetings held in October 2006 and August 2007 highlight the dangers the excavation works could pose to the cathedral itself.
During the committee meeting held in 2007, the committee said that "any excavation in the immediate surroundings of the cathedral is extremely dangerous to the structural stability of the cathedral itself and the proposal is therefore not acceptable".
The committee also noted that the "sacred nature of the cemetery should be safeguarded and respected" insisting the proposed uses were not compatible with the important historical and religious nature of the site.
ksansone@timesofmalta.com