The apparent winners of the first round of Egypt’s landmark presidential vote reached out to rival candidates yesterday ahead of a June run-off, as international monitors describe the initial voting process as “encouraging.”
We face the risk of maintaining the Mubarak regime, or Islamising the country
Final votes were still being counted, but unofficial results suggested that the top two vote-getters out of twelve candidates were the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohammed Mursi and Ahmed Shafiq, a former prime minister under Hosni Mubarak.
On Friday night, the Brotherhood said it was seeking tocreate a coalition of forces to challenge Shafiq, reaching out to Mursi’s former rivals, including Abdel Moneim Abul Fotouh,who left the organisation to run for president.
“We call on all sincere political and national forces to unite to protect the revolution and to achieve the pledges we took before our great nation,” the Brotherhood said.
“The slogan now is: ‘the nation is in danger,’” Essam al-Erian, the deputy head of the Brotherhood’s political arm, told AFP.
The Brotherhood called a meeting of various candidates on Saturday afternoon, but the campaigns of Abul Fotouh, former foreign minister Amr Mussa and Nasserist candidate Hamdeen Sabbahi said the three men would not attend.
Shafiq also called for broad support from former rivals, calling on his competitors by name to join him, and promising there would be no return to the old regime. “I reach out to all the partners and I pledge that we would all work together for the good of Egypt,” he told a news conference yesterday.
Addressing the youth that spearheaded the 2011 revolt, he said: “your revolution has been hijacked and I am committed to bringing (it) back.”
“I pledge now, to all Egyptians, we shall start a new era. There is no going back.”
A Shafiq-Mursi run-off looks likely to further polarise anation that rose up against the authoritarian Mubarak 15 months ago but has since suffered endemic violence and a declining economy.
The contest presents a difficult choice for activists who led the revolt against Mubarak. For them, choosing Shafiq would be to admit the revolution had failed, but a vote for Mursi would threaten the very freedoms they fought for.
Independent analyst Hisham Kassem said the situation “is one of the most difficult political situations that Egypt has ever known.” “We face the risk of maintaining the Mubarakregime, or Islamising the country,” he told AFP.
Former US president Jimmy Carter, whose Carter Centre monitored the elections, told journalists yesterday that the process had been “encouraging” but noted that he and his monitors had faced unprecedented constraints.
“I would say that these (elections) have been encouraging to me,” he said, adding that authorities has imposed “constraints placed on us as witnessesthat have never been placed onus before.”
He said minor “haphazard” violations had been observed, but there did not appear to be systematic irregularities that favoured any one candidate.
The electoral commission is expected to declare the official results on Tuesday, but media tallies and Brotherhood figuresput Mursi in first place and Shafiq in second.
And Erian said Friday it was “completely clear” that Mursi and Shafiq had topped the presidential vote and would compete in the June 16-17 run-off.
He said Mursi had won 25.3 percent of the vote and Shafiq24 percent, with Sabbahi at22 percent.
Both Mursi and Shafiq had been written off as long shots just weeks before the historic election in which the country freely voted for the first time to elect a president after Mubarak’s ouster in a democratic uprising.