John Terry could yet face disciplinary action from the Football Association (FA) despite his acquittal on a racism charge, analysts said.

I would be surprised if there was no disciplinary action forthcoming. That’s not necessarily due to the racial element. There are other aspects the FA could look at, such as the manner of the players’ conduct.

Chelsea captain Terry was found not guilty of racially abusing rival player Anton Ferdinand at the end of a five-day trial at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on Friday.

But Simon Boyes, senior lecturer at Nottingham Law School, said the FA still had “wiggle room” to act against Terry and that, far from hindering them, a criminal trial could help their deliberations.

The trial related to an incident involving Terry and Queens Park Rangers defender Ferdinand during a Premier League match on October 23 last year.

Terry was stripped of the England captaincy in February over the allegations. As a consequence, Fabio Capello resigned as England manager, just months before England, defender Terry included, competed in Euro 2012.

Meanwhile the FA put their own disciplinary process on hold so as not to prejudice the trial.

But English football’s governing body reacted to Friday’s verdict by saying: “The FA notes the decision in the John Terry case and will now seek to conclude its own enquiries. The FA will make no further comment at this time.”

Boyes, author of the textbook Sports Law, said the FA needn’t be constrained by the court ruling.

“The Football Association have got quite a bit of wiggle room,” he told AFP.

“They have different charges – such as bringing the game into disrepute – which require a different standard of proof.

“It may well be the criminal trial is helpful to them as they can use the evidence from that,” he added.

With the court ruling in Terry’s favour, many of his supporters believe that should be the end of the matter.

But Boyes was not so sure.

“I would be surprised if there was no disciplinary action forthcoming. That’s not necessarily due to the racial element. There are other aspects the FA could look at, such as the manner of the players’ conduct.”

Meanwhile Lord Herman Ouseley, chairman of the Kick it Out campaign which seeks to eradicate racism from football, urged the FA to take its own action.

“There is only one regulatory body for football and it’s not the courts,” Ouseley told Sky Sports.

He added: “The FA would have already concluded its investigations and its processes had the courts not intervened through the police and the Crown Prosecution Service.

“Their prosecution and evidence was inadequate and John Terry was cleared of what he was charged on.”

Asked if the verdict could deter players who had been racially abused coming forward in future, Ouseley said: “There is evidence we know that players are reluctant to come forward and raise this issue.

“It impacts on their own performance on the field, it impacts on their relationship within the club. There is a culture in the dressing room which has to be tackled, people are very fearful and don’t come forward.

“We’ve got to work hard now to try and establish some credibility about the complaints’ processes to ensure they are dealt with properly.

“That means that in future the FA will have to carry out its own investigations irrespective of whether the police get involved.

“And I am afraid the police involvement in this case has not helped it whatsoever.”