An application was submitted to build an additional floor over an existing development which, at three storeys high, is at the maximum allowable height according to the local plans for the area in question.

Despite objections to this development, it has been recommended for approval with, among other reasons given in the DPA report, the following statement: “It should be noted that the proposal is not meant to increase the height of the approved building but to add roof structures to part of the approved building”. This is totally incorrect and, in my opinion, deliberately misleading.

The only area where such roof structures could be added is on the existing building, which is already at the maximum allowable height of three storeys. It is patently obvious that adding any structures will increase the building’s height.

Another reason given is that Policy and Design Guidance 2007 also states that, where the allowable height is three floors and above, a penthouse may be allowed to be built.

The specified allowable height is a maximum of three floors in compliance with the local area plans and the Malta Environment and Planning Authority’s development control policy.

I tried to make a written submission on this report but this is not allowed by Mepa regulations. The public appears to have little chance of questioning Mepa’s decisions.