Those who do not know us thought that there was a great chasm separating us; or worse still, a lot of animosity. There was nothing of the sort. Before proceeding further let me define the "us". I refer to some of the priests who wrote or commented to newspapers about conscience and divorce. These are the Rev Fathers Emanuel Agius; Anton Gouder, Peter Serracino Inglott, Joe Mizzi, Charlo' Camilleri, Alfred Micallef and I.

For the general public our positions seemed diametrically opposed. When we got together for the first meeting in mid-September, or thereabouts, it was immediately clear that this was not the case.

What happened can be best explained by the story of the elephant and the visually challenged group of men. One put his arms around the animal's legs and said that an elephant is like a column. Another one grabbed his tail and was adamant that an elephant is like a rope. The third one encountered the elephant while he was lying down and had no doubts that an elephant is like a robust wall. When they got together the picture of how an elephant really looks like emerged.

During our first meeting we had a frank and enlightened discussion. It was very clear that each of us had been emphasising some aspect of the whole question and that it should be very easy to unite these in one statement. Following that meeting, most sent their ideas to the facilitator of the meeting, Fr Arthur G Vella SJ. During the second meeting the basis of the common text emerged. Fr Vella graciously accepted to put flesh on the common ground and sent a draft statement.

E-mails are fantastic for such occasions. One tweaked a word a word here, another one changed something there and viola: a common position was in place. When one considers the way priest work I think that this common statement was produced to something akin to the speed of light.

I reproduce it here under.

13 October 2010

Declaration about Conscience and Divorce

We, the undersigned, have all written about the introduction of divorce in Malta. Sometimes, we may have seemed to contradict each other. So we decided to meet and clarify together our ideas on conscience and divorce and on what stand Christians could take regarding the proposed legislation favouring the introduction of divorce.

We all agreed on the following points:

1. All citizens, Catholic or not, if asked to give their judgement whether they wish or not the introduction of such a law in favour of divorce have the right and duty to follow their own conscience which needs, however, to be well informed and well formed, keeping in mind the common good.

2. Catholics should strive to have a Christian outlook on the family and on marriage and, according to the teaching of Christ and the Church, witness to this in all circumstances and to strive to see it practised in all structures of society.

3. Both as citizens as well as Catholics they should work hard so that in their country there should be stable and lasting marriages, strong families bound by love and fidelity because this is of great benefit to society at large.

4. For us, Catholics, divorce is wrong whether it is permitted by civil law or not.

5. The decision of every Catholic concerning legislation in favour of divorce in order for it to be a good and responsible decision must be reached with a formed conscience and enlightened by the teaching of Christ who is "the Way, the Truth and the Life."

6. The Catholic, who not caring about having an informed and formed conscience, decides to follow one's whim, without seriously paying attention to the teaching of God's Word and of the Church, but only follows one's feelings, one's own thoughts or personal advantage, if not also one's prejudices, should realise that one is not doing one's duty as a Catholic. One is responsible for such action before God and may possibly be sinning

7. In order that as Catholics we reach a good moral judgement whether we want or do not want the introduction of divorce law we must in a responsible manner form our conscience and then decide according to this conscience.

Therefore, after trying seriously to form one's conscience according to God's Word and the teaching of the Church and trying sincerely to discover the whole truth and what really leads to the common good, a Catholic:

a) may either reach a right decision or may also in all sincerity reach a decision which, in itself, is mistaken. But whatever the case, one is always obliged to follow and decide according to one's conscience,

b) may still, in spite of having all the necessary knowledge and having done everything to find the whole truth, in conscience not see why to vote against legislation favouring divorce. This one too has the right and the duty to follow what one's conscience tells one.

c) may also see that in this matter one is faced by the choice between two situations which both in themselves are harmful to the common good. It is legitimate, in this case of conflict, for one to choose the lesser evil after prayer, reflection and sincere search for the whole truth.

8. This declaration should calm all those who are worried that among us there might be differences regarding the teaching of the Church. This declaration is meant to throw light on the moral responsibility of every Maltese regarding their conscience and regarding the common good of society when they have to take a position about a possible proposal to legalise divorce in our country.

Rev Prog Emmanuel Agius, Dean of the Faculty of Theology.

Fr Joe Borg

Fr Charlo' Camilleri, O.Carm. Lecturer at the Faculty of Theology.

Mons Anton Gouder, Pro Vicar General.

Fr Alfred Micallef s.j.

Fr Joe Mizzi, Direttur tal-Moviment ta' Kana

Rev Prof Peter Serracino Inglott

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.