Blogs » Students' View

  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

The university collective (dis) agreement

This is the time when we students take sides. This is the time when we support the Academics' cause.

Government, UMASA and MUT have been at loggerheads over an issue which has taken way too long to solve. The situation in a nutshell is as follows: Academics, most of whom are well equipped with PhDs and valuable on-field experience, feel they are not getting enough and want more. The request is justifiable.

Despite being justified in asking for better conditions, the unions representing the academic staff took a wrong turning in June when they requested their members not to submit any exam result. The move was miscalculated because students were never properly informed on what was happening on the lecturers' side.

Six months after the June directive, students seem to be more aware that academics do have a point in what they're saying. This means that the unions stand a greater chance of obtaining backing from the student population than before.

However, we, students, need guarantees. We need to be made partners of a process of change gathering all stakeholders on campus. Together, we can achieve what others are procrastinating to deliver on.

We elected this ggovernment with a view of creating a Centre of Excellence in education by 2015, but, this same administration is still procrastinating in settling a collective agreement for the academic staff which is only making the risk of brain drain come true.

Facts speak volumes. In a report published last March by the World Economic Forum, Malta ranked 72 out of 134 countries in innovation, a far cry from a centre of excellence. Furthermore, Malta ranked 73rd in availability of scientists and engineers while Cyprus ranked 23rd.

Therefore, can we afford losing innovators who already live here? Shouldn't the ggovernment be providing a more lucrative package attracting more researchers to settle and work here?

The university is a place of research and tuition. Given the lack of research centers in Malta, it is the only place where proper research can be carried out.

Higher education is at the moment just like City Gate – a big, shabby construct obstructing the beauty of knowledge. Our higher education is in desperate need of capital investment: not only in terms of brick and mortar investments but also in human capital.

A new collective agreement for academic staff is just a first step in the direction of a complete overhaul of the higher educational system in Malta.

As main users of the system, we, students, are all well aware that our university, rather than providing a challenging experience, is currently structurally challenged. This is an opportunity to give our University new impetus.

We should start by showing solidarity to the cause of the academic staff, yet demanding that measurable commitments for the provision of higher quality education are made.

We can be the spark that makes Tonio Fenech render to Ceaser the things that are Caesar's and to Victor what's Victor's.

Matthew Mizzi is a fourth year Law student and is Chief Executive Officer of Insite – The Student Media Organisation. www.insiteronline.com

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Keith Muscat (on 6/1/09)
the lecturers want more money?!?! half of them provide private tuition without declaring their profits....that is fair??!

OUR EDUCATION SHOULD NOT BE A BARGAINING TOOL! ! !
STUDENTS RISE UP!!
A. Briffa (on 5/1/09)
@ Angelo

Had it given lecturers their promised wages, we wouldnt have such problems.
Julian Cassar (on 4/1/09)
Mr Micallef, so it is not in the interest of students to see that lecturers are well paid?

Mr Micallef, you come from SDM. Is it a mere coincidence that you are once again taking the government's position?
Angelo Micallef (on 29/12/08)
Yet again it seems Matthew Mizzi simply fails to understand that he, like all other students is being held hostage by the very body he has chosen to take the side of! This isn't a matter of taking sides with UMASA/MUT or against UMASA/MUT; at root both sides have a point in their own way.

This is simply about being caught in the cross fire.
Robert Zammit (on 26/12/08)
Good blog, Matt. I've not studies at the University of Malta for a year and a half, now, but if things haven't changed much, I would agree with you that UoM is very much in need of a (well-thought out) capital injection.

Going by way of the old top-down funding formula, however - with government injecting, and university subsequently producing - does favours to no one, particularly the student body. The relationship between capital injections and good research does not flow in one direction. The phrase 'publish or perish' comes to mind at this point; ask any British university lecturer who has had to produce good quality research just to merit his/her position (let alone hold on to it).

Capital injections are sorely needed - granted. They may (rightly) come with strings attached, though; a not-so-gentle reminder that profressors are - theoretically - researchers first, and then lecturers; and not the other way round, as they seem to be in Malta.
rene joseph (on 26/12/08)
oh, come on. KSU is formed by students of the SDM - they will never lift a finger against a PN government.

It is about time to have an independent body that truly represents the students.

Andrew Martinelli (on 21/12/08)
KSU? Dream on.

A useless waste of partisan politics on campus if you ask me, KSU have never shown any backbone at all in my four years at university.

And for those ready to defend and idolize KSU, PLEASE don't give me the parking crap.
Andrew Camilleri (on 19/12/08)
It would be interesting to know what was the KSU's role throughout the whole negotiation process. I believe that KSU should have been an integral part of the talks especially since students are going to be affected by the measures at hand.

Elisa Borg (on 18/12/08)
The lecturers were 'nice' last June - they lifted the directive before it did any harm. But look where being nice got them.

Threats seem to be the only way to deal with government. I wish the strike wasn't such an inconvenience to us, but I realise that it's the lecturers' only way.

I look forward to the day when all my lecturers will be proud of their work and happy to come to Uni every day and give their best to us.

I look forward to the day when full-time lecturers stop being a rare bird in our University.

I look forward to the day when lecturer misbehaviour is no longer excusable by their miserable work conditions, but can be dealt with firmly and efficiently.

All posts

Poll

Do you agree with the European Court decision on the removal of Crucifixes from classrooms?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku