Blogs » Students' View

  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

First Ladies

With the November US elections looming and the polls indicating that this election will be very close to call, many people are questioning whether America’s fate lies in the perfectly manicured hands of the maybe first lady. Will one of them be able to tip the scales?

Cindy McCain appears to have the perfect, white picket fence life. Yet standing next to her husband in a gown worth thousands with a faraway look in her eyes, one really does wonder if she has it all. To many a cynical eye she looks like the proverbial poor little rich girl that never grew up. Cindy was extremely reluctant to get her family involved in the presidential rat race. When her husband became senator, she refused to follow him to Washington and opted to stay at home in the hopes of raising her children with the same values that she held dear.

Throughout the entire campaign Cindy McCain has taken the back seat and behaved like the perfect businessman’s wife, pearls and all. Despite her unwillingness to get involved, or maybe because of it, I can’t help but root for her. She is a woman who is putting her husband’s dreams before her own, but that doesn’t want a share in the limelight.

Not so for the ballsy Michelle Obama who could not be more different. Michelle comes from what can only be stereotypically described as the typical, white, working class, American family, only she is Afro-American. In her thesis about being coloured she wrote; “My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my “blackness” than ever before.” Many believe that she is the power house behind Obama’s presidential campaign: her energy is notoriously boundless and she leaves nothing to chance. It has been reported that Barack’s campaigners have worried on more than one occasion that her straight-talking, no nonsense approach will be her husband’s downfall.

Watching a speech given by her I can’t help but wonder if she is the one running for President and not her husband. After all, this woman who was a senior at a law firm in Chicago whilst Barack was a newcomer, is no stranger to ambition and although the image consultants have clearly been at work trying to soften her image there is no getting away from the fact that underneath the plaid, gingham dress from Gap lies a hard as nails interior. This is a ruthless woman who has made her own rules in a man’s world.

Someone once said: show me a man’s car, house and wife and I will tell you everything about him. Maybe it is important that America paid attention to this age old adage. Whilst it is vital that the world raises strong women that are able to air their opinions and take an active part in politics shoulder to shoulder with their male counterparts, surely if America wanted a female President they would have voted for Hillary?

Anna Marie Galea is a third year Law student at the University of Malta. She is a member of Insite – The Student Media Organisation – www.insite.org.mt

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Christopher Grech (on 29/9/08)
I do not even think that there will be a November election this year in the US.

Bush will suspend the elections over economic crisis that the New World Order has planned for all humans on earth. Sounds like a fantasy story? I am putting this blog in advance so that nobody can say that I did not state it.

The so called democracy in the US is simply not there. Just because there is a choice of two parties does not make it a choice. These candidates are already chosen by the ultra rich bankers who control the world. To control the country, all you have to do is to control the match (just like football).

In order to win, you must control both sides, and these banksters do.

Want to know more about who is controlling the world?

If so visit: http://jahtruth.net/illumin.htm
......, your life would never be the same again.

Nemo in "The Matrix", swallowed one pill, in order to know the hard truth.

So in reality, no choice. What did the previous parties cry for in 2004?: less taxes and less war. The result: More taxes and more war! Time to wake up.
Lisa Said (on 21/9/08)
However someone like Hillary influenced a lot of Bill's decisions and I'm pretty sure that someone with a strong character like Michelle will influence the way her husband governs - therefore it is important to give 'some' importance to the wives. I'm not saying the entire campaign should be based on the wives but I wouldnt overlook them either.
R. Briffa (on 20/9/08)
Michelle Obama has also stated that she was reluctant about her husband's candidacy, because of the great exposure that the presidential campaign would bring to her family - to her children in particular. Both Cindy and Michelle have raised their children in their own ways as they each saw fit. To judge the candidates by their wives should not be the priority. The most important thing is their policy-making and their decisions once they are put in the Oval Office.
Brian Spleenovich (on 20/9/08)
@Michelle Said But it's not like people think like that. Hilary Clinton whould of played up that she was a woman, and to some extent she did. A load of Americans won't vote for Obama because he's black. No, no one should discriminate on sex or colour in things like politics, but it will always go on. So people need to play this prejudice to their own advantages - to others' disadvantages.
michelle said (on 20/9/08)
you shouldnt vote for someone just because they're a woman. I would like to see a female president but that doesnt mean I want to see a female president more than i want to see someone qualified to run this country elected. It's insulting to Hillary and any other female candidates to suggest that people are going to vote for them based on theirsex, rather than your other credentials.

I think a more pertinent point would be that their choice of female candidates was one lone woman. What we need to change in the political sphere is the number of women participating rather than peoples faith in women to do the job.
Brian Spleenovich (on 17/9/08)
This is honestly the best opinion blog that has come out of the students' blog section for a long time. It is one of the only political pieces which has a hint of two sides of the story. A.Galea has shown the rest of you how to write: She has criticised both branches of her argument, and she has sided with one. She has not focused on her opinion, no, she has gone the step to prove it. "Your opinion is worthless unless you can prove it" (Stephen Daughton) and hers is not worthless, like what some of the other writers of this blog produce: a one sided argument, with no other side to lean on.

May I just say that I think it's the two men who will be elected, I don't think there is a single American who focus on the men's wives. It is not something that is generally thought of before an election, however we can see the shtick British Prime minister Tony Blair got about his over pretentious blabber-mouthed wife, Cherrie Blair, also a lawyer.
Even more ironic; the author of this blog will become a lawyer one day!

All posts

Poll

Is the new vehicle circulation tax fair?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku