Blogs » Andrew Borg Cardona

  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

WOOF, GOOD PUPPY

I really should stop doing this. It’s becoming a bit too much like taking candy from babies and I’m almost starting to feel guilty.

Assiduous students of the language, within the ranks of whom Lil’Elves don’t militate, will have noticed that I employed the word “almost” in qualifying the guilt I feel and the extent thereof. Since I’m only almost starting to feel guilty, I’m not yet feeling it to any significant extent, so I won’t stop, just yet.

What it is that I’m on about, incidentally, is the way I dangle tasty morsels in front of the gaping mouths of the Lil’Elves, the vast majority of whom zoom up for all the world like the enormous gobies that they are. If they weren’t gobies, they wouldn’t stick up for things like Mintoff and if they weren’t gobies, they wouldn’t fall for my jibes, every time.

Just so you’ll know, incidentally, a goby is a mazzun, the Maltese name for a fish that is reputed to be dead easy to hook. A bit like piscine versions of the renowned Pavlovian mutt, if you see what I mean, it rises to the bait with the alacrity of, well, a Lil’Elf defending the indefensible.

I’m starting to behave, I sometimes think, like a cheap comic, who knows precisely which buttons to push in order to get an easy laugh. You know what I mean: if I want to get people writing in, I make a silly crack about the hysterically funny juxtaposition of hunting and conservation, guaranteed to get the hunting fraternity up in arms, telling me that I’m a fool and a sartorially challenged one at that.

Some real fun can be had when I lift up the stone to expose the slimy little racists that squirm underneath. Here it’s virtually written in stone that I’ll get insulting emails and be told that I’m sticking up for criminals and all manner of guff, none of which obscures the basic tenet of my position: the fact that the country has a problem which the EU is doing precious little (from what we can see) to help solve does not absolve us from the basic obligations of common decency.

This sentiment, of course, offends all the WASCS (white Anglo-Saxon Catholics) who ignore the fact that they’re hardly white (not that this makes a difference) and certainly not Catholics.

Other gobies that rise to the bait are the assorted tree-huggers and muesli-munchers who seem to delight in objecting to everything all the time. You know the ones I mean, the ones who seem to have more time on their hands than is sensible. People with limited time prioritise and raise hell when it’s really necessary. We need a national conscience when it comes to preventing the rape of our cultural heritage, don’t get me wrong, but a bit of stopping to smell the roses might be called for sometimes.

While on the subject of NIMBYism, which very often gets itself intertwined into this subject, there’s a petition going the rounds at the moment not a million miles from where I live about some antenna or something that is being erected on some building or other. One of the reasons for the objections, apparently, is aesthetic, which is where MEPA and the owner of the site should be locking horns, without the need for petitions, while another seems to be based on the fact that the people who want this antenna put up haven’t proved that it’s not dangerous to human health.

I find this latter argument NIMBYistic in the extreme.

Why haven’t the people campaigning under this flag been campaigning against antennas all over the place, instead of only coming out of the woodwork now that it’s in their neighbourhood? And that’s quite apart from the fact that the scientific evidence is that there is no danger to health. True, you can’t prove an absolute negative, as any scientist worth his or her salt knows, so it’s easy for this particular brand of nay-sayer to make the specious argument, but the fact is, if this particular antenna is harmful to our health, every other one is, so the argument should be “let’s ban all antennas”.

Which is utter tosh and why, even if I’m asked, I won’t be signing.

Getting back to the school of gobies with which I’ve been having a bit of fun all summer, a whole army of them has swum into view. It seems it’s time to start with the weird plastic foetuses again, as the campaign to entrench the unborn child’s right to life in the Constitution is re-starting.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, I am not in favour of abortion but these people are going to drive me that way at this rate. Can’t they get the message once and for all? Anti-abortion laws are fine the way they are, there’s no need to mess around with the Constitution, especially with what might very well turn out to be quite woolly thinking.

Time for another poke at another sacred idol: the Lil’Elves have been oh-so-pleased with themselves since Joe Muscat took over from Alfred Sant. You’d think that his triumphal entry into the Glass House up Mile End way had been akin to being carried shoulder high into Castille, instead of being a completely internal event for the Labour Party.

It will become a national event when he takes on the role of Leader of the Opposition, but in the meantime, he’s of interest as LoP in waiting, as it were, but for all intents and purposes, he’s a bit of a lame duck. He’s been making a lot of noise, as behoves someone who will be Constitutionally bound to make it, but has it been a bit like a faulty air-conditioner, one has to ask one’s self? Noise producing nothing of great value, I mean?

For instance, he’s kick-started, so his fans tell us, the debate on whether we should have divorce in Malta. The thing is, the mere fact that he’s said that there has to be a debate is evidence of failure to appreciate that there’s no real reason for a debate to be had: divorce should have been introduced long ago and it’s only slavish adherence to the antiquated notion that organised religion is allowed to have a say in secular policies that makes a “debate” apparently necessary.

The Nationalist Party is as guilty of kow-towing to the Church Organised as the MLP, I make no bones about saying, and both of them do this because they’re soiling their pants at the thought that votes might be lost, horror of horrors.

So there you have it: Mintoffians, hunters, racists, nimbyists, tree-huggers, Right-to-Lifers, Labourites, the Curia and the Nationalists, all offended in less than 1200 words. You must admit, I’m good. Go on, admit it, you know you want to.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Stephen Farrugia (on 21/9/08)
@K Cassar

Replacing the Maltese people in their own country is racist against the Maltese.
Kenneth Cassar (on 19/9/08)
Take a look at this: http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20080919/letters/colour-is-not-an-issue

Apparently, according to some enlightened co-"patriots", writing "Blacks Out" on a wall is not racist!

Incredible! And they fear that we will lose our "culture". If our culture is epitomised by such warped thinking, good riddance to it.
CJohn Zammit (on 18/9/08)
Dr. ABC's article is good fun, but it doesn't solve problems.

1) Illegal immigration: Don't expect the EU to solve this problem. It is Malta's problem and it is incumbent on Malta's leaders -- Dr. ABC included -- to propose a solution. (They may have to consider something akin to the Underground Railroad for freeing slaves in 19th century America.)

2) Antenna: If this antenna is a broadcasting antenna, atop a high tower, then it can be a real health hazard. Civilized countries have stringent regulations regarding the design, installation, and operation of such antennas.

3)Abortion: Malta's abortion laws are not "fine the way they are"; they are in direct conflict with Malta's Constitution - Chapter IV, Article 32.

These laws should be struck down.

4) Divorce: Malta's Marriage Act -- unique in the world -- not only specifies the requirements for a valid marriage, it also includes, in Article 19, the grounds for Annulment (straight out of Canon Law).

As interpreted and applied by the Civil Court (Family Section), as recently as July 25th, Article 19 is, in fact, a substitute for Divorce legislation.

(I suggest to those seeking Divorce, to contact a competent lawyer to file for Annulment.)
henriette pace (on 18/9/08)
Il-lallu, M Muscat, lollipops are for licking but who'd want to lick a LoP even if he's waiting ?
M Muscat (on 18/9/08)
Oh! I thought LoP was short for LollipoP.
Ethelbert Schembri (on 18/9/08)
Yes Dr A.B.C good article , but you sound like you are trying to be politically correct I hope you’re not losing the touch you famous with !

Please don’t try to offend the PN it feels so unnatural for you . Again please continue your attacks on the Lil’Elves you are so funny when you do it with all your force .

Thanks and keep them coming !!

Signed by a Lil’Elve that likes your style and is honoured buy your comments !
martin portelli (on 18/9/08)
‘Assiduous students of the language’ do note how ABC mobilises Edwardian Minglish and sends it limping into Blog battle with archaic gusto.
Ivan Attard (on 18/9/08)
Pure and unrestrained waste of space.
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 18/9/08)
At least someone is paying attention! You're right, Henriette Pace, it should have been LOO-in-waiting, cioe' Leader Of the Opposition. My blooper.
Chris Borg (on 18/9/08)
EFA didn't just get a poodle....they also gave him a kennel for it :D It even had "sunshine" written on it...EFA is such a hero down under, they even wrote the poodle's name on its kennel
I. M. Dingli (on 18/9/08)
Yes Antoine, a poodle like the one EFA brought from his trip to Australia when he was a PM.
Ivan Grech Mintoff (on 18/9/08)
>Do you mean....like a poodle?

Hahahaha!

I liked that ! :)

(Purely for mirth's sake...)

What was the dog the (better red than dead - remember??) chinese gave to efa on his THIRD (useless) visit to China....??

:)




Antoine Vella (on 18/9/08)
Ivan Grech Mintoff:
"a) To be a dog that barks when treated like an idiot...
b) or one with a pretty bow tie on its head that comes skimpering as fast as its little paws can carry it , when the Master's voice beckons...?"

Do you mean....like a poodle?
Guzeppi Grech (on 18/9/08)
ABC, you're right, they really are pathetic lemmings.
Ivan Grech Mintoff (on 18/9/08)
Again, I ask.

What's better?

a) To be a dog that barks when treated like an idiot...

b) or one with a pretty bow tie on its head that comes skimpering as fast as its little paws can carry it , when the Master's voice beckons...? (The dog then being utterly content with the 'scraps' thrown down from the Master's table)

And just to show we're still 'ahead' (your phrase!), the Lil'Elves predict that next installment will include..... wait for the drum roll to finish.....

1) Belittle Muscat:
2) Attack those who dare disagree with (kiss kiss)GonziPN:
3) Mention the Devil incarnate:
4) a mention of the dark ages too.... (see above!) wow! - double TICK! for effort.....
5) Attempt to thwart an issue SERIOUSLY effecting Malta TODAY by making a joke(?) out of it & thereby taking pressure off (brownKissKiss) GonziPN...


Woof?!!

Actually, a mere whimpering is all I hear from that side of the table from which the Faithful Fidos are fed.....

We await for the next 'Blog' (SIC!) with baited breath.... (not)
Kenneth Cassar (on 18/9/08)
@ K Pullicino:

You miss a very important point - that even if we had no constitution at all, our laws still make abortion illegal, with no room for misinterpretation.
henriette pace (on 17/9/08)
What is a LoP in waiting? waiting for what?
Antoine Vella (on 17/9/08)
Stephen Farrugia

"Bastille has fallen."

Never mind the Bastille, what about Castille? Wasn't there supposed to be a Harvard-trained genius in office? That's what the MLP was promising you this time last year. Insomma, you know how it is with Labour: they never keep their promises. Drajnihom.
K. Pullicino (on 17/9/08)
"Anti-abortion laws are fine the way they are, there’s no need to mess around with the Constitution, especially with what might very well turn out to be quite woolly thinking.
There would be no need."

There would be no need to "mess around with the Constitution" if there weren't the handful of people that still can't realise that an embryo is a human being (since technically the Constitution already gives the right of life to all human beings). But unfortunately, a right so important as this should get itself into the Constitution as accurately as possible to prevent "misinterpretations". After all, abortion is practiced widely in countries where no one is allowed to kill anyone else by the Constitution.

Also, I'm pretty sure that there will be so many people here that will be capable of offending you... in less than 200 words. :P
Kenneth Cassar (on 17/9/08)
Has anyone realized that the more people rant and rave, the more ABC will write what annoys you most? Isn't that the intended meaning of the title of this blog?

Sorry ABC...maybe I've blown your cover...or maybe not ;)
d.attard (on 17/9/08)
an inexhaustible supply of salt methodically rubbed in so many wounds of so many people having such diverse backgrounds! Lil'elves yearning for a dab of honey which will help soothe their festering sores...depicts, in my opinion, a scene of extreme cruelty irrespective of who the 'victim', or Lil'elves as you call them, may be.

But hey, if 'sadistic' metaphors are up your street, then so be it. I have seen worse.
Kenneth Cassar (on 17/9/08)
Yes, Andrew Borg-Cardona, you have been beaten, and so has Fr Borg apparently. A few incoherent words from self-proclaimed "ideologues" work wonders ;)
Stephen Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
Had enough fun. Keep up the good work and don't give ABC such a hard time, what would the Times be without him ?!!

My last post.

Stoneworks
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 17/9/08)
Stephen Farrugia, if at all possible, and in a coherent manner, can you explain how, when and why I have been beaten? My column and my blog are going strong and my every word is pounced on by people like you to promote their ideologies, abhorrent though such ideologies may be to reasonable people.

Oh well, I suppose I'm beaten..... not.
Stephen Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
@ Chris Borg

Let it be known in history that ABC has been beaten, just when he was about to retire and claim victory. Is-sewwa jerbah zgur! (EFA)

Stoneworks- lol
Chris Borg (on 17/9/08)
@ Stephem Farrugia...do keep in mind that the bocca might have problems with understanding...miskin :S
Etienne Dingli (on 17/9/08)
I thought Priscilla's remark was kinda funny because ABC like to jump blogs too, he's in daphne's as well. Some other remarks in this blog are hilarious too.
Stephen Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
@Antoine Vella

In fact, even he is about to surrender. Viva il poplu ! The media has failed its assigned mission. Bastille has fallen.
Stephen Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
Don't worry about it but your readers have understood that you cannot answer, when faced with the bare truth.

Very basic- To reach higher moral standards, send a ship to Africa every week and pick up the immigrants from Libya, that would save them drowning. Was that simple enough?

Ship goes to another African state. I even spread the words out.

I know its hard when even Nationalists have a go at you-LOL

J Martinelli (on 17/9/08)
d attard, are you a recipient of Andrew's exhaustive supply of salt?

If ABC's comments do not apply to you, why do you think that my comments 'are in bad taste... etc?'

Is it a case that truth hurts?
Fabrizio Ellul (on 17/9/08)
This blog is starting to look like a joad cressbeckler speech
martin Portelli (on 17/9/08)
"Happy Crassmas" to Europe's wit incarnate!
Joseph Grech-Attard (on 17/9/08)
"You must admit, I’m good. " Your'e not good. Your'e "Simply the Best!"........for non-ending repetitions and a fantastic hypnotic!!
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 17/9/08)
Stephen Farrugia - sorry, still pretty incomprehensible.
Victoria Grech (on 17/9/08)
@ Priscilla Grech

Yawn. Enough with the suit of armour already. You jump from ABC's to JB's blog asking the same question...Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawnnnnnnnnnn

Stephen Farrugia (on 17/9/08)
@ABC-To help you answer me better, what I am saying is that you are not part of the mainstream anymore. Isolated, alone in the hyper space cold. Your moral values are not high enough to even suggest that the EU should send a ship every week on the coast of Libya and pick up immigrants.(Save people drowning) Europe laughs at our burden sharing suggestion, which was a joke from day one. It is just another political ploy to play for time, until the Maltese are over run and it would be to late to react.
Yes holy monk, take the ship to a mission in Africa and this will safeguard a "michelin chef restaurant in heaven", because we all have the same destiny.
I can feel that you are about to cut and run, judging from your tone in your articles. I don't blame you, it must be hard living a ... whatever!

Now how about a lift to the Bahamas?
Antoine Vella (on 16/9/08)
Stephen Farrugia
..."the people under the stone are out numbering him 10,000 to 1."

Maggoranza gdida mela.
Chris Borg (on 16/9/08)
Good boy Andy :-)
d.attard (on 16/9/08)
When I read such graphic ‘sadistic’ metaphors on how our host can amaze a commentator on our host's ability to obtain an inexhaustible supply of salt which is applied to rub in so many wounds of so many people of such diverse backgrounds! People yearning for a dab of honey to help soothe their festering sores (no less), I wonder if this is just bad taste, gross, a glimpse of dodgy taste, a warped sense of humour, or what? I suppose it takes all sorts of tastes to amuse some gentle(lol)men
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 16/9/08)
J Martinelli - sorry, missed the Joe Muscat Love-in - I don't watch much television and the little I do watch certainly wouldn't include sycophantic self-gratification fests.

Stephen Farrugia - sorry, your comment makes so little sense, I can hardly see a way to answering it - except to say that many millions of Germans "voted" for Hitler, so your reference to numbers, whatever it is supposed to mean, impresses me not one jot.
Priscilla Grech (on 16/9/08)
Mr Borg Cardona,
What are you going to do now that the people are saying you make them yawn, ask for a suit of armour like your friend Fr Borg?
J Martinelli (on 16/9/08)
Andrew, it amazes me how you manage to obtain an inexhaustible supply of salt which you methodically rub in so many wounds of so many people having such diverse backgrounds!

Lil'elves are yearning for a dab of honey which will help soothe their festering sores.

How about concentrating on one subject at a time? Have you missed watching Joseph on One TV lately? Seems to me Daph has soaked it all up.
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 16/9/08)
Sorry, Chris Borg, I'll try to do better next time. :-(
Stephen Farrugia (on 16/9/08)
ABC has understood that the people under the stone are out numbering him 10,000 to 1. His moral last stand is so weak that he risks becoming a monk-lol.
Chris Borg (on 16/9/08)
yawn....bocc, make an effort...this is not as funny as it used to be :S
Ivan Grech Mintoff (on 16/9/08)
BIG YAWN!!!!!!!!

TICK! TICK! TICK!.... (as predicted by the Lil'elves who, as you were told and as you have shown, are way ahead of you...)

- No real subtance (none expected!)

- cover well blown by now (hope you get paid well in kind or otherwise for your 'Blog' (sic!))

- Zoom..

...nuff said.
Kenneth Cassar (on 16/9/08)
The problem with modern "environmentalism" (both in the public and political sphere) is that it is less about the quality of air, biodiversity, efficient energy use, etc (which is unquestionably good), and more about aesthetics (which is subjective). For instance, if a wind-energy farm in the centre of a village square would reduce fossil-fuel consumption (for the village homes' electricity needs) by half (to give an example, and assuming it would be cost-effective), I would probably go for it. Most people, I suspect, wouldn't.
Muscat Peter (on 16/9/08)
Lol …. What a surprise! Now he is not just asking us to judge him but to declare he is GOOD! I call this “The joke of the week”.

ABC tried to give us a self portrait but failed miserably to impress. As a poor artist he has no idea of shades, light and mixing of hues. The self portrait is even poorer with such a dull background though he purposely tried to add patches of blue to help his ego.

I refrained from calling ABC personally to ask him if all his mirrors at home and in office are so fake and shattered. But I will call him some day and give him some good hints how to make an interesting self portrait.

I have a feeling that ABC is trying to find a way to tell us that he has no more ‘fables’ to entertain us with. Today’s article is a very poor excuse. Certainly not GOOD!

Wooooooooopy indeed!
Michael Attard (on 16/9/08)
I wonder... do you actually stand for something?

All posts

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku