Blogs » Students' View

  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Molto Sapiente! (Very Wise!)

Sua Sapienza, the Pope has done it again. His philosophy has managed to hit the headlines after taking a very wise decision indeed. Following last Tuesday’s decision by the Vatican to cancel the planned visit to Rome’s La Sapienza, the text which was prepared to be read at the inauguration of the University’s academic year hit headlines around the world. The text which was ‘silenced’ by the few was listened to by the masses.

One cannot discount the implications of realpolitik on the Vatican. This certainly isn’t a phenomenon which should stop in front of the holy doors of St. Peter’s. No one can dismiss the philosophical capabilities of this Pope but by now few doubt that this Pope is turning out to be a worthy tactician indeed!

The Vatican was faced on Monday with a very difficult decision. It was the first time in years that a direct protest against the Pope was gaining ground on His Holiness’ home turf – Rome. The Pope, faced with a mini revolution of 67 members of staff out of a staff complement of 10,144, chose not to transmit his message to the few hundreds gathered in a hall but chose the many thousands whose attention was drawn to the event following the hullabaloo that was generated. The protest has now died down – the protesters achieved their aim – however, the Pope achieved his aim too: he was listened to, by an even greater audience. A very good result indeed - for the Pope most of all.

Rather than jumping the gun and calling last Monday’s events in Rome a sign of intolerance, why don’t we refer to them as a new reality? A part of La Sapienza today subscribes to the paradigm of science and this very same part is now vying to occupy the same moral position as the Church. As religion used to decide who the heretics were, science,now decides who its ‘heretics’ are.

Certainly, the Pope was declared a ‘heretic’ by this small group of scientists in a way which I disassociate myself from but, two wrongs don’t make a right. The censorship these scientists imposed deserves the same degree of condemnation. A boycott, although drastic, is in itself a sign, and since dialogue basically implies the transmission, reception and understanding of signs, then a boycott falls in the spectrum of dialogue, no matter how extreme it may be.

Dialogue, in any of its forms, can never be neither shameful nor bizarre. It is always human and, thus, always in an infinite need to be refined. La Sapienza presents a challenge, will we take it? Will the Church, Science and us be wise interlocutors in this debate?

Matthew Mizzi is a third year student of Law and Philosophy and the Development Officer of InSite, the student media organisation. www.insite.org.mt

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Sandro Bonanno (on 22/1/08)
I think it was a wise decision to cancel the appointment at the University. Rather than creating possible violence and unnecessary reactions, the Pope had no other alternative. We must remember that the students had already took over the Rector's offices illegal. Only the Supreme Being knew what other actions were envisaged in case the Pope visited the University. This could have led to possible violent reactions from a minority group. It was thus a good decision. Apart from this aspect, I wonder how the professor's students who signed the letter against the Pope must have felt if they did not agreed with their Professors.... maybe a retribution in the exam's marks!?? If these Professors were so 'intollerant' against a prominent figure like the Pope, I wonder what other 'intollerant' manners could have adopted against students who do not agree with them..... Meditate gente meditate!!!!
Francesco Troia (on 20/1/08)
You should read the article on the Corriere della Sera front page written by Claudio Magris (a famous Italian writer) today. He marks in a very simple way the difference between tolerance and intolerance. Unicuique suum.

All posts

Poll

Was the budget good for Malta?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku