The marks on the holy shroud of Turin need to be correlated with face marks on the linen cloth of Oviedo, Spain, for a full result of the evidence we have at hand to solve the puzzle of the nature of Jesus Christ’s marks and wounds: whether they tally, or are complementary, or not. Otherwise, a full discussion of the evidence of the holy shroud in Turin is probably incomplete.

Then, we can probably establish the circumstances and characteristics of the passion and death of Christ in around 33AD and the holy shroud’s survival until today.

Such studies can be followed via recent scientific experts’ results and those of the Salesian Centre for Sindonology, in Turin.

The ‘scientists’ of Oxford, Zurich and Tucson examined in detail a contaminated piece of the linen cloth of the shroud of Turin in 1978 and 1986 and came up with invalid results in their much-vaunted research.

The full truth about the shroud of Turin is coming out in dribbles through the years.

And the quoted evidence is erroneous: 1260-1390 are invalid dates when it comes to this holy shroud. The correct date appears to be centuries earlier.

We may not know at heart what the shroud is. But good experts know what it is not.

By elimination, the evidence appears to point to Jerusalem in Roman times.