Updated 5.25pm - Added PN comments 

The Opposition should not jeopardise Malta’s gaming industry, Competitiveness Minister Manuel Mallia said today.

Addressing a press conference, Dr Mallia, who is responsible for the gaming industry, urged the Nationalist Party to lobby for the definition of illegal gambling in a new EU convention to be amended, as eventual changes could have a negative impact on local industry.

The issue centres on a new definition of ‘illegal sports betting’ which the Council of Europe would like to adopt in its Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions.

The definition in question reads: “‘Illegal sports betting’ means any sports betting activity whose type or operator is not allowed under the applicable law of the jurisdiction where the consumer is located.”

Dr Mallia said the definition could mean Malta’s industry would have to change significantly.

“Will Dr Busuttil instruct his MEPs to lobby for this definition to be changed?” he asked, adding that the government was in favour of the convention in principle as it tackled many illegalities.

“We simply want to protect an industry that has been so beneficial for the island,” he added.

The gaming industry employs some 8,000 people and contributes more than €700million to the economy every year.

Dr Mallia and Dr Borg at today's press conference. Photo: Darrin Zammit LupiDr Mallia and Dr Borg at today's press conference. Photo: Darrin Zammit Lupi

 

'We built this industry' - PN

In a reaction, the Nationalist Party said that the government was playing a "high-risk game" in seeking to create a partisan issue out of gaming sector politics. 

Noting that the industry had been set up under successive PN administrations, the party insisted that "PN MEPs...will continue to defend the sector against the interests of other larger economies threatening it."

PN MEPs had no problem going against the majority when national interests were at stake, the party said. 

"What is certain is that PN MEPs will never hide behind a Group whip to defend an administration being brought to its knees by institutionalised corruption and a minister exposed in the Panama Papers scandal," they added, in an allusion to Leo Brincat's claim that he "had no choice" but to vote against a no confidence motion in minister Konrad Mizzi. 

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.