I am impressed with the efforts of some Labour supporters in their attempt to defend the indefensible in relation to Minister Konrad Mizzi’s involvement in the Panamagate scandal. Their efforts include trying to shift the issue into the realm of the irrelevant. The old-school Labour diehards are trying to focus on the question of whether Mizzi has lied or not. Whether he lied or not is totally irrelevant.

What is relevant, significant and totally unacceptable is the simple fact that a government minister (and a ‘socialist’ minister at that), entrusted with key portfolios such as health and energy that are particularly exposed to the risk of corruption, should set himself and his family up with a means to amass wealth away from his home country, and away from the scrutiny of his country’s tax authorities.

The key words here are “a means to amass”. He may or may not have hidden away any wealth, that fact has not been established yet, but even if he did not, it is certainly not because he did not have the means to do so, which then beckons the question: why did he set up this financial labyrinth in the first place? Apart from the question of whether the minister has lied or not, or whether he has broken the law or not, the fundamental question is whether Mizzi is guilty or not of betraying the trust of his electorate and that of the people by revealing himself to be dangerously embroiled in such an embarrassing mess.

One does not have to be particularly clever and objective notwithstanding being staunchly “either side of” partisan to reach the conclusion that Mizzi is guilty of such betrayal. Apart from the defence of Mizzi, what I find particularly worrying is the fact that under the circumstances, this saga does not seem to be going in one of only two possible directions for such scandals in truly democratic societies.

The alternatives are: the minister resigns from all political appointments, including his seat in Parliament, and disappears from the political scene; or the minister is invited to resign, or forced to resign. Such course of action is owed to the people of Malta who certainly deserve better.

It is owed to those genuine socialists who will undoubtedly be scandalised by the anti-socialist behaviour of a minister who is supposed to represent them. And finally it is owed to the Labour diehards who must be going through a process akin to inflicting self-harm in their Herculean task of defending an unworthy exponent of the party they support, who really should have known better.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.