Donor nations, rainforest-rich countries and multilateral institutions will have to spend tens of billions of dollars in the next few years to ensure that nations undergoing deforestation will have incentives to halt the practice, a report said.

Without the money to buy forest-based emissions reductions, the mechanism known as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) will be largely undermined, restricting incentives to keep trees standing, it said.

Deforestation is a major producer of heat-trapping gases in the world, accounting for around 15 per cent of global emissions.

Brazil, Indonesia and Nigeria are among the largest emitters of carbon dioxide from deforestation.

REDD is the main programme to combat forest destruction. It is being evaluated at the UN convention on climate change and will be part of the next global deal on climate due to be signed next year.

But since that agreement takes effect only in 2020, demand for forest-based emissions reductions would for a while be limited to companies looking to neutralise their emissions and a few carbon funds.

Compliance markets, such as the EU’s Emissions Trading System, do not accept forest-based offsets.

“There is currently no source of demand that will pay for medium to long-term emission reductions from REDD+ in the period between 2015 and 2020,” says the report produced by the Global Canopy Programme, the Amazon Environmental Research Institute, auna & Flora International, and the United Nations Environment Programme.

“This problem seriously threatens the successful implementation of REDD+, because without interim demand there will be little or no incentive for forest countries to participate and redirect resources towards REDD+, or for the private sector to invest,” it said.

Deforestation is a major producer of heat-trapping gases

The authors of the study ran some calculations using an EUproposal for a 50 per cent cut in global deforestation by 2020.

Hypothetically, if that target were to be achieved, the market for emissions reductions from avoided deforestation would become heavily oversupplied. The report estimates, assuming acceptance of the 50 per cent target, that supply of forest-based emissions reductions could be up to 39 times greater than demand in the 2015-2020 period.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.