Advert

Two demand compensation for extra time spent in jail

Two migrants who were held on remand for almost six years because they could not afford bail and who were subsequently sentenced to a four-year jail term have filed a court application demanding compensation for the extra months they spent in prison.

Omar Osman Omar and Anwar Otman Hasan had been found not guilty of rape but guilty of violent indecent assault and holding a woman against her will.

In their proceedings against the Attorney General today, they said they were held in remand throughout the six years of the court proceedings except for a period of just over a month during with Mr Osman was allowed bail.

When they were eventually convicted they had already served out the term plus an extra two-and-a-half years in prison because of undue delays in the proceedings.

They said that the actual trial only lasted four days and the six year period was therefore unreasonable and violated their human rights to a fair hearing within a reasonable time.

The application was filed by lawyers Roberto Montalto and Kris Scicluna.

 

Advert

54 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Mar 21st, 11:40

These people are humans and, no matter what they did, should be treated such. If our system is not capable of processing accused within a reasonable time, compensation is due to them. I find your comment digusting and degrading of respect towards fellow humans. I hope that you never end up in jail in a foreign country and get forgotten there. Hope you don't start squealing 'human rights'.

Ms Maria Vella

Mar 21st, 07:27

What bigger picture? Would you still Comment this way if your daughter had been indecently assaulted?

Perhaps you should look at your attitude and consider revising it

Benson Williams

Mar 20th, 19:35

I can't understand why, the Maltese originated from the south of Malta in the first place according to the history books back home in the UK, so really these people have just as much right to be treated fairly as anyone else in Malta, which lies only just< in Europe.

Liz WallikerG

Mar 20th, 20:45

Hear hear

Alex Ellul

Mar 20th, 22:49

Why do you have to raise the 'anti-Catholic' card? What the heck does being Catholic has to do with two foreigners trying to rape a woman, found guilty by our courts and (under)condemned for a 4 year term. From the criminals' names I take it that they are Muslim, but that has got nothing to do with the criminal act either. What's really of importance is the victim. Who will compensate her?

Alex Ellul

Mar 20th, 22:54

The reason why we take care, feed, medicate and feed the poor illegal immigrants is because of our Christian upbringing. We have been thought to love our neighbour, our enemies too. But Christ also told us to give Caesar what belongs to Caesar and that means that law breakers, especially women rapists or sexual molesters need to spend some time in jail, such as 20 years not a pittance of 4 yrs

Darren Portelli

Mar 21st, 18:05

Alex you're changing the topic. I did not play the catholic card or any other religion card about the perps. I made reference to us being a supposed catholic country but we are full of bigots.

Patricia Graham

Mar 20th, 18:05

Innocent until proven guilty.

It took 6 years for this case to come to Court, that is the crux of the matter.

THEN it was held behind closed doors and I for one am amazed that the compensation claim came first and not the appeal by at least one of them, who until the case was heard behind closed doors, had always been claimed by the victim as NOT one of the perpetrators.

Is that Justice?

James Dewar

Mar 21st, 00:20

Louis, the article reads they were found NOT GUILTY of rape. Their time in custody was spent AWAITING TRIAL and before they were convicted of any offence. The unjust part is that as untried and unconvicted persons a 6 year custodial period whilst awaiting trial is totally unjustified. Even in Malta where the wheels of justice move slowly and sentences frequently fail to reflect the crime.

Patricia Graham

Mar 20th, 19:03

Especially when so many cases are heard and found within a week.

T Pace

Mar 21st, 12:09

You must be out of touch with reality.

The duration of a trial has no bearing on the sentence that is given.

Had they admitted their crime, they might have spent less time in prison.

Patricia Graham

Mar 21st, 16:21

@ T Pace

Why would they admit to something they still profess they didn't do? In fact if I am not wrong one of the accused was actually told to plead guilty for the same reasons you gave and refused.

There was no reason for this trial to have taken as long as it did to come to Court and now someone has to pay.

Robert Callus

Mar 20th, 17:39

That might happen in some military regimes but I don't know of any democratic country that expects people to pay for the expenses they created while being illegally detained.

James Dewar

Mar 20th, 17:43

It wasn't their fault that they had to languish at Maltese taxpayers expense for 6 years awaiting trial. Their basic human right to a fair trial within a reasonable time was massively violated and as such they are well entitled to compensation.The incompetence of the Maltese justice system is fairly and squarely to blame for the shamables.

Franco Attard Trevisan

Mar 20th, 17:37

spot on!

Matthias Farrugia

Mar 20th, 21:23

best comment so far...... may i add...and first class too..

William Spencer

Mar 20th, 17:12

Yes compensate them for the time they claim to have been held over their sentence.

Then the compensation they receive must be awarded to the victim of their crime !!

Richard Ellul

Mar 20th, 17:33

Totally agree with William Spencer

T Pace

Mar 21st, 12:04

Could you identify what you called a 'mess'

You seem to have overlooked the fact that they were guilty not to mention the fact that under the laws of their own country the punishment would have been much harsher.

Advert
Advert