Advert

Osborne readies BoE remit change

Chancellor George Osborne might seek – possibly after a review – to drop words in the bank’s remit that prioritise price stability over growth and employment, which is a secondary goal. Photo: Reuters

Chancellor George Osborne might seek – possibly after a review – to drop words in the bank’s remit that prioritise price stability over growth and employment, which is a secondary goal. Photo: Reuters

When George Osborne stands up in Parliament to deliver his annual Budget this week, a usually routine passage will grab most of the attention: his marching orders for the Bank of England.

New instructions to the Central Bank for the first time in nearly a decade – if they give room to loosen monetary policy further – may be the best response the British finance minister has to a crescendo of calls to do more for an economy that could already be in recession again.

On spending and taxes, his hands are largely tied by a determination to lower the Budget deficit and public debt.

Though some economists argue debt would be easier to cut if more was done to boost growth, the Government is sticking to its guns, not least because otherwise would require a dramatic policy U-turn.

Former Bank of England policymakers and economists say a fresh remit is overdue after huge changes were forced on the bank by the deepest financial crisis in generations.

But barring a surprise, Wednesday’s announcement is unlikely to pave the way for a big shift in policy, they say.

The BoE has already taken a flexible approach to its remit to target inflation of two per cent. Price growth has run above target for most of the last five years as the bank sought instead to prop up the economy.

To reflect that, Osborne might seek – possibly after a review – to drop words in the bank’s remit that prioritise price stability over growth and employment, which is a secondary goal.

“It’s not a minor change because it really does materially raise the risk of higher inflation,” said Willem Buiter, a former BoE policymaker and now chief economist at Citi.

He favours keeping the remit unchanged to avoid any risk of stoking prices in a country where annual inflation hit 25 per cent in the mid-1970s.

“But if that’s what you’re doing in any case, clarity and honesty are always better than obfuscation and pretence,” Buiter said.

The Central Bank justifies its approach of aiming to get inflation back to target within two to three years with the fact that the remit also calls on it to avoid “undesirable volatility in output” when shocks hit the economy.

Osborne argues that to loosen up on austerity would risk a market backlash but the same could apply to a central bank remit which allows for significantly higher inflation.

If investors fear their returns will be eroded, they could rob Britain of one of its main advantages – ultra-low government borrowing costs – particularly when the bank eventually stops buying gilts with newly minted money.

The Government first instructed the BoE to target inflation in 1992. The bank was granted operational independence over monetary policy in 1997 and its mission has remained little changed since then, apart from a tweak to the targeted measure of inflation in 2003.

Calls for a rethink are growing as the UK economy struggles to show any growth more than five years after the start of the financial crisis while inflation has consistently exceeded the two per cent target.

Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney, who takes over the BoE in July, wants a debate on the BoE’s remit.

Investors have already responded to what they see as the prospect of a less inflation-focused Bank of England.

Prices of inflation-linked government bonds rallied sharply and real yields hit record lows last week. The prospect of the BoE, free to pump more money into the UK economy, has also weakened the pound to 30-month lows against the dollar.

“The market appears to have almost fully priced a change to the MPC’s remit,” Citi strategist Jamie Searle said.

But Buiter cautioned that a change to reflect what the bank is already doing did not, on its own, mean more stimulus was imminent although he expected the Central Bank to start buying bonds again soon.

Advert

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Comments not loading? We recommend using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox with javascript turned on.
Comments powered by Disqus
Advert
Advert