Advert

Don’t consult EU over hunting limit – FKNK

‘PN dealt blow to our hobby’

A future Labour government should increase the spring hunting bird limit without consulting Brussels, the hunters’ federation claimed yesterday.

The hunters’ agreement with PL is appalling
- Birdlife

The federation said it disagreed with the “servile” attitude of the Nationalist government of consulting the EU on the amount of hunted birds during spring.

The statement was made a day after the Labour Party unveiled an agreement with the hunters at the end of two-year discussions, which Birdlife yesterday slammed as “appalling”.

Among the conclusions, both parties agreed that a Labour government will “correctly implement a derogation” on spring hunting which respects the decision of the European Court of Justice on spring hunting.

Asked whether the hunters’ wish for a Labour government to keep the EU out of the loop on the national bag limit could be a recipe for further legal action, FKNK general secretary Lino Farrugia said if the EU issued any infringements “we will see how to tackle them later”.

In 2009, the court had found Malta in breach of the Birds Directive but allowed a small window of opportunity for a “limited” and “restricted” season due to the lack of birds available to be hunted in autumn, based on data given.

Mr Farrugia told The Times the agreement’s wording might look vague but Labour “is disposed to discuss increasing the bag limit”.

Asked how many birds the hunters were basing their numbers on, he said that, according to their calculations, the FKNK would be prepared to discuss in the parameters of 125,000 quails and 79,000 turtle doves, a tenfold increase on the current quotas allowed by the European Commission.

“We are not saying we will have these numbers but at least Labour is predisposed to consider this. We offered the same to the Government but the PN didn’t even want to meet us,” he said.

Mr Farrugia admitted Labour had not actually agreed on the new bag limit, and stressed nothing might actually change on the bird numbers.

But he added there were specific areas where the PL committed to deliver, including the removal of the €50 fee for a special licence to hunt in spring, the removal of time restrictions on when to hunt during the open season and the removal of an identification band to be worn by hunters during the practice of their pastime.

Requesting questions to be sent by e-mail, the PL said “the correct applicability of the derogation will be in accordance to the ECJ judgment. The application of the said derogation will be within the ambit of the existing framework.”

Mark Mifsud Bonnici from the Kaċċaturi San Ubertu said the agreement with Labour gives hope to hunters.

“We were not involved directly in this agreement but we endorse it completely. The PN has dealt a blow to our hobby – which means everything for us – and Labour will give it back to us,” he said.

Spring hunting is currently outlawed in the EU and through the ECJ decision only Malta was given the possibility of a limited and restricted season for hunting on turtle dove and quail.

A few other countries also apply limited derogations in spring but on different species and much fewer in numbers.

Last year, following consultations with Brussels, the season was opened between April 14 and 30 subject to strict rules, including a national bag of 11,000 turtle doves and 5,000 quails. Hunters were only allowed to catch two birds a day and not more than four birds during the whole season.

FKNK also disagrees with the daily and season limits and said that Labour will remove them.

During a visit to Malta in September, EU Environment Commissioner Janez Potocnik made it clear that hunters should not raise their hopes for better conditions on their spring hunting season as the quotas set by the Government had already reached their “upper limit”.

In a statement yesterday, Birdlife said that, while the PL/hunters’ agreement states that any changes will be made “in conformity” with the European framework, and commits to law enforcement, the six-point agreement contains commitments that appear to go against this.

“While committing to increasing enforcement is welcome, the detail of the agreement does not explicitly state how this will happen.

“We would at the very least have expected PL to force a commitment from FKNK to expel members who are convicted of illegal bird hunting and for their hunting licences to be revoked forever, but there is no such commitment.

“We will of course push for this if the PL is elected to government.”

Advert

89 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Daniela Spiteri

Mar 8th, 08:38

further to my comment regarding what you stated, maybe I was misunderstood, and regarding my comment below too. I never intended to say that YOU were in some way pushing for some illegality. So, I apologise. I stated that hunters are already getting what is LEGALLY and RIGHTFULLY theirs. So, if they are to get something more, this has to be done either illegally, or if they want, amend the EU law

Daniela Spiteri

Mar 7th, 16:29

and who said: "according to you what is right means "do whatever they like".? Why don't you read correctly what I wrote?
I never mentioned YOU....so please before trying to threaten me, please I expect YOU to apologize to me and ALL THOSE WHO LOVE THE ENVIRONMENT!

Mr Tony Gatt

Mar 7th, 17:55

@ Ms. Darmanin
Can I ask a simple question- what have birds done to you to upset you so much that you want them shot out of the sky? Even when they poop on my car I don't hate them that much.

Paul Camilleri

Mar 7th, 10:53

Fully agree with you.

John Portelli

Mar 7th, 11:28

Agreed

J Borg

Mar 7th, 12:42

Part 1

Dear Ms. Spiteri,

hunters are aware that the eu law applies...that is why we know that under Pl we will have much more. Hunting is allowed in all eu member states...& Malta will not be an exception.

re the consultation with the eu...well the commission wanted no spring hunting...& the federation claimed that spring hunting could be possible through derogations.

J Borg

Mar 7th, 12:44

Had Malta not gone to the ECJ and just took the commission's word we would not have had spring hunting.

same with the other issues. If malta had to ask the commission to increase its quotas, the commission would say no, not because it would be in violation of eu rules, but because in principle even if it has no legal justification, it does not want us to hunt.

J Borg

Mar 7th, 12:46

Thus Malta should not consult the commission, but simply engage technical experts (not BLM or FKNK) and set up a framework that gives the hunters their rights while not violating the Birds Directive.

FKNK did not just pop these figures, but engaged experts (paid from its own pockets) who came up with a bag limit that satisfies the hunters need & fully observes the eu directives.

J Borg

Mar 7th, 12:50

BLM want non of this...& PN r ready to please them instead of abiding by its referendum & electoral promises.

so who is arrogant & egoist....FKNK who want no more than what is allowed by d directive...or blm who want much more.

My vote has since my voting age gone to PN...but I posted back my tessera, flag & momorabilia....& will now be voting a party that seeks balance not vengance..PL bil qalb

kevin pace

Mar 7th, 13:55

To daniela
Jiddispjacini nghidlek li lino farrugia gie interpretat hazin, ghax lino qatt ma qal li mhux ha jimxi skond il-kummisjoni, imma ghax mhemx ghaliex titlob lil kummisjoni biex taplika deroga, deroga hija dritt bhala pajjiz biex jitloba, umbad sta ghall kummisjoni li wara it-tmiem ta l-istagun titlob rendikont u mhux qabel

C Mallia

Mar 7th, 15:08

Well said Daniela. Lets show everyone this and vote for the pary totally consistent against hunting - AD

Daniela Spiteri

Mar 7th, 10:56

ms Darmanin, when you read what Mr. Farrugia said, suggesting they should not consult the EU, shows only that they want to do WHATEVER they like! Do you know for example, that rules in Malta are as requested by the EU? Do you think that if Labour is elected this will change? No, because as Dr.Muscat said, they will not change any rules...according to you what is right means "do whatever they like"

Patrick Zammit

Mar 7th, 11:07

In the future, it will be FKNK that will be "pulling the government by the nose".

Mr Tony Gatt

Mar 7th, 11:07

Ms. Darmanin-

The EU is not just there to dish out money to Malta. It can also impose heavy fines- are you prepared to pay a few euro more in tax to cover these fines?

keith perry

Mar 7th, 11:14

The good thing is that if the wishes of the FKNK are imposed and the EU fines Malta YOU as a 'non hunter' will also pay !!!!!! Any second now... the exclamation marks will start appearing......

Willie Grech

Mar 7th, 11:34

@ Daniela Spiteri & Patrick Zammit.

No one can change rules but a government. Joseph Muscat has already declared that he is not prepared to change any EU directive, therefore laws. So what's the problem here? Unlike Dr. Gonzi, Joseph Muscat is a man of his word. Dr. Gonzi said yes to hunting/trapping before the election of 2008 but now it's a solid NO. Joseph Muscat will keep his word.

Emanuel Curmi

Mar 7th, 12:35

Dear Mr Caruana. Your words may turn out more prophetic than you dared hope. The hunting lobby may think that they have the PL in their pockets and the rest of the country at a stalemate but by giving them enough rope, they will end up hanging themselves. The idea of an abbrogative referendum may be a utopia at this point in time but every seed needs its time to grow.

C Mallia

Mar 7th, 15:15

May your prophesy come true. I am sure as well that by then most of the electorate will be completely fed up with the hunting community.

David Caruana

Mar 7th, 08:30

We should see this as a blessing Dott! If Malta is fined for the hunter's 'hobby', if each and every taxpayer will pay a price for their 'hobby', that would surely mobilise 10% of the electorate to sign for an abbrogative referendum.

That would be the end of spring hunting, once and for all.

James Wightman

Mar 7th, 07:32

Wood pigeon is considered vermin in the UK and a pest for farmers. its a bit different when bad hunters shoot protected species under the umberella of a 'season' (sometimes even out of it, on reserves etc..) they tarnish the image of legitimate hunters who follow the rules. Thats what hunters are paying for and why there is so much animosity to them. Clean up the act, you won't have a problem?

Pippo de Marco

Mar 7th, 08:16

@ James Wightman..

Quite right. And why would 'responsible' hunters not want to wear ID bands? Hmmm, I wonder ?

Typical FKNK, peeing into the wind, showering itself in glory and attracting ever more opponents.

keith perry

Mar 7th, 09:20

Borg, half truths again you know that turtle doves, songbirds, thrushes,skylarks and finches are protected in UK so tell us just what 'Rights of other EU hunters' your talking about? And as for wild bird trapping in UK ?.
James Whightman pointed out the truth on woodpigeon, clear up the other issue on 'species' then?
FKNK is the tail trying to wag the dog - PL on a lead! here boy!!

J Borg

Mar 7th, 12:55

Mr Perry,

it not half truths...the UK derogate because some birds are convenienty classified as pests...yet MAlta will derogate because there is no other alternative. The reason is different, b ut in both cases a derogation is possible, as confirmed by the ECJ.

moreover, other eu countries hunt, turtle doves, quail, thrushes etc...such as spain, italy, france, etc.

so what is your point?

keith perry

Mar 7th, 17:00

J Borg "Conviniently classed as pests"? Arrant rubbish ! woodpigeons are not classed as pests for the convenience of british shooters just to upset their 'poor' Maltese Hunters- they destroy crops! .
As you already kill the ones listed for your other southern pals just what is the SAME AS EU that you dont already have now?
Funny how you switch away from the UK parity you crave when it suits.

maria borg

Mar 7th, 11:56

well said

John Portelli

Mar 7th, 11:33

Sad indeed......a couple of dead birds are more important that one's future

keith perry

Mar 7th, 09:28

Herbert Falzon We will also see the popultation of Malta contributing to the fine if these people break the rules. Derogation - someone partisan decides how many birds fly through Malta migrating, hunters shoot birds on that supposed figure, texting when theyve shot one and only allowed two a day,four all told -then they pack up.! How many poachers did FKNK catch last season? Second word is OFF!

Advert
Advert