History is alive and kicking at this year’s Oscars in an unusually rich year for movies that plumb the distant and recent American past and have resonated with both audiences and voters.

Terrorism, slavery, war, politics and the CIA take centre stage in films that try to make sense of calamitous timesfor the US

Four of the nine nominees for best picture at Sunday’s Academy Awards ceremony – Iran hostage drama Argo, Osama bin Laden thriller Zero Dark Thirty, slavery revenge fantasy Django Unchained and US presidential drama Lincoln – are the most discussed films of the awards season, with their very different takes on historical events.

“It’s an interesting year for thought-provoking movies that have a semblance of reality. Some look to where we come from and where we are going, and they get people thinking,” said Pete Hammond, awards columnist for entertainment industry website Deadline.com.

It is a sharp contrast with 2012 when the silent film comedy The Artist was embraced by the 6,000 members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences as a love letter to old Hollywood. This time, terrorism, slavery, war, politics and the CIA take centre stage in films that try to make sense of calamitous times for the US and draw lessons for the future.

Lincoln, Steven Spielberg’s account of President Abraham Lincoln’s drive to persuade a divided Congress to abolish slavery in 1865, has spoken loudly to present-day Americans faced with daily evidence of political deadlock in Washington.

“The movie emphasises the theme of how difficult it is to get anything done in a democratic republic like ours, and how it requires wheeling and dealing and negotiating,” said Robert Thompson, professor of popular culture at Syracuse University.

“The idea of taking these very modern problems and seeing them positioned in this noble historical past has been one that, in an odd way, is very comforting,” Thompson added.

Not so comforting is Django Unchained, director Quentin Tarantino’s blood-soaked but audacious take on 19th-century slavery, filmed in darkly humorous Spaghetti Western style.

Spike Lee, one of the nation’s most respected black film-makers, called Django disrespectful to his ancestors and vowed not to see it.

“American slavery was not a Sergio Leone Spaghetti Western. It was a holocaust,” Lee said in a Twitter message in December.

Although the film has divided the African-American community, it has taken an impressive $154 million (€115 million) at the North American box office alone, received five Oscar nods, and sparked new debates about the brutal era of slavery.

No movie has split Americans more this season than Zero Dark Thirty, which was released less than two years after the killing of al-Qaeda leader bin Laden by US Navy Seals.

Attacked by politicians and some activist groups for its portrayal of torture in the decade-long hunt for Bin Laden, the film is being promoted in Oscar campaigns as “the most talked-about movie of the year”.

Zero Dark Thirty screenwriter Mark Boal said the film is intended to challenge Americans to ask questions. “It’s a story about our time, and our nation, and our role in the world,” Boal said in a speech at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles this month. “It contributes to public dialogue about our Government and its actions.”

It’s also a film that, for better or worse, may stand for years as the definitive version of the Bin Laden mission.

“We watched all the news coverage of the killing of Osama bin Laden. But we did not have those front-row seats and a movie is much more memorable than the President of the US standing by the podium and describing it,” said Thompson.

“Until another Osama bin Laden movie is made, Zero Dark Thirty is probably going to be one of the dominant ways in which that event is remembered.”

Argo director Ben Affleck sees his movie as “eerily current”, despite being set more than 30 years ago. Based on a real CIA mission soon after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, it recounts the rescue of six US diplomats from the Canadian Embassy in Tehran using an unlikely Hollywood movie cover story.

Noting the unrelenting political tensions between the US and Iran, Affleck told reporters in January: “I think we are feeling a bit frustrated as a country, and this was a time when the CIA and the Canadians went out and got something right.”

All four films have been accused of taking liberties with historical accuracy. But pop culture expert Thompson said movies should not be judged like journalism or history books.

“The great thing about art is that it turns data into a valuable experience. We want art to be working on this material,” he said. Dave Karger, chief correspondent for Fandango.com, said the Academy has always gravitated towards stories drawn from real life.

“I don’t think it’s a conscious choice, but I do think there is something appealing to most Academy voters in these quintessential American stories,” Karger said.

The Oscar best picture nominees are rounded out by musical Les Misérables, shipwreck tale Life of Pi, French-language drama Amour, mythological indie film Beasts of the Southern Wild and quirky comedy Silver Linings Playbook.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.