Advert

BirdLife call for hunting ban in nature protection areas 'pure nonesense' - FKNK

The Hunters' Federation (FKNK) said this evening that BirdLife Malta's BLM’s demand that Malta’s designated NATURA 2000 sites be declared no-hunting zones 'is pure nonsense'.

Reacting to a statement yesterday by BirdLife, (http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20130126/local/birdlife-seeks-hunting-ban-in-nature-protection-area.454883) the FKNK noted that BLM’s Executive Director, Steve Micklewright, admitted that “almost all of these protected nature areas are (or should be) accessible to the public, either by public roads and footpaths, or as nature parks and reserves.”

Therefore, FKNK said, it was completely incorrect for him to assert at the same time that “hunters and trappers have been allowed to rule the roost in the Maltese countryside”.

"In case Mr. Micklewright, a UK national, is ignorant of the fact, BLM’s UK partners, the RSPB, even permit hunting in some of their bird reserves or sanctuaries, also NATURA 2000 designated sites," the hunters said.

"Furthermore, Mr. Micklewright should be aware that in the UK various forms of hunting may be legally practised 24/7 throughout the whole year, so why should he come to Malta and militantly try to abolish our recreational socio-cultural hunting and trapping passions."

"BLM’s demand that Malta’s designated NATURA 2000 sites be declared no-hunting zones is pure nonsense.  Most of the land within NATURA 2000 is privately owned mostly by people whose way of life is hunting and trapping. In effect, this means they are also major stakeholders, and consequently their interests must be taken into consideration and respected. Whereas such zones are not totally protected, they are amenable to hunting and trapping since these activities are perfectly compatible in such zones, unlike what Mr. Micklewright would have the uninformed general public believe!," the FKNK added

It also referred BirdLife to tan EU FACE (Federation of Associations for Hunting and Conservation in the EU) project “NATURA 2000 and Sustainable Hunting in Europe” co-financed by the European Commission, in partnership (20%) with ELO, the European Landowners’ Organisation, and with the support of  BLM’s partners, BirdLife International.  The Federation for Hunting and Conservation – Malta (FKNK) was an active participant in said project:

http://www.huntinginmalta.org.mt/uploads/90/892/NATURA_2000_Write-up_in_English-October_2007.pdf

 

Advert

38 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

M. Cardona

Jan 27th, 20:51

Well done Pippo, your true colours are finally out. Extremism leads to extremist perspectives; denying hunters of their properties (compulsory) and having them segregated. Have you considered about the right to own property? Have you considered that "segregation" would be most appropriate for people of your ilk and to the benefit of all mankind? Want a referendum on that one?

Darren Caruana

Jan 27th, 22:04

The land does not need to be re surveyed. All records and site plans are at the lands dept and MEPA.
They can tell you that most land in Malta is privately owned wether BLM and you like it or not. Fact!

Maybe the authorities should issue a document depicting public land. So that everyone is informed. the rest is out of bounds I'm afraid

With regards to your referendum; Now THAT is pure nonsense!

Darren Caruana

Jan 27th, 22:06

Oh, and my land is already sign posted.
it says:

'Private No Entry'
Tresspassing is a CRIME

Darren Caruana

Jan 28th, 10:34

Re surveying the land is really not neccessary Pippo. All site plans are registered at the lands department and Mepa.
Maybe the authorities should issue a document depicting all public land for everyone to be well informed. The rest is out of bounds i'm afraid as it is private.

My land is signposted. It reads;
'Private, NO Entry' 'Tresspassing is a CRIME'

as for your referendum - Pure Nonsense!

D Borg

Jan 28th, 14:15

darren

are you trying to convinve yourself about your arguments by repeating them?

Pippo de Marco

Jan 28th, 16:36

Darren,

What are you scared of ? - If a referendum is 'nonsense' then why not get FKNK, KSU and anyone else you can muster to lobby the government to initiate a simple Yes or No to Hunting vote.

I would be happy to declare a victory for hunters if they achieved as little as a 30% 'Yes' vote. - Think you could manage that ? - if so, then put it to the test.

Pippo de Marco

Jan 28th, 17:16

@ M Cardona.

I never denied my opposition to hunting, or rather 'Bird Killing' as it is here. - What's more, we don't need a referendum on segregating 'People of my ilk' from hunters because we are more than happy to distance ourselves from people who kill Sparrows and Thrushes for fun.

And if you think I am in the minority, then why not press the next government to let the people decide?

Mr Anthony Formosa

Jan 28th, 19:22

Mr de Marco, if you voted YES in the 2003 referendum you've accepted hunting and trapping to continue, if you wish a re-referendum you're more than welcome.

Pippo de Marco

Jan 28th, 21:42

Mr Formosa,

I have a modicum of intelligence, so my decision to vote in favour of EU membership was made on the important issues. If shooters are aggrieved at how that was handled by our politicians, then why not lobby the next government for a referendum on the sole issue of hunting ?

I promise you, I would accept the decision of the majority, or even 30%. - But would you ?

Emanuel Curmi

Jan 28th, 14:22

Dear Mr Fenech. Sorry to wake you up from your slumber but our way of life has been constantly effected by foreign interference, be it thru tourism, commercially, politically, culturally or simply by widening our intellectual horizons. Accepting criticism instead of sulking will not only help us mature but go a long way to address our own shortcomings and improve our standard of living.

Pippo de Marco

Jan 29th, 11:43

Micklewrong and Parrot. - Yes, I can see what you did there, Joe.
Very clever. Very amusing. Very grown-up.

mario salnitro

Jan 27th, 20:04

If it is private property no one has the right to enter, be it hunting season or not .
That is why we have parks in Malta.

J. Vella

Jan 27th, 20:13

Still i dont expect that i own a private land, and someone decides to make a picnic in it or a bbq because its in natura 2000 site! Birdlife does not want to understand that they cannot go into private lands to make whatever they like to do!

Johnny Xerri

Jan 27th, 20:41

That is why there are over 30 bird sanctuaries, and many no hunting zones...like 50m from roads & many beaches, and other no hunting zones.

Is it possible that with large tracks of land such as buskett, simar, ghadira, Kennedy Grove, Chadwic lakes and many other areas...one cannot find a spot to enjoy some quality time in peace & observe nature and birds?

Maria Williams

Jan 27th, 22:18

Mr Salnitro & Vella, If the land is your honestly acquired property, of course you have a right to it.However you do NOT own the sky, if you shoot at a bird from your field, can you guarantee that the lead shot will not fall on a family picnicking on adjoining public land or using public roads nearby.This has happened to members of my family on the road to the Addolorata Cemetery back gate.

Lawrence Fenech

Jan 27th, 19:22

@John.

You must be jogging in a guva.

M. Cardona

Jan 27th, 19:27

You must be so much luckier than most if you have been seeing so many birds. If there's one thing hunters and birders concur on is that this year has been one of the poorest on record.

So much for "pure nonsense". Bye bye your time is up, wasted enough time.

Johnny Xerri

Jan 27th, 20:39

Hunting laws this year are same as those for the last couple of years...maybe your on a new set of contact lenses!!!

Hunting or not...the land accessible to you will be the same...public land...coz just because hunting had to be banned...you would still not be allowed on the hunters private land...so dream on

J. Vella

Jan 27th, 20:16

We shall protect unborn children from abortion ! That's a good reason to protect them since they have no one to protect them since they have no voice yet! Many people want to protect a bird but than they are in favour of abortion! Hypocrites!

Johnny Xerri

Jan 27th, 20:37

do fish need your vote as well...coz from what I gather some animals are not as equal as others...

I am right mr. fishkillers?

Robert Agius

Jan 28th, 07:19

J Vella, Should cows, pigs and chickens get a vote too? some bird are in danger of extinction. Can't say the same for humans. The main problem is that of some who think that all the land belongs to them and that it's fine to shoot anything that flies. FKNK never seriously dealt about this. They have only themselves to blame if hunting gets banned I'm afraid

J. Vella

Jan 28th, 12:33

Mr Robert Agius you are pathetic! So you think because their is a lot of humans we really dont need to protect them we can kill them! Well, i want you to imagine this....if you have a child already , and you are going to have another one, kill the biggest child and keep the baby... since you are saying that it makes sense to kill humans. !! Pathetic!

J. Vella

Jan 28th, 12:35

Mr Agius besides that i never mentioned that birds should have their voice heard like you are trying to do, by addressing me that 'should cows, pigs etc get a vote too'? address that to Mr. Sultana. He mentioned it. Regarding lands, if i have my private land, i will not let anyone , (not even you ) trespassing! Buy your own land.

Robert Agius

Jan 29th, 10:24

Personally, despite knowing a few reasonable hunters, am against hunting. I don't, however, need to justify myself using flawed logic. Clearly, banter is not your forte. Pragmatism, especially the American kind, which is how most of the world is now governed if you like it or not is not my taste either. But who knows, at this rate the might kill the youngest child....or that of the weakest nations

Advert
Advert