Financial transactions tax: 11 EU states forge ahead, Malta stays out
Updated - Germany, France and nine other euro zone countries got a go-ahead today to implement a tax on trading, despite the reservations of financial centres such as London and Luxembourg (as well as Malta) that are worried it could drive business out of Europe.
EU finance ministers gave their approval at a meeting in Brussels, allowing 11 states to pursue a financial transactions tax. The 11 are: Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, Portugal, Belgium, Estonia, Greece, Slovakia and Slovenia.
The levy, based on an idea proposed by U.S. economist James Tobin more than 40 years ago, is symbolically important in showing that politicians, who have fumbled their way through five years of financial crisis, are getting to grips with the banks blamed for causing it.
The tax could be introduced within months.
Although critics say such a tax cannot work properly unless applied world-wide or at least Europe-wide, some countries are already banking on the extra income from next year, which one EU official said could be as much as 35 billion euros annually.
Under EU rules, a minimum of nine countries can cooperate on legislation using a process called enhanced cooperation as long as a majority of the EU's 27 countries give their permission.
Malta is staying out because it fears the tax will harm the competitiveness of its financial services centre.
Germany and France decided to push ahead with a smaller group after efforts to impose a tax across the whole EU and later among just the 17 euro zone states foundered.
Sweden, which tried and abandoned its own such tax, has repeatedly cautioned that the levy would push trading elsewhere.
"COURSE OF LEECHES"
Critics say the levy could open another rift in Europe, where the 17 states using the euro are deepening ties in order to underpin the currency, and there is the growing risk that Britain could even leave the European Union.
Britain, which has its own duty on the trading of shares, has criticised the tax, and will not adopt it.
In today's vote, Britain, Malta and the other countries which have expressed concern about the impact on states that do not join the scheme abstained.
While the levy will hit banks and trading firms, the likelihood is that the cost will be passed on to clients and consumers.
But proponents of the scheme, including German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, believe it can tackle activity some deem speculative, such as high-frequency trading, by imposing a charge on every split-second, computer-driven deal.
But Nicolas Veron, a financial market expert at Brussels think-tank Bruegel, said the tax is misguided.
"There are so many things that we don't understand about the financial system, in much the same way that 17th-century doctors could understand a couple of things about the human body but not the whole picture," he said.
"Using a tax on financial transactions to tackle the ills of finance such as high-frequency trading could turn out to the equivalent to a 17th-century course of leeches."
Some countries are already counting on the new income, a welcome windfall for countries where shrinking economies and rising unemployment are sapping other tax income.
As soon as ministers give the 11-nation plan the go-ahead, the next step is for the European Commission to draft its plans for the tax.
It is likely to suggest taxing stock and bond trades at the rate of 0.1 percent and derivatives trades at 0.01 percent.
7 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr Lawrence Mifsud
Jan 22nd, 14:26
A search for HFT on Wikipedia makes interesting reading for those, like me, who thought of the new tax as out-of-this-world.
Peter Murray
Jan 22nd, 13:09
This show of brinkmanship by tiny Malta will be treated as merely a show of petulant resistance by the Barroso Bully-Boys who will now turn up the pressure to get their wicked way and the necesseary majority for this tax to be approved and Malta will sign up in the end.Ultimately a futile gesture as since when has the EU been a democratic union who takes into account individual member states
Mr ALBERT LEONE GANADO
Jan 22nd, 12:52
We will have to see how this new Tobin tax will affect our financial services. One hopes we have a high powered unit to monitor developments and act accordingly. It might be an incentive for financial companies to transfer services to Britain or Malta. However these signatories are sure to exert their financial and political clout to deter any institution operating withiin from evading this tax.
Dominic Chircop
Jan 22nd, 12:39
Even though both the PN and the PL have voiced their opposition to this financial transactions tax, one nevertheless can state that both parties are directly responsible for the coming into force of this tax.
When both parties voted in favour of the TFEU, what is termed as the Lisbon Treaty, they approved the introduction of the enhanced cooperation procedure. No plebescite !!
Mr Andrew Camilleri
Jan 22nd, 12:30
If Malta sticks to its declared position of not opting in, this could be good news for us, for lthough we will lose out on the income from the tax, it would provide more work in the financial services sector. Could we have a government statement about Malta's position? I hope that Malta does not give in at the last minute as opting in will spell a disaster for our economy and jobs.
Peter Murray
Jan 22nd, 13:51
Andrew -do you really consider we will not be "constrained" to be "invited" to join this Tobin Tax cabal.As what the EU want the EU get as the EU hierachy can never be accused of being democratic can they?
Josephine Tanti
Jan 22nd, 11:59
With a major part of volume emanating from HFT these projections might be misguided. To my knowledge Malta does not have any HFT firms; unlikely given the infrastructure proximity required to the major exchanges.
If they manage to reduce the onset of HFT without a return to on floor market makers it would be great. Maybe the parasites will stop feeding off the genuine buy & hold investors
Please choose the reason of your report below: