Rita Schembri defamation case: Arguments on freezing of assets

Rita Schembri

Rita Schembri

A magistrate said today that he would decide at a later stage whether to order the freezing of the assets of  Joe Borg , who is pleading not guilty to attempting to blackmail Rita Schembri, the head of the government’s internal audit bureau (IAID).

The request was made by the Attorney General.

Mr Borg is accused of having attempted to blackmail Ms Schembri, through an e-mail where he allegedly accused her of breaching a lease agreement.

Ms Schembri is at the centre of an investigation which she herself requested over allegations that she breached a code of ethics.

Magistrate Anthony Vella said he could not understand why the request for the freezing of assets was being made in a case over defamation.

Defence lawyer Daniel Buttigieg agreed that it was not right for his client to have his assets frozen over this case. He said his client was a businessman who always obeyed the law and this was not a case of money laundering.

Magistrate Anthony Vella deferred the case and said he would give a decision on whether or not the accused’s assets should be frozen at a later date.

Inspector Chris Pullicino told the court he had another witness to testify before he would be able to close his case.


Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Comments not loading? We recommend using Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox with javascript turned on.
Comments powered by Disqus