Advert

Mum fears for sons’ safety as burns probe takes time

A mother whose twin sons were burnt with cigarettes more than four months ago is still waiting for police to take action against the man who the boys claim was responsible for hurting them.

This was not just about mistakenly dropping ash. This was a burn, literally, a hole in the body

On August 25, Suzanne Formosa’s six-year-old boys returned home with cigarette burns on their fingers, back, legs and tummy. One of them had five burns and the other had three.

She filed a police report the day after and police took a statement by the boys, who told them what had happened when they were in their father’s custody and identified the man who caused their burns (not the father).

Ms Formosa complains that no action has yet been taken against the alleged perpetrator and she fears her sons are still in danger. As the police gather evidence, the children visit their father four times a week, which means the perpetrator knows where to find them.

“This was not just about mis­takenly dropping ash. This was a burn, literally, a hole in the body… Just having one is one thing but having all these – look how clear they are,” Ms Formosa said as she held up photographs of her sons’ blistered bodies.

She insisted she wanted to speak up because something had to be done about such delays.

“This is something people saw, the children spoke out, the burns were there, the police were informed, Appoġġ was informed, I’ve been all over the place… and nothing, for four whole months,” she said.

The police said they were investigating the case and that the lack of action so far was due to “certain inconsistencies” in the children’s version of events.

When Ms Formosa discovered the burns last August the boys told her they were mosquito bites. A child psychologist later told her it was normal for children to lie to protect people.

The following day she took them to the Gżira health centre. They told the doctor they had been burnt with cigarettes and mentioned the name of the man who did it.

The doctor drew up a report, seen by The Times, and Ms Formosa then went to the Sliema police station. Police there spoke to the boys and what they told them was included in their report, also seen by this paper.

When the police officer asked them where the incident happened they said it was “during the feast of St Julian’s where there were the stairs, the boats and the ducks” – referring to Spinola Bay.

The Sliema police then sent the case to the St Julian’s police station since the incident happened there.

Meanwhile, Ms Formosa filed an application in court to stop the boys from visiting their father, believing they were in danger. This was acceded to for three weeks but it was later overturned since the court had no evidence of where and by whom the boys were injured.

Ms Formosa then went to Appoġġ, the government support agency, and was initially told they had not received her file from the police. Once the file was open, however, the agency spoke to the children and carried out a surprise visit at their school.

The police said: “Appoġġ has been involved in this investigation as a normal practice since children are involved. Suspects are prosecuted only when the police have exhausted all the investigations and that there is prima facie evidence that the accused has a case to answer.”

When contacted, Appoġġ said it could not divulge information on specific cases due to confidentiality; however, all referrals of abuse or child maltreatment “with evident physical symptoms” were dealt with urgently.

“Investigations about child abuse cases are given priority… and the agency ensures the child’s safety is given utmost importance. Duration of investigations by Appoġġ and assessments depend on the case and the severity of abuse. Furthermore in situations where the police and/or courts are involved, the agency works hand in hand with these entities, and the course of action is determined in liaison with them.”

Advert

94 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

James Tyrrell

Jan 4th, 14:16

'The fact that the children were inconsistent with their versions is proof,' of absolutely nothing. What a silly statement. The children are 6 years old for God's sake. They are going to give a different version of events depending on which parent they are with at the time because they want to please both.

Anton Muscat Doublesin

Jan 8th, 16:22

When they saw in the media the authorities started doing something, ok.
YES, James that's what happened!

paul camilleri

Jan 3rd, 09:38

Mr Dewar while some of your comments are agreeable it is also stated by the police that the account given by the boys has “certain inconsistencies" which only makes it harder for the police to find the truth and the whole truth. this reminds me of that boy in school lying to his mother about actions taken by a teacher which were untrue and as a consequence the teacher got beaten up!!

James Dewar

Jan 3rd, 12:20

@ Paul Camilleri: Yes Paul I agree that inconsistencies must be checked and bottomed out but how long does it take? In addition we are dealing with very young children who are probably very confused and afraid and may well have been pressurised into covering up for the perpetrator.

paul camilleri

Jan 3rd, 13:37

if there are inonsistances then it takes as long as it takes to get to the truth and make a conviction stick. but it may also be that the boys are making it up to cover what they are actually doing themselves. i.e playing with fireworks or other flamable stuff.

James Dewar

Jan 3rd, 17:51

@ Paul Camilleri: Paul the "takes as long as it takes" maxim is not appropriate when child welfare issues are at stake and enquiries must be progressed urgently. In the interim if there are outstanding issues that can not be readily confirmed or resolved arrangements should be put in place to protect the children and they should not be left exposed to further abuse as reported in this case.

paul camilleri

Jan 4th, 08:08

Mr Dewar
If a person is really doing this to the children he should be locked away but would you like to have a person locked up without conclusive evidence?this is the whole point of the case if the police found inconsistency with what the boys are saying this means they are not sure that the boys are really being abused or causing self inflicted injuries.

Anton Muscat Doublesin

Jan 3rd, 09:25

Yes you are right!

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:13

according to the boys he was present and even lifted up one of the boys t-shirts the
boys stated this to the police not to me

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 3rd, 21:57

i asked for monitored access even that was denied what the judge gave was that the kids were to be taken to a clinic every time he collects them and before he gets them to make sure no more harm was done can you imagine that on the boys as well

Anton Muscat Doublesin

Jan 2nd, 20:27

Not the European Union but the local AUTHORITIES!!!!!!!

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:11

maltese courts are not supported by european union, even called them

Denis Pace

Jan 2nd, 23:22

X'ghandha x'taqsam!!!

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 3rd, 22:04

i cannot not send them because the judge ordered for my arrest if i dont so i had no choice

J. Camilleri

Jan 2nd, 15:22

....But they are not believing how the burns came or who made them....... we are believing these boys or not

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:07

he still sees my kids despite what he did to them his brother is always present with cigerates in front of them

James Dewar

Jan 3rd, 19:01

@ Suzanne: Maybe we should refrain from identifying possible / alleged suspects if we expect whoever is ultimately charged to receive a fair trial and not encourage vigilante type behaviour or allegations that his / her right to a fair trial was ruined by comments in the media.

Pauline Abela

Jan 4th, 05:01

Good comment, Mr Dewar. I note, however that Ms Formosa is not accusing anyone, she is merely stating that the brother is always present. Others may also be present.

Ms Formosa, well done for trying your hardest to make your voice heard and to protect your boys. Please be careful what you say as Mr Dewar is correct and what you say could backfire.

Can you stop the father from seeing kids?

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:05

the kids always said the same to the doctor to the inspecter and surgenta in sliema the same version of events even to appogg the boys dont lie they are only 6 and always consistent in their injuries

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:12

Yes, one wonders. I find it ridiculous that further delay and obstruction has been caused to what is an urgent enquiry as a result of the enquiry being passed from one Police station to another. Is there no centralised specialist Police child abuse unit in Malta to assume responsibility for such allegations and fast track enquiries to ensure the welfare of the victims?

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:03

how true my report was made in sliema but then discovered that the incident happened in st julians

P Bonnici

Jan 2nd, 13:36

Unfortunately that is not the mentality of most police officers in Malta, though there are a few good ones but these tend to submit to the unpleasant ones. The good ones are too scared of losing their jobs if they step out of line. Better shut up and keep head down - don't rock the boat. I worked in that environment before and I know what I am saying.

J Martinelli

Jan 2nd, 13:59

I don't think anyone has to tell the cops to do their job, how to do it, while reminding them that theirs is a 'vocation' & not a job leading to 'a pension after 25 years' (of service).
The police cannot proceed against anyone without obtaining sufficient evidence first. When a case involves young children there may be conflicting evidence which will cause the case to be thrown out of court.

P Bonnici

Jan 2nd, 15:09

J Martinelli

I agree with your second paragraph.

Richard Ellul

Jan 2nd, 15:25

@ J Martinelli
This seems more like procrastination to me. Arrests should have taken place at once to interrogate suspects. Was this done?

"A mother whose twin sons were burnt with cigarettes more than four months ago is still waiting for police to take action against the man who the boys claim was responsible for hurting them." The boys have identified who is responsible. I rest my case

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:15

@ J Martinelli: Yes evidence is required but the length of time being taken to gather and analyse the available evidence is unacceptable given the nature of the allegation and the age of the victims who according to this article, remain exposed to danger.

G Schembri

Jan 2nd, 19:38

J. Martinelli what evidence can they collect, the boys showed them the cigarette burns, and have named the man who did it to them. What other evidence do they need maybe a corps of one of the children. Had I been the boys' father I would have severed all communication with this man even if he'd been my father.

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 22:01

they even had the cheek to tell me it can take up to 2 years investigation

Richard Ellul

Jan 3rd, 19:12

@ Suzanne Formosa
I really sympathise with you. I know what your children are feeling.

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:19

If the enquiry had been progressed with the required degree of urgency and professionalism we wouldn't be in a position where the need was felt to question or doubt those involved.

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 21:58

i suggest you read the story well

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 21:57

exactly

Suzanne Formosa

Jan 2nd, 21:55

anke ittra lil president mort tajt u email ukoll u ir risposta kienet li ma jistax jindahal faffarijiet tal qorti

Joseph N. Attard

Jan 2nd, 10:28

That is the problem Mr. Bonnici. We express our thoughts on all sorts of subjects here, but it is very doubtful whether the officials or politicians concerned take much notice. The only reaction that may be remotely forthcoming is when elections are approaching.

Anton Muscat Doublesin

Jan 2nd, 10:38

Hear Hear!

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:24

@ Joseph N Attard: I have often thought that despite being provided with a first class medium by T.O.M to voice opinions no notice seems to be taken by those in the Government, Police or Judiciary. Whilst I acknowledge that some extreme opinions should be dismissed out of hand there are many concurring sensible postings that the authorities would do well to consider.

E. Vassallo

Jan 2nd, 10:31

Th Judiciary have nothing to do with it. It is the work of the police to prosecute. Check your facts before making such comments.

Norman George

Jan 2nd, 12:09

You are right Mr. Vassallo but now when the case goes to court, if there is no admission, we'll probably get a sentence in 20 years time - the whole system does not need an upheaval but an an earthquake!!

P. Ciantar

Jan 2nd, 10:56

then Anton the police are not doing their duty it seems !

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:48

Encouraging brief comment. All aspects? Have you provided a Police statement to that effect backed up by facts?

Anton Muscat Doublesin

Jan 2nd, 10:36

Veru you right!

Lisa Fenech

Jan 2nd, 10:58

I agree with you 100%

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:28

Yes, the all too familiar "we will learn the lessons from this case" (when it is far too late for the victims) would seem to be looming in the distance.

paul camilleri

Jan 2nd, 09:58

i have to comment to your ill understanding of police procedures. yes months have gone by without any signs of an arrest, but would you rather have the person/s responsible to get away scot free due to lack of evidence? let the police do what they do best and catch criminals and stop this empty talk of which i am sure is just to draw attention to you.

Richard Ellul

Jan 2nd, 13:21

@ Paul Camilleri

Are you joking??? Unsolved murders, how many???

James Dewar

Jan 2nd, 18:33

@ Paul Camilleri: Paul, I agree that Police must be allowed to carry out their enquirers to ensure a water tight case. There are however realistic timescales to be observed and procedures must be seen to be professional and efficient. This does not seem to be the case here where it would appear that the victims remain in danger and nothing has been done to eliminate or even reduce that risk.

godfrey caruana

Jan 2nd, 11:37

pail caruana x'ghandu x'jaqsam il-gvern u l-burokrazija,hija xi haga tal-pulizija u li jidher hawn hu li m'hemmx provi cari,min jaf kieku jarrestaw xi wiehed bi zball u ma jnumx hu xi nghidu wara

P Bonnici

Jan 2nd, 13:42

godfrey caruana

If the police want to find evidence they will. We are talking about a minor and not an adult and this is a very serious assault on a minor.

Martin Saliba

Jan 5th, 14:34

It is also a very serious acusaation . Women have cried rape and later admited to making up their story . Women have also mde their children to say that they have been sexually abused by their father . Im sure their are cases and examples of fathers doing the same thing but to convict a person , male or female , on the testimony or rather story of a 6 year old is a very dangerous thing .

Advert
Advert