Free energy – fact or fiction?
In a world where energy consumption is always rising, the cost of generating energy is becoming ever more expensive. So it is not surprising that in many countries, including Malta, this subject always features as an election issue.
This is because the cost of energy has a big impact on the cost of living. It also affects the country’s economy. Fortunately, many countries that rely on conventional methods of producing energy from fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and gas are seeking alternative ways of meeting their energy demand.
The main concerns regarding fossil fuels are their price fluctuations, environmental pollution, dependence on other countries’ extraction and transport logistics of these fossil fuels. In the past five years, the price of crude oil has almost doubled.
Since 1985 there have been 19 cases of environmental disasters caused by oil spills, the latest major one in the Gulf of Mexico.
Current methods of generating energy harm the environment due to air pollution. An international study shows that asthma is one possible symptom of such pollution.
In Malta in 2002, almost 15 per cent of children suffered from asthma, though it cannot be attributed completely to air pollution. This rate is double that of 1995. The higher incidence of this condition indicates that it is not mainly a natural condition, but is being aggravated by more air pollution.
To date, Malta has no fossil fuel energy resources so it is at the mercy of other countries’ fuel extraction and delivery policies. In situations of political turmoil, energy-producing countries are in a strong position to penalise a country by refusing to supply it with this source of energy.
This is why, in today’s world, the struggle for power is directly linked to the struggle for oil. These concerns are enough to put pressure on governments to start exploiting renewable energy sources.
Although this form of power generation has many advantages, investing in this technology is still very costly, which is why some governments are reluctant to follow this route exclusively. For example, energy generation using solar panels has been around for more than a decade. Since then, technology, especially in semiconductors, has grown exponentially. However, there was little technological advancement in the field of renewable energy generation.
Today, it takes from six to 10 years to recover one’s investment in the renewable energy technology currently available on the market. After this time, a reinvestment might be necessary to keep up with advances in technology. To reinvest in the newer technology one needs to fork out even more money.
Is it really in the interest of the big oil corporations to invest in this technology to make it more efficient? The stakes for these corporations are high considering they have made their money by using traditional methods of energy generation for so long.
Besides, keeping control over oil is synonymous with controlling the world’s political fate. So it is not surprising that the big oil firms will lobby with all their might to keep the status quo and brand fossil fuels as the main sources of energy.
Everyone is led to believe that free energy generation is not possible. This might not be completely true. The cosmos, even the empty regions of the universe, is said to be composed of anti-matter (or dark matter). Anti-matter is linked to the generation of gravity. If one can harness this element, doubts that free energy generation is not possible will cease to exist.
An independent, non-profit foundation, known as Keshe Foundation (www.keshefoundation.org/en), was set up to promote new technologies for space exploration. It claims to have achieved success in generating free energy by using the concept of matter versus anti-matter, which can create a gravitational effect. This artificial gravity can then be used to generate electricity.
If what the Keshe Foundation claims is true, the opportunity of free energy generation will also cause the big oil corporations to lose their control on the world’s economic and political climate
Such an innovation will not be easily allowed to become readily available, and immense pressure will surely be exercised not to allow such technology to go out in the public domain.
Having access to free energy is one of the key elements to improve the world’s economic situation. Whether fact or fiction, we surely know that the world’s current main sources of energy are not infinite. The present generation needs to be much more responsible to create a world that is energy self-sufficient, for us and for future generations.
Earth is home to all of us and as humans we cannot continue to abuse its natural resources in an uncontrolled manner. We should not rely on governments to take action. We should start being more aware of the way energy is produced and put pressure on governments to follow the right energy policy.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
B. Farrugia
Feb 12th, 13:49
May the Force be with you.
Geoffrey Demarco
Jan 3rd, 10:28
I find free-energy difficult to go easily to the public due to the fact that in order for governments to pay the huge amount of debt that is created, they need to get the tax from energy. They will never pay the debts if free energy is available to the public!
Alex Ellul
Jan 1st, 12:05
There are no free lunches and no free energy. Nothing comes free in life ebven if we can squeeze out energy from the ether, as this lady seems to suggest. The Keshe foundation is nothing but hog-wash. However, there's a new scienctific thing coming up. LENR, or Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.
Mario Desira
Dec 30th 2012, 22:18
No doubt some inventors have come pretty close to obtaining so-called free energy but have been hushed up, murdered or their copyrights bought and hidden. It suits some people in power/governments we continue to depend on oil. The biggest tragedy was that in the early 20th Century Serbian genius Nicholas Tesla, with his Wardenclyffe Tower experiment, showed we could obtain energy for free,
Geoffrey Demarco
Dec 30th 2012, 19:11
Free energy? Surely the world will be a better place! This will serve well for PL political agenda regarding the reduced Utility bills!
@Edward Mallia: your point is not clear! I checked the site mentioned in the article. It seems quite credible! The Keshe foundation do exist?
Edward Mallia
Dec 31st 2012, 08:52
I am quite sure the Keshe Foundation exists; so do the writings of Nostradamus, the calendar of the Maya and the Gospel of Nicodemus. But 'existence' by itself carries no automatic implications of reality or actuality. The writer, made up of good old "matter", got into a complete mix-up on "anti-matter" and "dark matter" and their respective "properties". Have you informed the PL about this?
Geoffrey Demarco
Dec 31st 2012, 10:30
I beleive Mrs Tabone is talking about the concept of free energy and her emphasis is not really how free energy is obtained. People are not interested to know the physics behind PV cells, but are interested in their use! This is an article and not a technical paper! Coming out with such a hot article is admirable! The author also left the benefit of the doubt as fact vs fiction!
Edward Mallia
Dec 30th 2012, 16:44
A marvellous juxtaposition of obvious fact and transparent fiction. The fiction is the the last 3 or 4 paragraphs, where the writer did not even manage to get names right, never mind explain this notion of "free energy".
To be fair, the claims made in the "advert" for what is called "Malta's National Energy Policy" are scarcely more credible. And those are made at public expense.
Please choose the reason of your report below: