Advert

Piecemeal scheduling undermining tourism policy - FAA

An aerial photograph showing piecemeal scheduling in the VIllino Chappelle area.

An aerial photograph showing piecemeal scheduling in the VIllino Chappelle area.

While the government was doing its best to recover parts of the fortifications that were in private hands, the planning authority’s practice of only scheduling parts of heritage gardens made the construction of flats in these gardens possible, Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar said.

It said in a statement that building more empty flats in heritage gardens, such as Villino Chappelle, Villa Bonici and Villa Mekrech, harmed residents’ health and undermined Malta’s tourism policy aimed at boosting tourism through the valorisation of heritage properties.

"It is just as unthinkable as building flats in Palazzo Parisio - a model of what can be achieved with such properties," it said.

It praised what it described as the recent move in favour of the preservation of heritage buildings but said that MEPA wasfailing in its responsibility to ensure that owners carried out at least basic maintenance of scheduled properties.

Old villas, it said, were being bought for the development potential of their large gardens, so their collapse through neglect would favour the owners.

 

Advert

5 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joe Grech

Dec 28th 2012, 21:15


And can you imagine building flats in what remains of Palazzo Parisio Gardens, Mr Mizzi? Or San Anton, or Villa Bologna if we come to that? If mistakes have been made, should we make them worse? Or are you one of the developers that has bought up one of these gardens, because that's what it sounds like.

Ray Pisani

Dec 29th 2012, 18:42

FAA are making a valid point and all you care about is the example they used.
I do imagine FAA were talking of Palazzo Parisio's formal garden which is the one everyone sees on emerging from the Villa at the rear.
The land used for the Trade fair was rented out not for development but to be used to encourage trade
in Malta. I doubt if any of the structures are permanant.

Josianne Carabott

Dec 30th 2012, 05:19

Thks to FAA we the public are having our rights, there are many places that can be built, so in these gardens you like to built flats, a place that is a 50yr old is a heritage and everyone needs to obey the law, and they have 200yrs so what they are called?FAA used a good eg so the other gardens are an icon in Malta and no one can destroy our heritage. FAA are a jewel in Malta and doing a good job

Advert
Advert