Advert

Olympics committee: take action on officials

Malta could be denied Olympic accreditation

A frame from the secretly filmed video by The Sunday Times of London featuring Malta Olympic Committee president Judge Lino Farrugia Sacco and general secretary Joe Cassar.

A frame from the secretly filmed video by The Sunday Times of London featuring Malta Olympic Committee president Judge Lino Farrugia Sacco and general secretary Joe Cassar.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has dismissed a show of support from its Maltese affiliate for the officials involved in the organisation’s ticketing scandal and insisted action must be taken.

The IOC was reacting to a vote of confidence by the General Council of the Maltese Olympic Committee in its president, Mr Justice Lino Farrugia Sacco, and its general secretary Joe Cassar.

They have both been named by the IOC’s ethics commission as having been involved in a discussion with undercover reporters from The Sunday Times of London, apparently trying to circumvent the official ticket reselling mechanism.

A spokesman for the international organisation said its decision still stood and the IOC’s executive board was expecting action to be taken against the MOC’s top officials.

Nothing had changed, he said, adding that if action was not taken the IOC would announce the next steps it may take against the MOC and its members.

“At this stage we will need to see what actions the national Olympic committees take before deciding on the next steps. As the process is ongoing, we will not be commenting further,” the spokesman said.

The statement comes amid a stalemate after both officials refused to step down.

Last week, Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco – who is also facing an impeachment motion in Parliament over his position as judge as a result of the public rebuke by the IOC – said he was “considering” resigning his MOC post.

However, when contacted he said there had been no change.

“Should there be any developments, I will let you know,” he said.

The IOC has no power to directly discipline individuals in national affiliates but its executive board had warned that if the officials concerned did not face consequences, it could deny the MOC accreditation to its events, including the Olympic Games and the Youth Olympic Games.

Elections for the new executive committee of the MOC are expected in March.

Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco had defied a directive from the Commission for the Administration of Justice in 2006 to step down from the MOC, since holding such a position was in breach of the judiciary’s code of ethics.

This led to an unprecedented public reprimand of the judge in 2007.

Departing from its usual discretion, the Commission published a letter it sent to the judge in which it noted that his behaviour was unacceptable and that he was breaching the code of ethics of the judiciary.

But Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco stuck to his guns and in 2008 again contested the post of MOC president and won a third term. Following the recent reprimand by the IOC, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi called on the judge to “do the honourable thing” and relinquish his judgeship.

He then filed an impeachment motion, in which the next step is for the Commission to make a recommendation to Parliament.

If, according to the Commission, there is prima facie evidence for impeachment, Parliament will need to muster a two-thirds majority to impeach the judge.

Labour leader Joseph Muscat said he would follow the recommendation of the Commission, which is expected to be published early next month.

Advert

62 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Alfred Falzon

Dec 23rd 2012, 10:48

@ Francis Saliba MD

Whenever such things happen, within his Party, in Local Councils led by Labour Mayors or beyond, Dr Joseph Muscat chickens out & passes d bucket on to somebody else!

Not so, regarding Dr Angelo Farrugia, who may have been a thorn in his side!

He was quick to act & mercilessly he did, ignoring even those who voted him in!!

Strongman tactics with d weak!

Alfred A Falzon

James Wightman

Dec 23rd 2012, 09:46

It there of course was a story in the first place? Isn't finding someone guilty without proof a Taliban trait?

James Wightman

Dec 23rd 2012, 10:09

Unlikely, no crime or offence was actually committed.

The punishment hardly fits the crime if no crime has been committed!

Mr J. Bonnici

Dec 22nd 2012, 18:36

As things stand I don't see any other solution. It was very immature of the General Council to take such a step when the parent body requested otherwise.

James Wightman

Dec 23rd 2012, 09:58

That won't work the MOC is an independent NGO, technically you'd have to be in the MOC and a federation delegate, which would mean several hard years of voluntary work to climb to that position in the 'olympic' sport of your choice. Oh and corruption and power, there isn't really any serious money to be made from it.

So who would take over? In most committees people are back pedalling away.

Joe Grech

Dec 22nd 2012, 17:07

@J Martinelli - You're being politically blinkered asking Dr. J. Muscat to LEAD. Muscat acted correctly saying that the PL will ''follow the recommendation of the Commission (for the Administration of Justice).
It was the present inefficient ''administration'' which failed to push for impeachment procedures against Farrugia Sacco two years ago prefering to put its political interests first.

m. borg (slm)

Dec 22nd 2012, 17:46

MrMartinelli when it comes to leadership Joseph has shown his qualities in The Anglu Farrugia case, which makes gonzi one with a lot to be desired considering the follies of Austin Gatt, Tonio Fenech, Dolores Cristina, George Pulicino ,and others.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 22nd 2012, 20:59

@joe Grech & m borg.

After the Depasquale case everyone knew that the MLP could not be relied upon to cooperate in the impeachment of defaulting judges regardless of the clear condemnation by the Commission for the Administration of Justice. Muscat's latter day respect by the MLP/LP for the recommendations of the CAJ is only a pretext delaying the impeachment process.

Joseph Grech Attard

Dec 22nd 2012, 23:12

So doesn't the usual 'innocent unless proved guilty' hold any more? That is very dangerous & holds only in totalitarian regimes, as those of Mussolini, Pinochet, etc. Why doesn't parliament wait for the result of the Commission? Is GonziPN going to take an amoral and unehical political advantage from all this if the opposition votes against or abstains? That is what seems to be theiir aim! Shame!

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 23rd 2012, 10:11

@JosephGrechAttard.
"Innocent untill proven guilty" holds good as long as the wheels of justice are allowed to run smoothly without interference from politicians suspending the law courts, ransacking them, intimidating the judiciary, shifting judges whilst adjudicating a case or stultifying the impeachment process.
I would add Mintoff to your list of those who showed no respect law for the law

Alfred Fenech

Dec 22nd 2012, 14:31


Changing of the guards would be the right thing to do.

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 20:33

Nothing ever stopped you volunteering... oh it is voluntary, did you get the memo...?

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 20:35

And you'd do better? For free, for long hours... ? have a little respect yourself for peoples time and effort.

Mr Tony Gatt

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:03

I don't think that people are that naive. They could always sue, of course.

Ray Buhagiar

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:40

No need for screen. All they had to say is that as MOC officials they do not deal with tickets and they will report to IOC. Was that so difficult to do?

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 20:31

If someone walk in and says I'm interested in becoming an authorised ticket seller, but fails to mention that they are a journalist? Not a case of being naive surely...

Ray Buhagiar

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:04

I totally agree. Some of these officials have been there for a long long time and this is not healthy.

A Vella

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:12

Totally agree, who the heck do they think they are? I ask for the resignation of all the committee. Since thay did not taken the right decision they are equally involved. I am ready to start a petition on this. Sports must always be clean from everything.

Pavlaki Pano Aroditis

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:48

Absolutely correct. By supporting the two accused officials, the MOC has indicated that it sees nothing wrong in what they did. The MOC has lost the public's trust. Now, we insist not just on the resignation of the 2 officials but of the whole committee. Here is the link to the MOC website: http://www.nocmalta.org/page.asp?p=4756&l=1
Furthermore, the institutional sponsors should withdraw support.

Jay Oatmon

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:49

I agree of course the lower ranks will support their bosses or they will be kicked out themselves.

International organisations (especially the IOC which has had previous scandals from corrupt African high ups) tend not to turn a blind eye to corruption - unlike Malta which often refuses to see corruption.

Francis Raeymaekers

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:44

No. They can't smell the coffee, but we, the people can smell the rot!

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 20:40

You do realise that in most cases that these people devote their own time and effort.. and they the accused have been accused of what? No money changed hands, they just gave advice which was rather selectively published.

All committee and council members are elected, so all of you nay sayers had a chance to stand up and be counted. Where were you then?

Francis Raeymaekers

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:46

The only decent way out is for those involved to crawl back under the rock from whence they came!

Mr Tony Gatt

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:08

Usually these reporters pretend to be someone other than what they really are, and record conversations secretly, so the people being set up are not aware of what's happening at the time.

Michael Seychell

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:24

They have been named and rebuked by the International Olympic Committee. In the case of the Hon. Judge if he can be called so considering that he defied repeated calls to resign from the MOC position, the only way out for him is resigning his judicary post, or be impeached by Parliament on the recomendation of the justice commission.

Michael Seychell Tal-Pieta

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:45

A long time ago the Committee for the Adminstration of Justice condemned Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco but he despised that warning and has now attained new heights of insolence towards our prime minister and international notoriety tarnishing the reputation of us all by association. Does that make you happy?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:00

One is to be considered innocent until proven guilty is a legal maxim that has nothing to do with democracy. The word democracy is being bandied about as an excuse to justify all sorts of unethical conduct by the few at the expense of society as a whole.

Francis Raeymaekers

Dec 22nd 2012, 13:46

L.F.
Have you ever been to Malta?

Joseph Aquilina

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:17

I do not agree with you. Action was taken by parliament in order to make it loud and clear that Malta and the Maltese to not agree with such practices. Now the ball is with the Commission for the Administration of Justice. I hope that these will take a responsible decision and one that makes Malta and the Maltese proud!

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:41

And if they are innocent?

Gilbert Busuttil

Dec 22nd 2012, 12:42

@James Wightman

Innocent or not....he shouldn't hold the position of president if he's a judge. The commission had already pointed it out some years ago but he's arrogant enough to stay on. RESIGN.

Anthony Agius

Dec 23rd 2012, 00:31

@ james wightman, if they are innocent they can contest the next elections, in the meantime they can stop embarassing us! Is Anglu Farrugia the only honourable gentleman on this rock?

Michael Seychell

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:32

F. Farrugia The MOC did not sit on the fence as you said, but did much worce than that. The have passed a motion of confidence in the the Chairman and the Secretary.

Michael Seychell Tal-Pieta.

James Wightman

Dec 22nd 2012, 11:42

So they employ the Times reporters? Wow the world really did end yesterday!

Daniel Goggi

Dec 22nd 2012, 21:34

May I correct you.. that us not a democratic principle.. it is the presumption of innocence.. the word democracy does not fit in everything...

Advert
Advert