Chief judge laments muzzled watchdog
Journalists had secretly filmed Maltese officials
Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri (right) with Judge Lino Farrugia Sacco ( left) during the opening of the forensic season. Photo: Matthew Mirabelli
Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri has lamented the “unhappy state of affairs” with the Commission for the Administration of Justice being unable to make statements in the face of allegations about a member of the judiciary.
He would not confirm or deny whether the Commission was looking into allegations against Mr Justice Lino Farrugia Sacco, in light of the censure the Maltese judge received from the International Olympic Committee’s Ethics Commission in his capacity as Malta Olympic committee president.
The Chief Justice said that the law binds the Commission to secrecy. But he made clear that he was not pleased with the situation. “I know this is an unhappy state of affairs. It is not a situation I am happy with and I have already said, in speeches I made, that the situation within the Commission needs to be reviewed. For as long as the situation stays as it is, however, I will respect the law,” he said.
The comment comes after the IOC’s ethics body on Thursday rapped Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco and Joe Cassar – the president and general secretary of the MOC – for engaging in a conversation with undercover journalists posing as ticket agents looking to circumvent the official sales mechanism for the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, Russia.
The journalists, from The Sunday Times of London, secretly filmed a conversation with Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco and Mr Cassar.
With regard only to Mr Cassar, the IOC commission said that by explaining “which means could be used to get around the mechanism”, he helped to prove the journalists’ point that the sports world and those who work for it “are prepared to violate the rules”.
“As a result, Mr Cassar helped the reputation of the Olympic movement to be tarnished,” it said.
When the allegations first surfaced in June, Justice Minister Chris Said had written to the Commission requesting an investigation, in light of Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco’s position as a judge.
President George Abela, who heads the Commission, later announced that he had abstained because he had represented the judge as legal counsel in the past.
Nothing else about the matter has been heard since. However, on Friday the Nationalist Party called on the judge to resign, while Dr Said declared that he would not “hesitate” to move an impeachment motion if the Commission found grounds to do so.
Sources have told The Sunday Times that a hearing is taking place but could not give any information on its status.
The Commission, which in the absence of the President will be chaired by the Chief Justice, acts very much like a court in which a judge or magistrate facing the proceedings would make a defence plea, often aided by a lawyer.
Asked if the Commission would be making a statement, the Chief Justice said: “If there is a development that the Commission feels it can make a statement on, it will make a statement, but if there is nothing it means there isn’t something that the Commission feels it can make a statement on.”
Mr Farrugia Sacco has denied any wrongdoing but has been unavailable for questions, as has Mr Cassar.
However, David Farrugia Sacco, the judge’s son and lawyer, said the legal team would be evaluating the matter over the weekend.
Five years ago, the Commission for the Administration of Justice had ruled that Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco was in breach of the judiciary’s code of ethics as long as he remained president of the Malta Olympic Committee.
The code of ethics, a non-binding set of principles, states that members of the judiciary “cannot hold any position, even if temporary, voluntary or honorary, and neither can they carry out any activity which, in the view of the commission... may compromise their position, duties or functions”.
However, Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco remained in his position on the MOC after disagreeing with the council’s ruling.
To date, there has never been a successful impeachment of a member of the judiciary.
In the early 1990s a motion to impeach Magistrate Carol Peralta over allegations that he was a freemason was withdrawn after he made a declaration saying that he had acted as a lawyer for a lodge before being appointed to the bench but was not actually a member.
A decade later, in 2001, a vote on the impeachment of Judge Anton Depasquale failed to achieve the required two-thirds majority after the Labour Opposition voted against it because it disagreed with the procedure used.
Dr Depasquale had conscientiously objected and did not attend court for almost seven years in protest at the 1994 law setting up the Commission for the Administration of Justice, which he considered to be unconstitutional.
In 2002, impeachment proceedings had started against Noel Arrigo and Patrick Vella, then Chief Justice and judge respectively, when they were accused (later convicted) of taking a bribe to reduce the prison sentence of a drug trafficker. However they resigned before they could face impeachment.
European Olympic Committees ‘support’ those implicated
A board representing European Olympic Committees yesterday pledged its “unanimous support” to those rapped by an ethics commission of the parent International Olympic Committee.
The statement takes the side of six officials from Malta, Greece, Lithuania and Serbia.
The EOC’s executive board said at the end of a three-day conference in Rome that it had reservations about the lack of opportunity given to those concerned to appear before the full membership of the IOC Ethics Commission.
Malta was represented at the conference by the two men named by the IOC, Malta Olympic Committee president Lino Farrugia Sacco and its general secretary Joe Cassar.
The EOC also expressed reservations about the process of “entrapment” (the members were secretly filmed by journalists from The Sunday Times of London posing as ticket agents) through which evidence was obtained, and the lack of legal representation. The EOC President has now been asked to make representations to the president of the IOC.
Mr Justice Farrugia Sacco is a prominent member of the EOC, holding the chairmanship of the Audit Committee of the European Olympic Committees Association and that of the Co-ordination Commission of the International Committee of the Mediterranean Games.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Grech Attard
Dec 9th 2012, 16:47
Franco Debono is, once more, right. The procedure whereby a judge is appointed by a simple majority, but needs two-thirds majority of parliament to be removed, gives rise to abuse. It needs to be changed as soon as possible. Why did not government intervene when it was shown that Farr-Sacco held a post which was 'against the rules?' Because, as with many other things that do not make sense, .....?
GL Calleja
Dec 9th 2012, 16:15
First of all thanks to the media for exposing this incident otherwise it would have been swept under the carpet like any other. If these people are found guilty of any infraction about shaming <alta and the Maltese people they should be fired and not allowing them to resign. Resigning is for gentlemen and we have very few of them around. Japanese who shame their country usually commit Hari-Kari.
A Mifsud
Dec 9th 2012, 14:08
"A board representing European Olympic Committees yesterday pledged its “unanimous support” to those rapped by an ethics commission of the parent International Olympic Committee."
What a surprise! The old boys club rallying together.
A Vella
Dec 9th 2012, 11:16
So if I understand well, once you're a judge you become a member of a clan that does not answer to anyone or any institution. It reminds me of other clans in our neighbour Italy and especially in Sicily. I do not think that the comission affords to act this way, given the events that surrounded two main members not so long ago. My respect to this commission and its members is nonexistent.
Jay Oatmon
Dec 9th 2012, 14:55
I agree - what we have in Malta is snouts in the trough and incompetence from the untouchables.
Joe Spiteri Gauci
Dec 9th 2012, 11:04
Sur Imhallef Farrugia Sacco, mhux ahjar tirrizenja u turi lil poplu li int bniedem etiku ...
A. Borg
Dec 9th 2012, 17:44
Mela hawn politici li mhumiex etiki !
Victor Zammit
Dec 9th 2012, 10:06
Perhaps the Commission should not act as a court. That was a reason why a former judge subject to impeachment refused to recognise it. It is solely parliament to judge and impeach or otherwise. The Commission is to recommend impeachment if it finds for one. Nor I think should the President be its president. He is already in Parliament. Besides, it could be a source of embarrassment.
Please choose the reason of your report below: