Advert

Washington gays licensed to wed

Hundreds of same-sex couples across Washington state collected licences as a voter-approved law legalising gay marriage took effect.

King County, the state's biggest, opened the doors to its auditor's office in Seattle just after midnight yesterday to start distributing marriage licences. But hundreds had lined up hours earlier, with a queue snaking around the building on a chilly December night. By the afternoon, about 450 licences had been issued.

Last month Washington, Maine and Maryland became the first states to pass same-sex marriage by popular vote. They joined six other states - New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont - and the District of Columbia that had already enacted laws or issued court rulings permitting the union.

Washington governor Chris Gregoire and secretary of state Sam Reed certified the election results of Referendum 74 on Wednesday afternoon and the law took effect at 12.01am yesterday.

The referendum had asked voters to either approve or reject the state law legalising same-sex marriage passed earlier this year. That law was signed by Mr Gregoire in February but was put on hold pending the outcome of the election. Nearly 54% of voters approved the measure.

Because the state has a three-day waiting period, the earliest that weddings can take place is Sunday.

"We waited a long time. We've been together 35 years, never thinking we'd get a legal marriage. Now I feel so joyous I can't hardly stand it," said 85-year-old Pete-e Petersen, who with her partner, Jane Abbott Lighty, 77, were the first to get a licence in Seattle.

After meeting 35 years ago on a blind date in Sacramento, the couple will get married on Sunday.

The law does not require religious organisations or churches to perform marriages and nor subject churches to penalties if they do not marry gay or lesbian couples.

Advert

10 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Arthur Soler

Dec 7th 2012, 23:48

Seems to me that it’s you that is making a fool of yourself. By the way, yes indeed gay couples who are in a stable and loving relationship should be allowed to adopt children. Current research indicates that such an arrangement is not detrimental to children.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100831091240.htm

Mr C Galea

Dec 8th 2012, 00:43

And why not ? They have proven to be good at that. Have you heard?

A Spiteri

Dec 7th 2012, 12:07

Who are you to judge? If you don't like it don't look, marriage is between two people which love each other unconditionally, they could be 2 men, 2 women or a man and a woman it doesn't make a difference!

A Aquilina

Dec 7th 2012, 13:54

your statement does not make anything less than making a mockery out of yourself! ..live your life how you'd like to live it, but stop impeding other people's lives.

Anthony Galea

Dec 8th 2012, 08:05

Impeding lives, A Aquilina? What, are we likely to burst into the Governor's office in Washington and order him to nullify the law?

Of course not, we're just expressing an opinion. It's about time you learned to respect that there are people whose views differ to yours, they're valid citizens too, and they have a right to make their voice heard.

A Aquilina

Dec 8th 2012, 13:05

Speaking about rights Mr. Galea? In fact, civil marriage is a right that should cater for every loving couple irrelevant or their gender. Let's start from there and then we can speak.

Advert
Advert