Advert

Code of ethics for teachers sets guidelines on private lessons, use of social media

Teachers who give private lessons to pupils who are in their class in a way that takes advantage of their professional relationship may be in breach of a revised code of ethics.

The new code also spells out that teachers need to keep a “professional distance” from their students and avoid inappropriate communication through social media such as Facebook and Twitter.

These are among the new guidelines outlined in the revised Teachers’ Code of Ethics and Practice that was launched this afternoon.

Education Minister Dolores Cristina said the code is the work of her ministry together with the Malta Union of Teachers and the Council for the Teaching Profession in Malta.

She said that one could not tolerate a situation where teachers made a business out of the students in their own classes, but there could be situations where parents insisted that their children go to private lessons with the same teacher they have at school. There could also be situations where pupils were only comfortable with their class teacher.

She said the code formalised what the majority of teachers already put into practice. This was the second revision of the code that was made to keep it up to date with new trends.

Adrian Camilleri, the president of the council, explained that the code was based on six key principles: Maintain trust in the profession, maintain a professional relationship with students, respect the uniqueness and diversity of students, collaborate with colleagues, parents, guardians and carers, act with honesty and integrity and keep their professional knowledge up to date.

Dr Camilleri said that if a teacher breached the code the council had the power to recommend to the minister what action to take. Action could include reprimand and censure.

Ms Cristina added that the council was working on drafting, for the first time, a code of ethics for learning support assistants and kindergarten assistants.

She said that she was currently in discussions with the MUT to explore ways of setting up structures to make schools safer to avoid instances when parents assault teachers. However, she cautioned, such incidents were very rare and one had to go about this sensitively as schools could not be locked up for  parents.

Among other sections, the code lays down that teachers are to:

"Maintain professional boundaries whilst in school and out of school, avoid improper physical contact, avoid inappropriate communication via any form of media and avoid inappropriate relationships with students.

"The members of the teaching profession are duty bound and are ultimately responsible to maintain a professional distance;

"They are to refrain from taking advantage of professional relationships with
students for their own personal benefit, including by giving private lessons to students from the classes they teach or who are under their administrative responsibility, against payment, whether monetary or in kind;

"Teachers are expected to conduct pastoral interventions with students professionally, and behave in keeping with their unique position of trust and status as role models;

"Teachers are expected to follow behaviour management and safe schools policies and guidelines as directed by the relevant school, college and education authorities;

"They are expected to act appropriately towards students exercising care in their language, gestures and attitudes, ensuring that they do not act in such a manner that is embarrassing or disparaging and ensuring that they do not use abusive language or offensive names or make inappropriate remarks; and Act with a professional attitude and behaviour at all times."

The new code can be seen at

Advert

34 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Aldo Portelli

Dec 4th 2012, 08:32

Mr. Fenech I don't think illiteracy is coming from the fact that now we have colleges instead of Junior Lyceums. Its obviously a political comment without any sense in this discussion. The real problem is that some parents still do not see that need of educating their children. For some (and a very few some) school is an unnecessary punishment for the children. Yeh, as if.

Joe Fenech

Dec 4th 2012, 10:26

EVERYTHING we say is political. But political does not mean partisan.

The withdrawal of the JL system, has led to a dramatic drop in educational levels. Bright, hard-working kids are now having to go at the pace of lazy, illiterate kids who in form 3 still can't read. Teachers are having to adapt to the pace of the latter thus hindering the others. That is the tragic reality of Malta!

Christopher Dimech

Dec 3rd 2012, 22:07

You got that right my friend!!!

Martin Bezzina Wettinger

Dec 4th 2012, 06:19

The code of ethics is not prohibiting communicating through social media. It is demanding teachers to maintain professional boundaries. So as long as you take attention that ALL your posts and communications reflect your professional status I do not feel that you are breaking the code of ethics.

Franco Farrugia

Dec 4th 2012, 08:40

Yes, it is important that teachers are careful how they appear on Fb. To me, a seasoned teacher, it is imperative that teachers keep a low profile and keep their students out of their Fb 'friends'. Some of the things you see on Fb does not do honour to the teaching profession. And students need to be told to keep out of teachers' private lives! Nothing less; nothing more.

Franco Farrugia

Dec 4th 2012, 08:49

Of course, this does not preclude teachers from having specially-designated Fb pages where they can professionally interact with their students about their studies. I know for a fact that some things shown by teachers on Fb are downright unprofessional - to say the least.

George Vella

Dec 3rd 2012, 20:24

Well for starters due to the informality to private lessons the respective students will have a more intimate contact with the respective teacher thus allowing a breach of the above stated code.

Mr leo attard

Dec 3rd 2012, 20:44

the difference is that the parents are legally obligated to send their children to school, on the other hand parents send their children to private lessons of their own free will. you dont like a private class of 15 students? then send him elsewhere or nowhere at all

G Schembri

Dec 3rd 2012, 23:01

I never sent my children, who attended government schools, to any private lessons during their primary and Junior Lyceum years, and they did very well. Private lessons are either for students whose parents cannot help them or for parents who want their children to place first or better than their neighbours. In my days private lessons used to have about 6-8 students.

Joe Fenech

Dec 3rd 2012, 23:41

It's a lucrative business and living proof that state schools are a failure! No one who's privately educated will need support lessons.

P Bonnici

Dec 3rd 2012, 21:50

If you demand a receipt, you will be charged more for tax. In the end the student suffers and only well off students can afford private lessons.

Joe Felice-Pace

Dec 3rd 2012, 17:07

No, the giving of private lessons to one's students has not been going on for 25 years. It has been going on since I was at primary school, i.e. the early 1940's, and even before. What has increased since some 25-30 years is its spread.

Franco Farrugia

Dec 3rd 2012, 17:44

Mr Pavia, nobody is forcing you to send children, or go yourself, to private lessons. It's your decision, taken freely. Chip on the shoulder, anyone?

Gordon Farrugia

Dec 3rd 2012, 18:15

Franco its not exactly chip on the shoulder; not when you are a student with a teacher and this same teacher has quite a number of students from your same class going to this teacher's private lessons after-school. As a pupil you feel disadvantaged and feel urged to go as well particularly if you aren't faring that well. It is just unethical to give private lessons to the same students in class.

Mr leo attard

Dec 3rd 2012, 20:50

@gordon farugia -- why unethical? some students are just too slow to cope with the others. now the ministry should have special classes for these students with specially trained teachers. but we dont want streaming . result -- some students want extra help and if they want their class teacher to do so then it's their business!

Gordon Farrugia

Dec 3rd 2012, 22:11

Because not everyone can afford private lessons and having your classmates attending private lessons from the teacher who also happens to give lessons in class puts undue physiological pressure on these same students! Private lessons and exams are all the rage nowadays and its madness because it deprives students of their free time. Perhaps radical changes have to be done in the education system?

Franco Farrugia

Dec 4th 2012, 08:38

Students go to private lessons, mainly because during school-hours they play the fool in class and not pay attention - and then they go to the same teacher for private lessons. Anyway, with the way things are now in the educ. system, it's beyond me what importance end-of-year 'exam' grades have! I was a teacher for 25 yrs and I rarely, if ever, gave private lessons.

Advert
Advert