Updated: Alleged blackmailer gave Rita Schembri 24 hours 'to redeem herself'
The permanent secretary at the Internal Audit and Investigation Department was given 24 hours ‘to redeem herself’ by the man who is being charged with blackmailing her, a court heard today.
Joseph Borg, from Swieqi was denied bail last Saturday, after he was charged with sending a defamatory e-mail in which he allegedly attempted to blackmail Ms Schembri, herself at the centre of an investigation.
Taking the witness stand, Ms Schembri, who is also a member on the supervisory committee of OLAF said she filed a police report on the case on November 21.
She said she was working in Brussels and, in between meetings, checked her email.
Ms Schembri said she was forwarded an email from Mr Borg from the generic mailbox of her department.
The e-mail said: “Rita I'm giving you 24 hours to redeem yourself of all previous michevious conduct before I pass all the details to Olaf.”
She said that she had an issue with Mr Borg in the Civil Courts. He had filed two cases, which were decided in 2006 and 2009 regarding a restaurant she and her husband rented from him in 1995.
Ms Schembri said that, in 1998, her husband decided to slow down and they found two Nigerian partners to help out. In 2009 the Appeals Court decided in favour of the Schembris.
She said that, in 2005, Mr Borg opened another case against them and Omar Granata, who had sublet the restaurant from them.
Asked by prosecutor Inspector Chris Pullicino whether she was ever ordered to pay Mr Borg, Ms Schembri answered “no, never”.
She said she was told that she needed to reimburse the family of Ben Kingsley with €26,000 she took fraudulently from them and felt that she was being blackmailed as she had never been ordered to pay anything.
“It was a very difficult moment for me.”
Ms Schembri told the Courts that Mr Borg to try and inflict maximum damage by reporting her to Olaf.
She said that two days before, Godwin Grima, the head of civil service told her that she failed to inform him that she was being threatened by email. But at that time, she had not yet received the e-mail. An e-mail was also sent to Olaf and they asked for more information.
Ms Schembri said that the Nigerian couple had emigrated and never contacted her. It was Mr Borg who pressured them to take action against the Schembris, she said, adding that they (the Schembris) were being bullied by Mr Borg and she could not understand why he was trying to hurt them.
“This is pure hatred,” she said, adding that people could agree to disagree and stop there.
In cross examination, Ms Schembri said that this was not the first time that she had been threatened by Mr Borg.
Taking the witness stand, Mr Granata said he ran Little Italy in Bugibba, which was the restaurant he had sublet from the Schembris.
He said that when he first met the Schembris. He did not know that they had a pending court issue with Mr Borg. However, when he met Mr Borg, he told him that the restaurant should not have been sublet to him because this was against the contract he had with the Schembris.
He said that in spite of the €28,000 he had paid the Schembris in key money, he had to vacate the place following a court appeal judgement Mr Borg had in a case against the Schembris.
Mr Granata said that in 2009 he made a new contract with Mr Borg who asked him why he was not trying to get his money back from the Schembris. He said he told him he had o faith in the justice system. This statement elicited a smile from Magistrate Anthony Vella.
Mr Granata said that when the John Dalli case came up about a month ago, he recalled telling Mr Borg that the Schembris still owed him money. He told him that he wanted his money back but he never said that he was afraid of the Schembris.
Replying to questions by Dr Debono, Mr Granata denied that he was approached by Mr Mark Schembri to kill Mr Borg.
Taking the witness stand, Simon Balzan, Mr Borg’s son-in-law, said he had a restaurant opposite Mr Granata’s. He said Mr Granata’s brother Chris, who is a policeman, told him that Mr Granata had told him that he was approached by Mr Schembri who said let’s get €10,000 together to get someone to beat up Mr Borg and throw him into the sea.
Magistrate Anthony Vella said he could not understand how this policeman knew about this allegation and did not make a police report about it.
Mr Borg, who is being represented by Lawyer Edward Debono, has now been granted bail against a deposit of €2,000 and a personal guarantee of €8,000.
27 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Mr M Spiteri
Nov 29th 2012, 21:26
How can one be found to be liable if he exposed the truth?
Alfred G Grech
Nov 29th 2012, 19:36
The e-mail said: “Rita I'm giving you 24 hours to redeem yourself of all previous mischevious conduct before I pass all the details to Olaf.” If the word "before" is intended as "or else" it is probably blackmail. If it is intended as a time reference than it is him giving her advance notice of his intention to pass on the details.
mark borg
Nov 29th 2012, 19:05
x bidla radikali hawn bzonn f din in naqra ta gzira
Alfred Vassallo
Nov 29th 2012, 17:19
Goodness, what comes out of court cases leaves one speechless!
pat muscat
Nov 29th 2012, 17:00
So if I ask someone to pay his dues to me-official debt- I would be blackmailing him? This is news to me.
mark borg
Nov 29th 2012, 21:39
if that person forms part of the clique yes ,Pat....this is Malta under gonzipn 2012
S. Camilleri
Nov 29th 2012, 16:32
From what has been published in the Press ... All I can see is a potential 'Whistle Blower' and certainly NOT a black mailer!!!
Freda Busuttil
Nov 29th 2012, 17:29
I agree 100%
j brincat
Nov 29th 2012, 16:15
Thought that these stories happen only in the movies!
(jb)
John Gatt
Nov 29th 2012, 16:05
Will the commissioner of police take action agiantst this policeman who 'knew' about a crime and did nothing about it?
Igota Schlong
Nov 29th 2012, 20:25
What Commissioner?
Mr Andrew Camilleri
Nov 29th 2012, 16:03
I cannot understand where the blackmail or the libel lies. Is it blackmail to insist with someone to pay up her dues or else he will take action? Is it libel to send a rude email to one person - which email no one else but sender and receiver have seen? I just cannot underdstand why the police where so quick to take action and why. They need to assure us that there was no pressure from upstairs
Joseph Grech Attard
Nov 29th 2012, 14:47
It seems that a lot of things happen to persons working in Bruxelles of which we are never aware! And this from a tiny little island of 400,000 inhabitants! No wonder certain people were (and some still are) so eager to join the EU, rain or shine; and not only from Malta!
Jeffrey Mallia
Nov 29th 2012, 14:29
She reported the case on the 21st November, and procedures started a day later........Why are some few people in this country treated far much better than the rest ??
GL Calleja
Nov 29th 2012, 15:59
Because of politics, money and nepotism. If it was anybody else it would not have mattered much. Somebody should be investigating thoroughly the why and the how.
Alfred Falzon
Nov 29th 2012, 14:18
Can someone explain how did Dr Grima know ( as reported above) that Ms Schembri was being threatened by email two days before she actually did receive the e-mail?
Lawrence Attard
Nov 29th 2012, 15:00
Borg reported to OLAF, and since Schembri was abroad the email sent by Borg went to a generic email and was uploaded to her by her staff. Therefore she missed out the "deadline " set and was read by Olaf prior to her. Olaf as is procedure contacted Dr Grima who queried with Schembri. Capice?
Alfred Falzon
Nov 29th 2012, 17:17
Mr Attard. Thank you for the clarification.
Mr Duncan Scerri
Nov 29th 2012, 14:10
"...adding that they (the Schembris) were being bullied by Mr Borg and she could not understand why he was trying to hurt them."
Take a lesson from JPO and...cue tears!
Lawrence Attard
Nov 29th 2012, 14:08
id-decizjonijiet tal-qrati jghidu differenti, fil-fatt l-kawzi tilfuhom it-tnejn. Forsi anki il-memorja? sakemm mhix qed tinheba war il-fatt li il-kawza kienet miftuha minn kumpanija (ta' Borg). Jidher milli intqal fil-gurnali li tant insiet li ma' halsuwx il-flus lill minn rebhielhom il-kawza. Minn justice.gov.mt tkun taf kwazi kollox... ftit pacenzja u perseverita tfitx trid. Irrezenja !
J Martinelli
Nov 29th 2012, 13:42
Another 'hidden hand' exposed?
Joe A. Borg
Nov 29th 2012, 13:38
On the same logical reasoning with the Dalligate case, Ms Schembri is guilty on circumstantial evidence and thus should resign!
Or do we live in a two weights, two measures world?
Peter Murray
Nov 29th 2012, 13:56
Sorry Joseph but just checked with the Maltese Lexicon apllicable in Malta and cannot ;locate the word.....resign?Also why give her the chance to redeem herself as the law will do that with an appropriate sentence(hopefully) if found giulity.
John Joseph Cefai
Nov 29th 2012, 14:04
Firstly, Dr. Schembri has resigned pending an investigation. Secondly, 'guilty' as you put it, of what exactly?
Martin Saliba
Nov 29th 2012, 14:14
Wrong JJC she is on leave .
GL Calleja
Nov 29th 2012, 16:01
@ Martin Saliba
with full pay I presume?
S. Camilleri
Nov 29th 2012, 16:34
She is to leave... There is too much Circumstantial Evidence for comfort.
Please choose the reason of your report below: