Advert

Updated: Good Budget feeling tempered by uncertainty

Video: Mark Zammit Cordina

Unions and employers were given heads up on the Budget by Finance Minister Tonio Fenech this morning... and at the end of it they seemed pleased.

The two-hour presentation to the Malta Council for Economic and Social Development, a forum for social partners, was delivered a day before Mr Fenech reads out the last Budget of this administration.

The minister is expected to partially fulfill an electoral pledge to lower the top income tax rate by spreading out the reduction over three years.

But a dark shadow hangs over the Budget after backbencher Franco Debono said he will vote against.

The threat did not go unnoticed in the meeting with Stefano Mallia from the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Enterprise telling journalists after, it was important the country woke up on January 1 with an approved Budget.

He called on MPs to put the national interest first and do away with the uncertainty.

The concern was also raised by UHM general secretary Josef Vella.

Union leaders were generally pleased but GWU general secretary Tony Zarb expressed disappointment because the Minister ignored three quarters of his union's proposals.

The social partners agreed that all depended on the final outcome of tomorrow's Budget, which Mr Fenech said will continue to be fine-tuned till the last minute.

Mr Fenech described the meeting as positive and said he took note of some concerns raised. He is expected to brief Cabinet later on this morning on the Budget.

Advert

24 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

William Caligari

Nov 27th 2012, 19:31



@ Angelo Vassallo,

ibqa zomm mal-verzjoni tieghek, kif sa' naghmel jien.

J Martinelli

Nov 27th 2012, 14:30

".. the promise to lower the TAX rate to 25% was not delivered in full during this legislature"
And the world didn't end even if so predicted several times in the last 10 years. But a world financial crisis did occur forcing a change in plans. So, had Joseph been PM would he have still lowered the Income Tax? Would he have left some in one pocket and taken more from your other?
Some economist!

Joseph Grech Attard

Nov 27th 2012, 15:24

Such a situation would have never occured if JM was PM. He would not have never let corruption reign, despite a 6 billion Euro debt, most of which was used to please extreme Capiitalism of a cliique. And this did not happen only in Malta. Hence the international crisis.!!!

Nazzareno Cortis

Nov 27th 2012, 15:40

Martinell-----perhaps and if ----according to your question-----"So, had Joseph been PM"------the probability would be that the nation would not have a debt of 5000,0000,000 ewros !!! So I think yes--he would probanly have lowered the income tax rate!!!!
Look at the present gov. he is binding the next gov.for the next three years to complete his 2008 promise!!! This sure is not fair!!!

Lawrence Borg

Nov 27th 2012, 12:31

So you think that the nationalist media will not try to spin the fact that labour will vote against the budget because they 'dont have the national interest at heart'?

J Martinelli

Nov 27th 2012, 14:41

You are right Lawrence. If the Budget is good and makes sense under present circumstances, Labour would be spiteful if it votes against it. It may be politically permissible but it would still be morally and economically wrong. It doesn't take any spin by anyone to see that denying a good Budget is like putting a gun at taxpayers' heads.
A Labour govt would be expected to do better. Can it?

Joseph Grech Attard

Nov 27th 2012, 15:29

There is not one single budget that suits both sides of the house! If therenis, then we should,have a National Government from both sides of the house. That happens only during wartime. There were many social laws voted against byt the PN - income tax, vote for women, vote at 18, children's allowance, free university, pensions, etc. The PL would do a big mistake if it votes with the government.

Mr G Naudi

Nov 27th 2012, 12:30

Stefano Mallia is correct in what he said. This is not a matter of PN or LP. if a budget is good for you, me, our families, neighbours and all alike why should we kick it out of the window just for spite! Any opposition will never back a budget being it LP or PN or abroad but what he asked is for FD not to vote against for the sake of the people. Elections are going to happen in March xorta!

Advert
Advert