PM: EU funding data may have to be reworked using 2010 figures
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi said today that the government has not accepted the EU argument that Malta does not qualify for Objective 1 status within the European Union. Furthermore, he said, once there was no agreement on the EU budget, the data for the calculation of Objective 1 status may have to be reworked, using 2010 figures.
Replying to questions from Labour MPs after delivering a statement to the House on last week's EU summit, Dr Gonzi said the cut-off date for the calculation of Objective 1 status had been 2009. If the talks continued into the new year and 2010 became the cut-off year, things may change since several countries had gone into crisis in 2010 because of the international financial situation.
Malta, therefore would await the final data, but if it did not qualify for Objective 1, it would continue to insist on transitory measures since one could not immediately suffer the economic shock of seeing a sharp drop in funding.
Objective 1 status is granted to countries whose development is inferior to 75% of the EU average. Such countries would be eligible for the highest rate of EU assistance.
Dr Gonzi explained that during the summit, Malta had been offered a €200m once only top-up of the funds it would be eligible for if it did not achieve Objective One status. Malta's position was that this was an improvement, but more should be done.
Malta was making the point, he said, that it was the only country which had benefited from Objective One for only one programming period and therefore deserved transitory provisions.
Dr Gonzi said nothing was assured yet, not even the €200m transition, although it was unlikely to be reduced. He said Malta was also arguing that Gozo as a region should continue to benefit from Objective 1 status and the issue was being further discussed.
On the use of the current funding for Malta, Dr Gonzi said that Malta was among the countries which were absorbing the highest rate of funds allocated to them. He was confident that all the available funds would be used.
Replying to points raised by Alfred Sant on Malta's level of contributions, Dr Gonzi said formulae were still being worked out and he was hopeful that the ultimate result of the talks would be favourable and Malta's net balance would by better than at the start of the talks.
Dr Gonzi said he could understand that contributor countries wanted to see their funds put to good use. When such funds were put to good use and the economies of the other countries grew, the creditor countries would benefit too. However those who wanted cutbacks, including in the administration of the EU, had to keep in mind the increasing demands which were being made, including the accession of Croatia.
Replying to other questions on the presence of Richard Cachia Caruana at the summit talks, Dr Gonzi said Mr Cachia Caruana been involved in the Budget talks from the outset, It was mostly to his credit that Malta was allocated almost €1 billion in the current programming period. The national interest demanded that his experience should not be lost and he had therefore asked him to stay on as consultant. Mr Cachia Caruana had wanted to leave after the Parliamentary vote, but had stayed on without remuneration other than to cover his costs. The country, Dr Gonzi said, should be grateful.
12 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Mercieca
Nov 27th 2012, 09:02
Gonzi is quoted as saying" Malta was allocated almost €1 billion in the current (EU) programming period." When will this guy stop lying. The actual allocation is euro700million a difference of euro300million.
ANTHONY PAVIA
Nov 27th 2012, 11:33
I would also be extremely interested to be informed what our contribution amounted to. That way I would gauge the net benefit.
Charles Cremona
Nov 26th 2012, 22:10
One minute they say we are now one of the best developed EU nations and the next minute they say we are still considered as least developed and as such we should qualify for objective 1 rates of aid money, can Gonzi PN please make up his mind are we classed as a developed nation in which case we are not entitled to any aid or are we still classed as undeveloped in which case we should more aid.
Denis Pace
Nov 27th 2012, 08:22
Mr.Cremona.
Please check facts before you write.
The level is based on an EU average..After accession of Romania and Bulgaria, the average dropped....hence the result.....
Victor Laiviera
Nov 26th 2012, 21:34
Riccardo Carvanus - Santo Subito!
If Richard Cachia Caruana had stuck to his job as an Ambassador instead of playing partisan politics, he would be still in place.
O Kassar
Nov 26th 2012, 20:23
It is a shame for Labour and their journalists to continue to persecute Richard Cachia Caruana. He is an asset for Malta and I can understand why the PM involves him in such crucial talks. Labour's vengeance is on the people of Malta because after all, it's the Maltese people who would loose if Mr Cachia Caruana's skills at negotiation are not utilised in Brussels.
John Gatt
Nov 26th 2012, 19:54
If labour really had Malta's interest at hearty, they would not have voted against Richard Cachia Caruana. But labour is only interested in power.
Paul Bajada
Nov 26th 2012, 20:51
It was not Labour who voted RCC out, but the PNs own MPs. Dont expect PL to wash the PNs dirty linen for them.... grow up.
Philip Grech
Nov 26th 2012, 20:52
At least they only voted against him
Paul Gauci
Nov 26th 2012, 21:47
Please give us a break from this 'RCC is god almighty' non-sense!
m. borg (slm)
Nov 26th 2012, 23:12
As if he would have made a difference.
joseph demicoli
Nov 27th 2012, 06:27
look who is talking and what is the PN is the interested for? Answer --cling to power no matter the disaster he did to this country. Now what happens if the famous EU don't give our country the money we are entitled for. I tell you Gonzi PN will bow his head and say thank you because we are servant to foreigners.
Please choose the reason of your report below: