Trade unions and employers express caution on tax cuts
Unions and employers were cautious yesterday when asked for their reaction a tax cut the Government is considering for its last Budget before the election.
Three organisations yesterday insisted they will have to see the whole package presented by the Finance Minister on Wednesday before commenting about a specific proposal to lower income tax.
The Sunday Times revealed that the Government may start delivering on its pledge to lower the top rate to 25 per cent from 35 per cent by spreading out the reduction over three years.
But Joe Farrugia, director general of the Malta Employers’ Association, insisted he first had to know whether the measure will be implemented before commenting.
“I have not seen any public commitment yet,” Mr Farrugia said, adding the Finance Minister had not raised the matter during meetings of the Malta Council for Economic and Social Development.
The social partners will be briefed about the Budget on Tuesday, 24 hours before it is delivered.
Mr Farrugia said the MEA had proposed changes to the tax bands that would have little impact on Government revenue because they would help draw money out of the black economy.
He insisted that any decision to lower taxes had to be taken with the deficit in mind. “Deficit reduction has to remain a priority, especially with the debt levels as they are,” he added, noting that any move to cut taxes or tweak them had to be viewed as part of a package and not in isolation. His sentiments were shared by the leaders of the two largest unions.
Tony Zarb, general secretary of the GWU, said he was disappointed to learn of the proposed tax cuts from The Sunday Times and not at the MCESD.
“The GWU has to see the whole Budget before commenting on one measure,” he said, adding the MCESD meeting scheduled for Tuesday allowed little time for discussion on the Budget measures.
UĦM secretary general Josef Vella said his union was not against a reduction in taxes but insisted on knowing the full details of how it will be implemented.
“We have to see what it means within the context of the whole picture. This is why I am cautious because we have other problems such as pensions that have to be financed in some way,” Mr Vella said.
The Sunday Times quoted sources saying that the Finance Ministry was conducting simulation exercises to determine whether the 10 point cut will be spread over three years, starting with a three point reduction in the first year. Another option is to cut the tax rate by five points, two years in a row.
It is unclear though whether the tax cut will apply across the board or target taxpayers with children, who were already given a preferential parent rate last year.
The tax cut would most likely be accompanied by an increase in excise taxes to make up for the shortfall in revenue.
9 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Robert Pace Bonello
Nov 26th 2012, 18:36
Gonzipn has been criticized for not fulfilling a tax cut as promised in the electoral programme. Sensible people can not but agree that this was the right decision. One wonders what these critics would have said had Gonzipn actually reduced the tax rate for the higher earners! Now it appears that this is to be included in the upcoming budget Gonzipn is being criticized for proposing it!
George Calleja
Nov 26th 2012, 16:04
How funny this little Malta is. When the budget day approaches, all of us want more goodies, much less tax, increased salaries, less utility bills, more children allowance etc. But very few realise that every government can only give of what he has and surely not increasing the public debts. Can we be more reasonable? Gone are the days when tuna was reduced by half a penny. Don't expect miracles!
R. Borg
Nov 26th 2012, 15:27
The rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer
Ronnie Callus
Nov 26th 2012, 15:14
This reduction in tax from 35% to 25% is only beneficial to the rich high class people. The more they have the more they are given.This is the same as the 500euro weekly increase by the Ministers taken behind our backs.To be fare the tax reduction (if it could be done) should be across the board not for the TOP ONES.The top ones should be made to pay more from a certain amount of income and over.
Colin Camilleri
Nov 26th 2012, 14:13
Income tax reductions for the rich compensated with excise tax increases for the masses, including the poor! Nice one Dr. Fenech!
Norman E Grech
Nov 26th 2012, 14:12
This is yet another attempt to save face!
The present government has long embarked on a 'damage limitation' campaign!
The question is, will the public be lured to yet another 5 years with PN at the helm?
Have the people learnt their lesson?
Tarcisio Bonello
Nov 26th 2012, 11:39
I feel that giving the 'poverty' situation an increase in the untaxable income band limit would actually make more sense.
Godfrey Camilleri
Nov 26th 2012, 10:41
How many families exceed €19,500 if opting for a single computation, or €39,000 for the couple or €28,700 if married with one partner not working? Only at these brackets does the 35% tax apply. Hence most pensioners are excluded, and these are 25% of the population and so do probably another 50% of the working population. Hence why all the fuss?!
victor caruana
Nov 26th 2012, 09:24
And what about us who never dream of having the chance of paying a 35% tax rate????????
Please choose the reason of your report below: