Advert

Sargas plant ‘could be powered by gas’

Norwegian firm welcomes request for full feasibility study on project

Sargas CEO Henrik Fleischer. Photo: Jason Borg

Sargas CEO Henrik Fleischer. Photo: Jason Borg

Sargas, the Norwegian company proposing a €1 billion investment in a clean energy power plant, yesterday welcomed Malta’s decision to ask it for a full feasibility study, saying the plant could also be run on gas.

We have not given up on Malta in spite of our massive investment programme in other countries

The company’s CEO Henrik Fleischer told The Times he was pleased the Government had conceded that the proposal would translate into cheaper utility tariffs.

The company was now looking forward to further talks.

Mr Fleischer added that Sargas had not yet received a formal request and had learned the news from the media.

“It has taken us over three years to concretise an understanding on feasibility between the parties,” Mr Fleischer said from his Oslo office.

He said the technology was being set up in several countries, particularly the US, adding: “We have not given up on Malta in spite of our massive investment programme in other countries.”

Mr Fleischer made it clear that Sargas was willing to address all the issues identified by a pre-feasibility study commissioned by the Government from KPMG.

The project offered to Malta, he underlined, was not intrinsically linked to biomass or coal as a fuel but gas was also “a veritable possibility.”

The Sargas technology would lead to “near zero emissions” and the carbon capture technology would put Malta at the forefront of environmental conservation. Martin Roden, director for business development, said the company hoped to have further discussions with Enemalta soon in order to decide the way forward.

Introduced to the Government and the Opposition by former European Commissioner John Dalli, the Norwegian company is proposing a €1 billion coal-fired, barge-mounted steam plant drydocked at Marsaxlokk Bay and capable of producing energy at a much lower cost than current rates.

In exchange, the company wants Enemalta to enter into a 30-year power purchasing supply agreement with it.

The issue had become a political hot potato, with the Opposition accusing the Prime Minister of ignoring the proposal and the Government saying Labour wanted to revert to the use of coal.

On Tuesday, the Government said there were many questions still to be answered following the pre-feasibility study and it wanted the company to do a fully-fledged feasibility study if Enemalta was to keep the project under consideration.

KPMG identified some major issues that need to be assessed in much more detail, among them the fuel use (coal and biopaste), the carbon capture and storage technology, maritime issues and environmental considerations.

Advert

42 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Tony Borg

Nov 22nd 2012, 20:38

Well in your calculation you forgot to include that the bulk of electricity in Malta is not consumed by the public but by industry, hotels and other commercial properties.

Anthony Paris

Nov 22nd 2012, 14:28

Yes you are missing 157 million euro

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 22nd 2012, 15:31

David, don't get over excited!!

Anthony Scicluna

Nov 22nd 2012, 16:36

You need to think with your head, mate. Do you think that a company can guarantee an investment for 30 years with a commodity such as gas or oil? What happens if prices double in the next ten years? The indications from FT and other international papers suggest that. What happens if a cheaper source of supply appears in 15 years? You must have no clue in business

J Tabone

Nov 22nd 2012, 12:35

That 1 billion is payable over 30 years and the initial investment is SARGAS's! Do we have ANY guarantee that the BWSC's generators will last 30 years? Nobody on earth gives you that guarantee. SARGAS does as it wants a contract with Enemalta for that at least that period of time. That will guarantee cheaper utility rates than those we "enjoy" at present! And there is a choice of fuel!

carlos ellul

Nov 22nd 2012, 11:47

It wouldnt have been :Smart:. With so many :Smart: people leading us in all facts of life (immigration, energy etc) who needs the PL?

R. Azzopardi

Nov 22nd 2012, 12:19

Taf x'inhi d-differenza? Li tal-BWSC sewa 157 miljun, tas-Sargas, tajba kemm hi tajba, tiswa daqqa ta BILJUN!!!! Mnejn se ngibu?

Brian Gatt

Nov 22nd 2012, 13:16

I Stand to be corrected but if I understood the above article correctly Sargas will be forking out the costs (1Billion) for the plant if we enter in a 30yr Purchasing agreement with them. So if this was implemented 3 yrs ago We would have had cheaper bills, cleaner air & the Govt would have still 157Million to invest elsewhere..Another job well done by GonziPn proset

Anthony Paris

Nov 22nd 2012, 13:53

Mr.Gatt, you are very wrong. If Sargas was chosen 3 years ago, only the Maltese public would have benefitted. With BWSC the blue eyed boys got the benefit, and the rule is, "Blue eyed boys first" not "Malta first". I am sure you are a law abiding citizen and would not want to break the rule.

Martin Busuttil

Nov 22nd 2012, 15:31

@R. Azzopardi

Lil pajjiz mhu se tiswih xejn, ghax Sargas se jaghmlu l-investiment huma, u l-Enemalta tidhol fi ftehim maghhom, u ahna niggwadanjaw billi nhallsu kontijiet irhas tad-dawl.
Fil-waqt li tal-BWSC swit 157 miljun, u rridu nhallsuhom ahna bil-kontijiet gholjin. L-aqwa li paxxejna lil min ha 'commission' ta' xi 4 miljuni, u kuntrattur li sibnih fuq il-yellow pages.

Marco Galea

Nov 22nd 2012, 12:08

ija? u l-1 billion min ha jhallasom?

R. Azzopardi

Nov 22nd 2012, 12:21

@Marco Galea

Dawk gejjin mill-arja! Dawn nies ma tfehmhom b'xejn. Dawn kienu nies li jonfqu lm600 biex jiffittjaw magna diesel fuq karozza biex "jiffrankaw" il-fuel. Qatt ma tghaddilhom minn rashom li biex tifdi "l-investiment" iridu jghaddu hames snin jew aktar.

Eddy Privitera

Nov 22nd 2012, 12:24

Marco Galea: L-investiment johorguh SARGAS Hekk niftar li kienu qalu xhur ilu meta John Dalli kien semmieha l-ewwel wiehed. Fill-fatt John Dalli kien ressaq dan il-progett lil Dr. Gonzi, izda ghal xi raguni stramba, intefa fil-kexxun !

Frans Aguis

Nov 22nd 2012, 13:18

@Marco
"Presented last week by Sargas CEO Henrik Fleischer, the plant is estimated to cost between €800m and €900m. The company is proposing to fund the cost of construction itself and guarantee the output price in exchange for a long-term service contract with Enemalta."

Advert
Advert