Advert

Socialist leader explains group's decision

Hannes Swoboda, leader of the socialist group in parliament said today that "Commissioner-designate Tonio Borg left open questions ahead of the vote on his nomination.

Last night the S&D Group voted 62-24 not to support Dr Borg as Commissioner, making the outcome of the vote very uncertain.

Members of the Socialist Group will be free to vote according to their individual assessments of Dr Borg's performance and declarations. The vote will be taken between Noon and 12.15 p.m. and will be carried live on timesofmalta.com

Hannes Swoboda, who had backed Dr Borg, said:

"The S&D Group acknowledges Mr Borg's performance during his hearing and took note of his declaration that his personal views would not interfere with his duties as Commissioner, if appointed. But gender equality and the rights of women and homosexuals are still under fire from a part of Europe's right wing and the S&D Group wants to see the position filled by someone with a track record on respecting and furthering these rights."

Ahead of today's vote in the European Parliament plenary session, he continued:

"Should Mr Borg be confirmed by a majority of the European Parliament, we will co-operate with him in his area of competence. He will then have the duty and opportunity to convince the many citizens who have voiced doubts about his position and his commitment to fundamental rights."

Advert

64 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 22nd 2012, 15:16

Shame for what? For being one of a minority of socialists who exceptionally voted in favour of Malta's nominee as opposed to the main socialists who disregarded even the appeals of the Malta LP MEPs? Whose side are you on?

John Zammit

Nov 21st 2012, 15:35

Don't be naive and keep your self informed. Even the EU socialist did not pay Socialist International

Alex Borg

Nov 21st 2012, 13:46

One man's food is another man's poison, they say. In other word's what is perfectly logical to one person, is illogical to another. But that is why, it is, and should be, a free world. where one is free to express opinions, not insults. FYI the socialist group does not have a majority, so your fear of a socialist totalitarian state is totally unfounded.

Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)

Nov 21st 2012, 12:32

Yep! That is the way the cookie is crumbling... sad but true.

M Borg

Nov 21st 2012, 18:49

Well they have been proved wrong. Dr Borg is against abortion and he still got his place in the EU.

Tony Borg Borg

Nov 21st 2012, 13:51

Mr. Vassallo x'tistena min Socjalist. Jew taqbel maghhom jew ikissruk.

paul camilleri

Nov 21st 2012, 11:58

i would like to correct you Mr Meilak, Mr Dalli did not flea as you claim but was forced out and do you have inside knowledge that Mr Dalli did in fact inadvertently cause the case of fraud on Swedish Tobacco?
as for Dr Borg he is being pelted by the Nordic countries so that this particular tobacco company can get its way and postponing the directive proposed by Dalli.

S Scerri

Nov 21st 2012, 12:19

What does OLAF have to do with Dr. Borg's nomination?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 22nd 2012, 08:36

@SScerri
OLAF did not have anything to do with Dr Borg's nomination. That was the choice of the Malta government. OLAF is mired up to its neck as the cause for the shelving the Smoke Directive whilst the socialist alliance in the EU parliament kept obstructing for as long as possible the confirmation of Dr T Borg.

Giovanni Rizzo

Nov 21st 2012, 11:48

Agree with you Mr. Vassallo.

S Scerri

Nov 21st 2012, 12:20

Iva Grazzi!

J Martinelli

Nov 21st 2012, 13:38

Allura int xi trid, Joseph Galea?

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 21st 2012, 11:08

You mean just like the Nationalists did in denying divorce to married couples who want them?

Peter Murray

Nov 21st 2012, 11:12

The vote will determine whether any reason -valid or not-will be applied as an objection to Borg as Commissioner- so why not just wait and see what the outcome is .

Michael Seychell

Nov 21st 2012, 11:17

Mr Saliba I aagree with you entirerly and add that Angela Merkle was right when she stated that the Christian religion is the most religion which is discriminated against in the whole world.

The reason for this is that Liberals are against the Christian values which in fact represent the natural values of mankind.

Shame on those who will not vote for Dr. Borg.

Michael Seychell Tal-Pieta

Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)

Nov 21st 2012, 12:12

M Seychell: The provenance of liberals is generally Christian and it is against that, that they have built their personal opposition.

Very few dare oppose other religions or even atheism, sometimes because of allegiances but sometimes because of fear of extremism.

They perceive Christians as the quiet minority in proportion to the amalgamated rest. Ergo, they become populist.

Evarist Saliba

Nov 21st 2012, 12:58

@ PM
I have watched the 3 hour grilling, and followed all the statements since then by MEPs. My comments are directed at what transpired all along. Are you suggesting that new valid reasons will emerge at the last minute? I have had long years of experience in multinational international negotiations and I have never seen such shambles as in this case.

Evarist Saliba

Nov 21st 2012, 13:03

@ JCC. The nationalists have denied no one, not even in the case of divorce, the right to hold office for persons promoting a different view. The last time that such a thing happened in Malta was in December 1981 and the 5 years that followed. The nationalists were not responsible.

Joseph Grech Attard

Nov 21st 2012, 11:17

Two wrong things do not make a right!

John L Galea

Nov 21st 2012, 11:19

Whose moral values? I am sure that we have all different moral values.

Paul Meilak

Nov 21st 2012, 11:20

thumbs up !

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 22nd 2012, 15:23

@JosephGrechAttard
Of course two wrongs do not make a right, still less three, four or more wrongs. That did not impede the MLP from wrongfully suppressing a multitude of universal, fundamental human rights of the opposition during the Mintoff-KMB era.

Joseph Grech Attard

Nov 21st 2012, 11:22

Are you sure you are not talking about the PN and GonziPN? If not, just have a look at the 2008 Gonzi PN manifesto and see what ahs been promised and implemented and vice versa. Then one can judge who promises one thing and gives another, the opposite! True Socilaists are contrary to what you said, as are true Conservatives contrary to what GonziPN and PN are!!!

J Martinelli

Nov 21st 2012, 13:47

@ Joseph Attard Grech

Please make a list all the delivered promises and then a list of undelivered promises, otherwise please hush up.
Sant promised removal of VAT and delivered CET. Promised 'safe' stipends and converted them into loans. Free health but charged 50c per doctor's certificate....

But all that is OK because Lejber works that way. Labour won't work.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 21st 2012, 11:10

Read carefully what he said. No one is being discriminated against on the basis of his beliefs. Only on the basis of his track record which does not accord with the values of the EU. After all it was you party that pushed Malta into the EU.

paul camilleri

Nov 21st 2012, 11:50

another ridiculous response , as if the labour party supporters didn't want to join the EU also? otherwise the results of the referendum would have been different, and why is it that the Labour party now after we joined all want in?? knock some sense into your head and comment on facts that has to do with the article and not some idiotic reply as who wanted to join the EU.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 21st 2012, 11:11

No Joseph. You can still be a Catholic. You simply can no longer stuff your values down our throats.

Victor Laiviera

Nov 21st 2012, 11:14

"A Champion of Human rights"? When, specifically?

J Martinelli

Nov 21st 2012, 13:51

@ Victor Laiviera

...since the EU respects human rights a bit better than human rights were respected between 1971 and 1987 in Malta.

Mary Ann Borg

Nov 21st 2012, 10:39

Socjalisti ta' veru dawn, mhux ta' b'xejn is-socjalisti taghna jagixxu bhalhom ezatt. L-ewwel jattakkaw umbghad jiprruvaw jitilghu fuq il-karru. F'dan il-kaz il-Lejber taghna agixxa b'mod tajjeb hafna imma wiehed jinduna kif is-socjalisti huma kollha l-istess u kullimkien.

Peter Murray

Nov 21st 2012, 11:09

There you are Ms Borg spiiting venom at the Socialists once more -as its all their fault.Was I wrong this time around for suggesting caution regarding Dr.Borg's "shoe-in " nomination and that it was by no means a done deal or has your excellent-albeit highly selective-memory failed you on this occasion?Borg may well get in by the back -door but without any shred of self-respect left

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 21st 2012, 16:59

@PeterMurray

What you describe as spat vomit we others identify as a truth that offends you and humiliates you. Dr T Borg did not go in by any back door. He marched in through the front door with head held high having maintained his self respect and his principles throughout until he obtained an absolute majority of 105 votes.

Advert
Advert