Pope's third book on Jesus reaffirms virgin birth
Pope Benedict published the last part of his trilogy on the life of Jesus on today, delivering an early childhood narrative which strongly reaffirms the doctrine of the virgin birth as an "unequivocal" truth of faith.
The book, 137 pages in its English version, is titled "The Infancy Narratives - Jesus of Nazareth" and is being published simultaneously around the world in 21 languages. It is bound to be another international bestseller like the previous volumes.
Divided into a forward, four chapters and an epilogue, it traces and analyses the gospel narratives from the birth of Jesus to his presentation in the temple at the age of 12.
The previous two volumes dealt with the adult life of Jesus and his public ministry.
One section of the book is called "Virgin Birth - Myth or Historical Truth?"
The Church teaches that Jesus was the son of God and was not conceived through sexual intercourse but by the power of the Holy Spirit, one part of the divine trinity.
In simple language that is at once academic but still easily accessible to a non-specialist readership, Benedict says the story of the virgin birth is not just a reworking of earlier Greek or Egyptian legends and archetypal concepts but something totally new in history.
"It is God's creative word alone that brings about something new. Jesus, born of Mary is fully man and fully God, without confusion and without separation..." he writes.
"The accounts of Matthew and Luke are not myths taken a stage further. They are firmly rooted, in terms of their basic conception, in the biblical tradition of God the Creator and Redeemer," he writes.
"Is what we profess in the Creed (a Christian prayer that includes belief in the virgin birth) true? he asks. He answers: "The answer is an unequivocal yes".
Catholics should see belief in the virgin birth and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead as "cornerstones of faith" because they are undeniable signs of God's creative power.
"If God does not also have power over matter, then he simply is not God," Benedict writes. "But he does have this power, and through the conception and resurrection of Jesus Christ he has ushered in a new creation."
In other sections of the book Benedict discusses the genealogy of Jesus, the figure of St Joseph, the story of the wise men who the Bible says paid tribute to the infant Jesus in the manger in Bethlehem.
In his two previous volumes on the life of Jesus, Benedict condemned violence committed in God's name and personally exonerated Jews of responsibility for the death of Jesus.
10 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Victor Pulis
Nov 24th 2012, 22:28
Greek mythology is replete with heroes who were fathered by gods and mortal women. Jerusalem in the time of Christ was more greek than Jewish. Hellenism had made inroads into the culture of Israel. The jewish messiah was never envisaged as a god but a mere human who was to lead the jews out of slavery from their oppressors.
T Crosthwaite
Nov 28th 2012, 08:58
The virgin birth story falls over at the start if it doesn’t appear in the NT. And it doesn’t. What it does say is that Joseph was not Jesus’ father and why. It also names the father of Jesus.
The few passages about the birth of Jesus in the NT are analysed comprehensively on — http://www.wallsofjericho.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=26
Victor Pulis
Nov 24th 2012, 19:43
The Egyptian Queen Hatshepsut is supposed to have been born of a union between Amen Ra and pharaoh's wife Ahmose. And guess how The god toth who was accompanying Ra greeted Ahmose. Hail to thee blessed of women for you shall concieve and bear a child which will become great. Sounds familiar?
Victor Pulis
Nov 24th 2012, 17:29
The book has nothing to stand on but what is written in the gospels. All other information is just pure conjecture or tradition. The Pope is only to be expected to defend his beliefs. There are a multitude of stories about virgin births from as far back as the ancient egyptians.
Victor Rodenas
Nov 20th 2012, 19:54
Many,many years ago it was a custome to say that when an important person was born,..a star was seen and that it was a virgin birth.Intercource between married couples was seen as a venial sin,because it had pleasure in it,so not to say that Mary comitted a venial sin it was said that it was a vergin birth.St. Augustin wrote about these things and the Church still follows his teachings.
CHARLES MUSCAT
Nov 20th 2012, 23:40
Please be so kind to inform us how many years you have studied and searched this subject matter and what publications you have authored so that we can compare them to those of Ratzinger; only then shall we start giving any validity to your comments which as yet we can only term as term 'prejudices'.
Victor Rodenas
Nov 21st 2012, 09:03
Sur C Muscat reading St. Augustine works,City of God etc,and checking the Internet and years of Theology study ...will lead back to square one because the virgin birth (Immaculate conception)...is a dogma and I do not know or understand Dogmas,......do you?
Paul Pulis
Nov 20th 2012, 17:26
The book is just a theological exercise. It does not address a number of historical inaccuracies related to the theme. These include, Christ's birth, his genealogy, the wise men, the murder of the innocents, who was Joseph, Mary's family/ social status. It also does not deal with the historical atmosphere prevailing when these facts/dogmas were established. Space does not permit expansion. Research
Alfred Gatt
Nov 20th 2012, 21:40
This book is not just a theological exercise. It is just affirming what we Catholics have always believed and is being continuously reaffirmed.
Victor Pulis
Nov 24th 2012, 17:30
Which means there's nothing new. Just an affirmation of belief.
Please choose the reason of your report below: