Government, Opposition, to hold talks on IVF law
Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi indicated this evening that the government would remove a requirement in the IVF Bill which provided that prospective parents would need the go-ahead by the Regulatory Authority to have IVF treatment.
The proviso had been criticised by the Opposition and independent MP Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando.
Speaking in Parliament, Dr Gonzi said both sides of the House agreed on the need to have a Regulatory Authority. The important thing, he said, was that the Authority would have the means to monitor, investigate and take whatever action was needed to ensure that standards were maintained.
He noted that there was also some disagreement on whether there should be a limit on the number of embryos that should be implanted and whether such a limit should be in the law.
The advice which the government was constantly given was that the limit should be laid down in the law.
The Bill laid down a limit of two embryos , with exceptions for particular cases, and this was the direction towards which other countries were also heading.
He said that the government had handed the Opposition proposed amendments to the Bill and was awaiting the Opposition's proposals with a view for consensus to be reached within the next 24 hours.
He was therefore proposing that the debate should be put off tomorrow so that talks could be held, as required, for total consensus to be reached on this Bill.
Earlier, Dr Gonzi said the Maltese were proud of their values, of which the best was respect for human life, about which there was total agreement between both parties.
There was therefore agreement in Parliament that embryos should be protected.
There was no doubt that assisted procreation needed to be regulated. It should not be stifled, because there was nothing better than the miracle of life. But there needed to be regulation to prevent abuse.
Happily, technology had advanced such that the freezing of embryos was now no longer needed since once could use vitrification.
Dr Gonzi noted that the Bill banned experimentation and abusive use of fertilised eggs. Embryos may not be removed from one woman to be implanted in another.
Surrogate motherhood and the mixing of human and animal cells were also being prohibited. Nor could embryos be destroyed because this amounted to killing.
Dr Gonzi noted that all these could be done in Malta so far, hence the need for regulation.
8 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Joseph Mizzi
Nov 20th 2012, 08:52
I believe that there is essential agreement in parliament on the limit of two embryo transfer per cycle as a general rule, and stipulated in the law, and with exceptions as per protocol to be issued by the regulatory authority.
Charles J. Buttigieg
Nov 20th 2012, 08:30
The PM’s declaration that the government would remove a requirement in the IVF Bill which provided that prospective parents would need the go-ahead by the Regulatory Authority to have IVF treatment came about to appease JPO and for no other reason.
The proviso had been criticised by the Opposition and JPO .and the opposition was about to move an amendment which JPO would have supported .
Alex Falzon
Nov 20th 2012, 07:31
Both parties are playing with values ... and people's emotions ... this law should never been mentioned moreover introduced.
Ramon Casha
Nov 20th 2012, 05:49
"Earlier, Dr Gonzi said the Maltese were proud of their values"
Of course they are, but their values are clearly not the same as yours - as evidenced by the divorce referendum as well as the original text for this bill, the cohabitation bill etc
mark borg
Nov 19th 2012, 20:20
tghid mhux se nafdawk dr Gonzi...umbghad trirbah l-elezzjoni u idawwar kollox min gimgha wara, biex tghogob lil knisja .la iproponejta hekk mil ewwel sinjal li hekk temmen !
Anthony Paul Naudi
Nov 20th 2012, 04:34
Kulhadd jimxi skond it-twemmin tieghu. Kulhadd ghandu d-dritt li joggezzjona imma kulhadd ghandu jkun tolleranti lejn hadd iehor.
A.P.Naudi
Kenneth Grima
Nov 19th 2012, 20:15
Why a surrogate mother no?Imagine a mother with an infertile daughter and the mother offers to the daughter to carry the grandchild herself why not?
James De Giorgio
Nov 19th 2012, 21:50
because not kenneth. immagina t-tahwid tat-tifla jew tifel li titwieled taht dac-cirkustanzi. kollox bil-why not.
Please choose the reason of your report below: