Advert

President clarifies that he had prerogative on granting pardon

President George Abela clarified this morning that it had been his prerogative whether or not to grant a pardon to a woman who was jailed for refusing her husband access to their son.

Speaking in a radio interview on the PBS programme Ghandi xi Nghid, Dr Abela said the President did not simply act on the advice given to him (by the government) as some journalists had written, but he could exercise his own prerogative.

In this case, he said, he had given importance to the views of the couple's son, whom he had met, the Cabinet, Attorney General and the Police, among others.

He also pointed out that this had been a partial pardon in that the woman had already served some 20 days in prison.

He also said that he has another pending request for another pardon to the same woman over another case related to access. He, therefore, could not comment further.

WHAT THE CONSTITUTION SAYS

The following is what the Constitution of Malta says: 

93. (1) The President shall have power to -
(a) grant to any person concerned in or convicted of any offence a pardon, either free or subject to lawful conditions;

(b) grant to any person a respite, either indefinite or for a specified period, of the execution of any sentence passed on that person for any offence;

(c) substitute a less severe form of punishment for any punishment imposed on any person for any offence; or

(d) remit the whole or part of any sentence passed on any person for an offence or for any penalty or forfeiture otherwise due to the State on account of any offence.

(2) (a) Where any person has been sentenced to death by any court in Malta, the President shall cause a written report of the case from the trial judge, or, in the case of a court-martial the person presiding, and such other information derived from the record of the case or elsewhere as the President may require, to be sent to the Minister responsible for justice.

(b) The said Minister shall send such written report and information (if any) to the Cabinet, and the Cabinet shall advise the President whether he should grant the offender a pardon or respite in the exercise of the powers conferred on him by this article.

(As downloaded from the website of the Office of the President)

Advert

62 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

m. borg (slm)

Nov 17th 2012, 22:25

What the heck are you talking about, you sound like a bumbling fool with dementia.

What has divorce got to do with presidential pardons

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 17th 2012, 23:15

You obviously have no idea of what divorce legislation is all about.

C. Vella

Nov 17th 2012, 18:45

no thanks

Alfred Falzon

Nov 17th 2012, 18:52

The day will come when truth and justice will prevail. We will all be in abetter position to judge whether H.E. George Abela was the best president and whether he deserves another term. At the moment I beg to differ.

John Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 20:52

We always say that x or y are the best. Best is to serve their term max 2 and move on. Life is like that. It's enough that we have a dictator in Government.....we do not want this extended to the presidency....let s move on.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 17th 2012, 23:16

Aflred, forget it!

Mr C Galea

Nov 17th 2012, 23:46

It seems that the people of malta never learn, good or no good two terrms max and then one should go. i love the american sytem of two terms only, this brings in new blood new ideas and less corruption.

Joseph Camilleri

Nov 18th 2012, 01:01

really.. no thank you!!

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 18th 2012, 04:13

In describing this president as the best president, you are insulting previous Presidents including Sir Anthony Mamo. However I am used to conservatives inflating their own egos and that of other conservatives.

Alfred Falzon

Nov 17th 2012, 21:22

Our highest institution has been reduced into a philanthropic institution.

Michael Magri

Nov 18th 2012, 10:01

Not exactly Alfred. The organization, `Community Chest Fund`, of which i think you are refering to, has been founded years ago and always under the patronship of the President. The point is that President Abela, has been the most President that has so far introduced various initiatives successfuly in all aspects to help those in need and i see nothing wrong with that at all.

Stefan Sacco

Nov 17th 2012, 21:01

Mr Schembri...the court most surely have heard all the story.....and did justice. Then came the Xarabank pressure....and then the President's pardon. Who should have left the course of justice doing its job ???

Martin Saliba

Nov 17th 2012, 17:24

My thoughts exactly . As far as i am concerned i will remember him for this pardon which should not have been given . Did he know that this woman had another case involving the same reasons ?

Andrew Terry Buttigieg

Nov 17th 2012, 18:10

I admire the president for his non-partisan approach, and during the Presidential charity Run for Strina I ran with him... for those acts I commend him, What I don't commend him is opening a prejudice... simply pardoning a Mother for blatantly avoiding the law, while legitimate cases such as http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20121111/local/Waiting-to-be-jailed.444806 are in picture. Unfair

david debattista

Nov 18th 2012, 00:12

Why, because you feel your self esteem as a man threatened ! GROW UP !
What about her son . Who can force a 16 year old nowadays , to see one of the parents , most will be out the front door so fast it will make your head spin . Give me a break Stefan, Martin .
Such problems must be approached in a holistic way especially by our courts !

G Schembri

Nov 17th 2012, 17:31

This marriage has ended way before the divorce law, as a matter of fact nowhere have we read that the couple is divorced.

B Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 17:46

@CF Campell
Who said divorce would magically solve all issues? I'd rather say the co-habitating blessing will do this.Get a life and admit that nowadays persons with marraige problems are not bound to wait 4 years to get a divorce.

m. borg (slm)

Nov 17th 2012, 22:26

Are you guys for real, what has divorce have to do with presidential pardons.

Geeeeeeeeze is everybody going crazy?

Tony Zammit

Nov 18th 2012, 05:26

CF Campbell
We joined the EU, so now we do what the rest of the EU countries do..Don’t blame me I didn’t vote to join, but maybe your fault mate.

G Schembri

Nov 17th 2012, 17:29

What if the mother has been victim of the justice system many times. The way the husband spoke shows clearly that he knows the laws and can find as many loopholes as he wants. The son must have had a good reason for refusing to see the father. It was only the father who said the son wanted to see him, but at the end the son said he now has come of age, and decided no to see his father.

Mr Anton Portelli

Nov 17th 2012, 18:31

I fully agree.
Your excellency you have shown that you are close to the people. Keep up your good work.

Alfred Falzon

Nov 17th 2012, 14:54

That is your opinion which I fully respect. Likewise I differ completely from your views regarding this presidency. There is more to it than meets the eye.

B Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 15:08

What's your point exactly?

Joseph Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 19:43

Nahseb li kieku inghazel bhala Pl leader kont se tfahhru!

B Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 15:12

@ Anthony Arpa
Jigifieri int tippreferi li dawn l-ex koppja jibqghu ghaddejjin bit-trouble bejniethom. Tinsiex li binhom illum huwa adult u jekk irid jara l-missieru l-ebda hadd m'hu se jzommu.Mill-banda l-ohra jekk ma jridx jaf bih ma jisgtgha jindahallu hadd l-anqas.

twanny borg

Nov 17th 2012, 15:30

u d-drittijiet tat-tifel/adult fejnhom?

twanny borg

Nov 17th 2012, 15:39

l-ewwel drittijiet ghandhom jigu ghal dan it-tifel/adult u mhux jigi ikkonsidrat bhala oggett. zgur li omm dan it-tifel jintbaghat il-habs mhux gustizzja darba dan mhux baby. jidher li l-qrati ma min iridu jaghtu sentenzi sospizi forsi ma xi halliel li jkun xeba jisraq.

Anthony Arpa

Nov 17th 2012, 17:31

Sur B Attard
Il kaz li qed jissemma huwa ta qabel u mhux ta issa u saru qabel it tifel ghalaq it 18, jibqa il fatt li il missier gie imcahhad mill jara lil ibnu ..

Alfred Falzon

Nov 17th 2012, 14:51

Why meet with the father when the lawyer defending the father is non other than the President's son. I am sure that His Excellency was well briefed.

Lawrence Zammit

Nov 17th 2012, 16:30

One of the most serious problems on this island is that no one respects anyone else. Mr. Vella, you are not the president and therefore your opinion in this case counts zero. When you do become president, maybe you will do better then President George Abela,but until that time show some respect!

G Schembri

Nov 17th 2012, 17:25

Do you know these persons personally? Do you know their whole story? I'm sure you don't. I'm sure the president is wise enough to realise that the wife was the victim and not the husband.

C. Vella

Nov 17th 2012, 18:44

Mr Zammit you preach respect but it seems you lack respect towards other’s opinions. Me like many out there did not like the way the pardon was handled and just like you, we have the right to give our two cents about what I consider the only black smudge in an otherwise perfect presidential run. I hope I did not shake your elitist pulpit too much.

Malcolm Mizzi

Nov 17th 2012, 13:16

That's the so called gender equality after all..

G Schembri

Nov 17th 2012, 13:19

Was there any a father who couldn't afford to pay maintenance set at a higher rate than his income, who asked for a presidential pardon and was refused? Why should this woman be sent to prison when her 17 year old son did not want to visit his father, what do you expect her to do, take him to his father by force?

Edward Camilleri

Nov 17th 2012, 13:40

As far as I know this father has not applied for a pardon, at least nothing in the newspapers. Therefore the president cannot consider this.

I thing the wrongdoing on this father is by the court, since he has found another job, he should have been given time to pay back. Its not like he doesn't want to work not to pay maintenance.Prison time does not help in such cases, but makes matters worse.

J Tabone

Nov 17th 2012, 14:33

I agree with Mr. Camilleri on this. What kind of justice is this? How can a person pay if he is earning less than the amount set by the judge? Shouldn't there be a percentage - say 45% - of a person's wage to be set as alimony/maintenance?

B Attard

Nov 17th 2012, 15:24

The president is a real gentleman, but unfortunately the set of rules dominating the Family court are rubbish.
A lot of people both men and women live the trauma daily in these courts of 'IN' justice.
I would like Mr. President to have a close look at what is going on in the family. Wasting 100's of euro on lawyers and court personnel could be better invested on the children's requirements.

Louis Muscat

Nov 17th 2012, 18:10

no pardon for a father who couldn't afford to pay maintenance set at a higher rate than his income" The problem with our courts is that it seems they just pass the sentence without ever study the case which leaves you with a lot of question marks. They tell you that you can appeal, easier said than done, when taking into consideration the exorbitant fees, one have to pay his/her lawyer.

Dr. David Pollina

Nov 17th 2012, 18:31

@G.Schembri, yes, and with the assistance of the police if needed! How many people wish to forget that it is each parents responsibility to see that the child (until 18) complies with a Court ORDER. It matters not what the child's opinion is to the order, it HAS to be obeyed.

At the same time, the Courts need to LISTEN to the children in such cases in addition to the parents.

Jesmond Degabriele

Nov 17th 2012, 17:13

U Il-missier x`jaghmel , imur mar-riha ta Wied Ghammieq?.

Advert
Advert