Advert

Rooftop tanks are supplying free water

Conference told that 56,000 new meters have been installed so far

Water tanks are costing the Water Services Corporation a lot of money.

Water tanks are costing the Water Services Corporation a lot of money.

Non-registration of water pumped into rooftop tanks is expected to be more than halved after all the water meters are changed, a conference heard yesterday.

No less than 18 per cent of water in rooftop tanks is currently undetected and therefore uncharged.

The figure is expected to be brought down to seven per cent, Ronald Pace from the Water Services Corporation told a conference on the subject.

The small trickles of water into the tank when it is filling up go undetected by the water meter, with the corporation dismissing it as “unavoidable”.

The conference was organised as part of the corporation’s 20th anniversary and brought together local and foreign experts to discuss non-revenue water – water produced or fed by the corporation into the system but which is not paid for by the consumer.

Mr Pace, who is responsible for dealing with such leakages as well as the roll-out of the Automated Metering Management project, said 56,000 meters have been installed so far – more than 50 per cent of the total.

All meters installed before 2003 will be changed, bringing down the average age of the meters from 9.2 years to around six years.

He said the new meters will go a long way towards reducing the amount of undetected water although even brand new meters were failing to detect such low flows.

Asked whether this could ever be solved, Stephen Galea St John, responsible for leakage management, said rooftop tanks, although unnecessary because the level of service has improved considerably, seem to be there to stay.

“There are other methods of decreasing the water losses by installing a device inside the actual tank but this has to be done at the mercy of customers so we are not seeing it as a possible solution,” he said.

Mr Galea St John said the demand of 160,000 cubic metres of water per day in the 1990s had halved, despite an increase in population.

The corporation supplies water through 90 boreholes in Malta and 30 in Gozo, 10 pumping stations in Malta and two in Gozo and three reverse osmosis plants which are not run at their full capacity. A total of 45 per cent of the water is supplied through boreholes with the rest supplied by reverse osmosis plants.

The new meters will result in more frequent and accurate billing and a substantial decrease in water which is not billed.

Factors of ‘no revenue water’ include theft, although this was limited, and meter reading and billing mistakes.

The new meters transmit data remotely every four hours, enabling the corporation to detect a problem when variations between consumption and supply varied considerably.

Advert

68 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Ronald Borg

Nov 17th 2012, 20:07

And? From what I gather, the damage was verified and marked out to be excavated. Do you expect to see workers immediately on the spot? I hope the water services do not employ so many excess workers that each and every complaint is seen to in 10 minutes!!! Has it ever occured to you that there may be other emergencies? Of course not. you are just an armchair critic!

Charles Spiteri

Nov 17th 2012, 20:51

Truly so. I have reported leaks on weekends and no one from the Water Services Corporation seemed to take any notice, apart taking the report and the water left leaking for day after another.

Giov DeMartino

Nov 18th 2012, 11:14

Yes, of course, Mr Borg is right! Leaving thousands of liters of water going down the drain for more than a week is acceptable! Very often there is no need to put any marks because large quantities of water seeping out from the tarmac can be easily seen. No one mentioned the 10 minutes, Mr Borg, but waiting for ten days to fix the leak is quite normal.

Pippo de Marco

Nov 17th 2012, 19:17

I think there's more chance of you getting a second or even third water tank, Robert :-)

B. Farrugia

Nov 17th 2012, 16:50

Don`t worry they are just recharging the water table.

vincent Lia

Nov 17th 2012, 21:27

No no refunds but Mariella you should use the 'the high pressure air coming through the pipes' to pump your car tyres. There are many other gadgets that can be driven off this air and you can save on electricity. Good luck.

Ray Buhagiar

Nov 17th 2012, 13:18

People are washing less cars, and even housewives do not wash floors, windows on a daily basis as they used to in the 90s. People are learning fast how to preserve water. Pity the WSC hasn't learned much except installing new meters.

Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)

Nov 17th 2012, 14:20

I suppose the water corporation can always start charging the bottlers for what they take but these will increase the price of your bottled water to cover their cost. Six of one and half-a-dozen of the other to them,Mr Scerri.

But consumers will end up paying the charge and a percentage of profit for the bottlers as well.

J Martinelli

Nov 17th 2012, 13:51

Mr Grech, if the present govt. is 'sleeping' regarding the water issue, was the government in a coma or in a vegetative state when not even a trickle flowed from our kitchen taps? When bowsers supplied water when and if at all? When the famous solution to no water at shower-heads or toilet was to tell people to bathe at sea and use sea water to flush toilets?
You're worried about 'free water'?

Pavlaki Pano Aroditis

Nov 17th 2012, 14:05

Yes, Mr Grech. Mr Martinelli is absolutely right. What about the time some 200 years ago when Malta didn't have piped water? And what about when people only washed once a week with well-water? How dare you complain that millions of gallons are stolen pumped illegally under the noses of an incompetent administration? Please shut up and suffer in silence.

Dennis Agius

Nov 17th 2012, 13:39

ha ha ha..... good one.

Alfred Vassallo

Nov 17th 2012, 17:38

That's the spirit Don Giovanni. That's why labour always count on you!

Giov DeMartino

Nov 17th 2012, 18:25

U jaghmlu sewwa Fred!

Alfred Vassallo

Nov 17th 2012, 19:03

@Giov DeMartino

Bully int!

Alfred Vassallo

Nov 17th 2012, 11:54

Niiiiice.

Ronald Borg

Nov 17th 2012, 12:41

Really?
If your recommendations are as interesting as your comments below, forget it.
"Generous consultancy fee" my foot

George Joseph Cauchi

Nov 17th 2012, 13:11

The trickle effect of water thanks is the problem of WSC since pressure in the pipelines supplied by WSC is too low. In some areas roof thanks only get filled up during the night. I hope the Government won't waste more of our taxes on more consultancy fees.

Reuben D. Spiteri

Nov 17th 2012, 13:45

Mr Borg I 'think' he was being sarcastic.

D. A . Agius

Nov 17th 2012, 16:53

Just report it as being faulty.

Luigi Cassar Manghi

Nov 17th 2012, 11:12

V. Cauchi: even if today's probability of interrupted mains water supply is reduced to 1/100,000 the effect of that one single event can be disastrous (for all ages). Suggesting removing water tanks is an ABOMINATION.

V. Cauchi

Nov 17th 2012, 12:11

@ LC Manghi
Sorry I am not suggesting removing tanks but simply recording history in the 70/80s. We need new ideas in this little island (and that for free) rather than the hurling of capitalized misinterpreted catchwords.

ANTHONY PAVIA

Nov 17th 2012, 16:51

But Government and its departments would rather gauge us against Greece, Italy and Ireland. How about some comparisons with successful nations, especially our size?

paul camilleri

Nov 17th 2012, 10:55

What are you on about??? who suggested to you that anyone one is going to remove water tanks from roofs? you need to read what is written and not let your imagination run away with you.

Luigi Cassar Manghi

Nov 17th 2012, 11:21

P.Camilleri: read article
"Stephen Galea St John, responsible for leakage management, said rooftop tanks, although unnecessary because the level of service has improved considerably, seem to be there to stay."
By inference he would like to remove them, if he could, because they are "unnecessary".

Reuben D. Spiteri

Nov 17th 2012, 13:42

"unnecessary"? I think NOT!

This is akin to saying that, just because roads have improved we should do away with spare tyres in our cars. Very, very clever I say...

Marco Cremona

Nov 17th 2012, 18:00

Charles, how did you get the impression that WSC wants to charge for rainwater?

Yes, WSC has a 'dislike' towards households collecting rainwater because this practice results in a loss of revenue for WSC - but the water regulator (and ultimate decision taker) is the Malta Resources Authority, which is in favour of rainwater harvesting, because it's way more sustainable than WSC water.

Joseph E Briffa

Nov 17th 2012, 10:34

j brincat....what a stupid comment. The government doesn't come into these things,WSC is trying to increase revenue and lower the vol of unmetered water, and you come with this qalbu perzuta thing.. Incredible, So you would like to tell us Labour is against this move and favours the existing situation? And the obsession of having a govt with a long arm. Labour never change.

Luigi Cassar Manghi

Nov 17th 2012, 11:07

J. Briffa: households should charge the cost and maintenance of roof top water thanks to WSC, because it is the only sure buffer supply. Don't say that mains supply is infallible.

Marco Cremona

Nov 17th 2012, 17:53

Yes, this free-water-as-a-result-of-the-roof-tank is effectively a free water-allocation bonus, which is OK because all households use a roof tank,so it is a 'subsidy' which benefits the rich and poor in absolute terms, but of course benefits the poorer households more in relative terms.

Marco Cremona

Nov 17th 2012, 16:56

William, people are NOT using less water. 1) They are getting their water from other sources i.e. private boreholes and bowsers and 2) WSC has less leaks than it had 15 years ago, so they have reduced their production.

So one has to ask:
1)Why doesn't WSC apply pressure to stop private extraction by boreholes and 2) why didn't we tackle leaks before we invested so heavily in RO production?

Eugene Sapiano

Nov 17th 2012, 10:25

As far as I know the absolute majority use tap water except for a few who use rain water; is the latter going to be measured as well?

Marco Cremona

Nov 17th 2012, 16:43

Yes, WSC just gave the game away. Very clever of them!

Advert
Advert