Advert

ARMS Ltd faces class action suit

EU citizens’ anger over paying more for utilities

The lawsuit alleges that ARMS is discriminating against non-Maltese.

The lawsuit alleges that ARMS is discriminating against non-Maltese.

Utilities billing company ARMS Ltd is some 10 days away from facing a class action lawsuit on behalf of a group of furious EU citizens living in Malta.

Several landlords don’t pay any tax on their rental properties and don’t want their cover blown

About 80 citizens have added their names to the lawsuit so far, alleging that ARMS is discriminating against non-Maltese by making it inordinately difficult for them to benefit from residential tariff rates.

The ARMS Class Action Group will continue to accept additional claimants until November 22. The legal process will then begin in earnest.

According to ACAG spokeswoman Patricia Graham, many people are holding back from joining the lawsuit for fear of angering their tax-evading landlords.

“Several landlords don’t pay any tax on their rental properties and don’t want their cover blown. And if people are happy with the property, they don’t want to upset their landlords,” Ms Graham said.

Tenants can be listed on utility bills as registered consumers but doing so exposes property owners to the taxman. Instead, Ms Graham said, many landlords kept utility bills in their own name and charged tenants directly.

“Most have no idea of how the system works when they first move to Malta and so just go along with it. It doesn’t help that estate agents seem entirely clueless about the system, either,” Ms Graham noted.

As a result, many such EU citizens receive utility bills charged at the so-called “domestic rate”, paying about 30 per cent more than those on the cheaper “residential” tariff.

To benefit from standard residential tariff rates, non-Maltese EU citizens must prove they are Maltese residents. But although such citizens must declare they reside here when applying for a local ID card, ARMS does not recognise this and insists on further proof.

Customers must put together multiple documents, from payslips to social security numbers, marriage certificates to proof of address, and present them to the Department for Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs in Valletta. In turn, the department issues them a registration certificate which clients then give to ARMS as proof of residency.

We know we have a case. I’m no lawyer, I’m just an ordinary woman. But someone has to speak up, because the way things are right now just isn’t right.

ACAG members say this is discriminatory because Maltese nationals only have to hand in their ID card to prove they are residents when applying.

An ARMS spokesman said that it usually took the company one week to process such applications. If the customer changed address, they did not need to resubmit residency documentation, the spokesman added.

But claims run directly counter to the experience of a number of such customers that The Times spoke to. One said that ARMS had taken “months” to process their application and that the bill they received while waiting was charged at the higher rate. Another simply laughed bitterly and asked: “Which week is ARMS talking about?”

ACAG spokesman David Reiling was similarly dismissive. “That’s absolute rubbish.

It took 81 e-mails and one month before ARMS confirmed my application,” he said, adding that each time he had re-applied following a house move, ARMS had insisted on him resubmitting all the necessary paperwork.

Ms Graham, who is a registered foster parent and regularly cares for Maltese children, said that ARMS did not even allow her to register the children as dependents and receive the concomitant bill reduction.

She threw her hands up in despair. “It seems I’m good enough to foster Maltese children but not good enough to get ARMS’ recognition of it. What nerve!”

The Government position is that ID cards given to EU citizens living here – and marked A for Alien – only prove temporary residency. Such ID cards will be phased out once newer cards are introduced. Until that happens, EU citizens living in Malta must dance to the bureaucratic tune or else receive bills charged at the higher tariffs, something ACAG members deem to be blatantly unjust but which ARMS says is simply in line with existing regulations.

ACAG members have written letters to the European Commission, MEPS and every Maltese MP asking them to petition on their behalf. The European Commission has already flagged the issue with the Government, sending it a letter of formal notice concerning the matter last September.

Ms Graham said that they had received “full support” from Alternattiva Demokratika, letters of support from some Labour MPs but no reply from any Nationalist MP.

“We know we have a case. I’m no lawyer, I’m just an ordinary woman. But someone has to speak up, because the way things are right now just isn’t right.”

bborg@timesofmalta.com

Advert

84 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

David Willow

Nov 17th 2012, 09:22

email armsclassaction@gmail.com

or eucad.malta@gmail.com

or look for their facebook pages "Class Action Against Arms Ltd

Joseph Vassallo, (Bugibba)

Nov 16th 2012, 13:45

You are quite right madam, they don't deduct it from the ensueing actual readings... they hold it on credit and reflect it in future bills. It is a way of suureptitiously taking an interest-free loan from the consumer. 20 units @ €5 is €100 so they are holding €1m for every 10k consumers they do it to. Likely to remain charged at €5 too.

Julia Partridge

Nov 16th 2012, 00:37

Incredible .....using market forces to the best DISadvantage. Why am I surprised.

David Willow

Nov 16th 2012, 06:58

it is indeed interesting to note that the census completed last year there was a question about renting and how much a renter paid but no questions about the owner or landlord.

A A Camilleri

Nov 16th 2012, 08:49

census forms are supposed to be confidential as far as i know.

David Willow

Nov 16th 2012, 10:50

I agree yes they are so why was it required to hand it back to the person who delivered it without an envelope - everyone of those collectors could have read the contents - and all of them were likely to be someone we dont know. CONFIDENTIAL i dont think so

Francis Raeymaekers

Nov 15th 2012, 13:10

Let's hook up to the Italian grid and be allowed to chose our energy supplier!

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 15:11

i like the idea of competition rather than monopoly... and i also like the idea of a grid connection and we can all say bye bye to ARMs - could anyone else be worse?

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 13:05

well done charles v schembri.....

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 12:55

ray - arms class action have as many maltese residents who have joined as a result of the landlord situation..its not just non maltese eu citizens

David Willow

Nov 17th 2012, 09:26

@ray woods - does the property company in your post advise clients of the billing requirements of and by private landlords or in the case of purchasers the requirements to get RESIDENTIAL RATES as opposed to DOMESTIC RATES....actually that applies to the landlord question too

Michael Asquith

Nov 15th 2012, 13:43

Eman, you are not quite correct, I have had emails answered, to be told my complaint and email was 'sent to the department concerned'. After numerous further emails and 18 months waiting I realised that my original email had infact been sent to the 'department who are not concerned in the slightest'. Like many I guess I just gave up in the end, not worth the hassle and time.

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 15:15

it took me 81 emails over 5 weeks and heaven knows how many copies of id cards res certs payslips SSC number just to change consumer numbers - despite being a registered consumer for the previous three years with a different landlord,- The key here is to be either registered consumers on the account holders bill or have the account in your name (466euros) - NOT EASY and all of arms doing.

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 11:23

exactly - and government approved.

David Willow

Nov 16th 2012, 07:08

no probably not - even Gonzi himself said he couldnt use any information gleaned from applications to ARMs as a witch hunt for potentially tax evading landlords -as " that would be hurting the very people we are trying to help"

Jonathan Barnes

Nov 15th 2012, 11:11

Please read the story, it is to do with the tarrif and not the number of occupants, although this does apply. As "residents" we should be paying residential, NOT domestic. Then the occupancy is taken into account.
arms, the Department for Citizenship and Expatriate Affairs, and the mep's have all allowed this situation to continue, they should all face legal proceedings.

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 11:25

at John Attard we are EU citizens as well and we live here permanently just like you (eu citizens) do and we can prove we reside here - and are ALLWAYS asked repeatedly to do so is that fair - I DONT THINK SO

Mr Tony Gatt

Nov 15th 2012, 10:39

The Americans do it. Enough said!

Pauline Thompson

Nov 15th 2012, 11:06

Mr Gatt so the Americans do it - that makes it right does it?

john Attard

Nov 15th 2012, 10:38

I think you failed yourself because if you knew he was using your meter for his services, then you should have taken action.

Jonathan Barnes

Nov 15th 2012, 11:26

Obviously i complained, but what else do i do, a large pair of snips and cut the cable???? By your comments you obviously agree to this illegal system, People please note, maybe this is one of the perpertrators mentioned in these comments.

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 11:27

john please get in touch with armsclassaction@gmail.com

or join them at https://www.facebook.com/groups/371466666251933/

George Joseph Cauchi

Nov 15th 2012, 10:23

You are absolutely right and we Maltese citizens do not see why you should be discriminated against unless there are some serious reason to the contrary.

Joe Spiteri

Nov 15th 2012, 10:42

They neither pay higher rates for electricity nor for using public transport!

Pauline Thompson

Nov 15th 2012, 11:25

Very true Julia - not only that, it's also with bus fares. Anyone using UK public transport pays the same fare & not a higher price like in Malta because they are not Maltese. Whether it is Arriva who implemented the higher charge or not. It boils down to the government to stop this discrimination, in particular, Malta so much relies on tourism!

Julia Partridge

Nov 15th 2012, 09:52

We tried that and were threatened with disconnection. We now pay 1000 euros each month to prevent this happening.

Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 10:21

That is all it is -a threat- and one which would remain unfulfilled especially if a lot of people are involved-trust me.By paying something you are not refusing to pay merely contesting the amount to be paid.

Mr Tony Gatt

Nov 15th 2012, 10:42

@ Julia Partridge

1000 euro? Are you running a business?

john Attard

Nov 15th 2012, 10:55

Mrs. Partridge,
That's a lot of power you're using. I don't spend that in a year with 5 dependents. A business with cold storage would have such an expense.

Franco Abela

Nov 15th 2012, 11:13

@ john Attard

you must have solar panels. If not I can't believe you spend less than 1000 in a year with 5 dependents! Unless they are babies.

We are 2 persons. Use energy savers/leds, gas heather and am very attentive on what I consume and bill is always around 900 euros a year!

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 12:09

at john attard-your not aware of the circumstances to make such a statement "that's a lot of power your using" plus you are assuming that its power used not estimated or a faulty meter plus the rates difference too. I know the circumstances - and you don't - believe me there are many situations like this one and its not as clear cut as you seem to think it is..plus there's the threat of disconnection

Julia Partridge

Nov 16th 2012, 01:21

@ John Attard - we are still awaiting the checking of the meter. An Independent test showed that it was not accurate and we were being shown as consuming electricity that could not be traced back to appliances. That remains unresolved. Also being on the higher rate to start with means that you very quickly get to the highest unit rate. Some of our bills were charged at 77cents per unit.

Mario Vella

Nov 15th 2012, 10:17

100 points Mr. Arapa ..... that is all about. Yesterday I went to the VAt Dept. every one paying 60 euros , 100 euros , and there was even a person with a ridiculous amount of 20 euros. Come on this is nonsense. Paying the return for these amount is much more worth it living on social benefits rather being a self employed. The government should start investigating ...........

Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 09:59

Answer Tessa is a resounding NO -nor do they pay more to travel on public transport.

Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 10:02

Not a logical deduction as then subsidies would automatically and unjustifiably have to be removed and the same would then apply to public transport -with an election looming would you take such an action ?Also the incoming government have made it part of their manifesto to reduce such tariffs

john Attard

Nov 15th 2012, 10:22

It is important to us Maltese who earn much less than our counterparts. I do not think voters consider these matters in the elections.

Alan Kay

Nov 15th 2012, 10:45

@ Mr Murray: hadn't realised the "incoming government" had been decided, although notice it is part of Muscat's agenda, for what that is worth.

It is naive to think ARMS would accept it has to apply a 30% reduction across the board to all on the domestic rate, should it lose this case.

I agree about ARRIVA, same principle. Be several elections before any resolution in any case.


Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 13:04

Care to have a bet about who will be the next ruling party Mr Kay?In any event ,your logic remains still flawed

Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 13:05

Care to have a bet about who will be the next ruling party Mr Kay?In any event ,your logic remains still flawed

K. Vella II

Nov 15th 2012, 11:55

Tony, in your case the Domestic rate on your flat is correct, as there are no tenants, declared or otherwise. The Domestic rate is an indirect tax on vacation houses and multiple properties (e.g. if you have a number of garages not directly attached to your primary residence).

David Willow

Nov 15th 2012, 12:12

so what about the Maltese resident in Uk or any other EU member state, and i bet they have a house here too - and i further l bet they kept their Maltese id card and pay the same rates as everyone else both here in malta and in the uk...a little unfair dont you think?

Mark Vella

Nov 15th 2012, 09:33

Sewwa....so now the rental rates will go up sharply. Plain and Simple. Plus if you can't afford it, well.... sleep on the road.

twanny borg

Nov 15th 2012, 09:48

@mark vella- it-taxxa trid tingabar u mhux tinzamm mis-sidien. jekk bl-istess argument imissu kulhadd f'kollox izomm it-taxxa ghalih. il-lum is-suq jaghmel il-prezz tal-kirja. is-sidien mhu se jgibu rispett lil hadd. ninsisti li s-sinjuri jridu jhallsu dak li huwa dovut jekk ma jridux ihallu l-postijiet battala jhallsu l-kontijiet ghal xejn.

Jason Scerri

Nov 15th 2012, 11:23

Mr Borg, i agree with you 100%. It's about time that the tax evasion issue is taken seriously. and I don't agree with Mr Vella that the rental rates will go up. There are so many vacant properties and a lot of competition.

Vincent Gauci

Nov 15th 2012, 09:27

Rather Naive! Politicians don't take unpopular decisions.

Peter Murray

Nov 15th 2012, 09:39

Vincent there are many "naive" politicians no longer in office because of such failures to take an "unpopular" position

Advert
Advert