Advert

IVF bill humiliating but can be salvaged - Muscat

The IVF bill is humiliating for parents, children and professionals, Labour leader Joseph Muscat said this evening.

Speaking in Parliament, during the debate on the bill for the protection of the embryo, Dr Muscat said the Opposition would be voting in favour of the second reading not because it agreed with the bill as presented but because it agreed on the need to regulate.

It also believed that the bill could be salvaged but it would be moving crucial amendments at committee stage, he said. He proposed the committee stage to be debated in plenary and it was willing to agree on a timetable that would wholly cover the debate by the end of next week.

The Opposition, Dr Muscat said, believed that it would be irresponsible if, after so many years of debate, the current vacuum was allowed to continue.

The law the House would enact would not be perfect and could present moral dilemmas for some.

Dr Muscat said he was willing to give the bill the benefit of the doubt because he believed it could be changed and improved.

Declaring himself as a liberal, he said this to him meant not to be afraid to be labelled.

“We have to show European courage in our country, live European values and ideas in Malta.”

He said that as someone who had served in the European Parliament, this was not the first time he had had to face dilemmas and questions.

To be in a group and in a part of Parliament where abortion was a right and stand up and say you did not agree was not easy but it showed that you were willing to work for what he believed in.

In the same way MPs had to have the courage to implement progressive ideas.

The law that would be enacted would be the result of a compromise. It would not be perfect and some would not like it. However, it was crucial so as not to continue to allow a vacuum.

Dr Muscat said that one of the concepts being introduced was that of embryo freezing and it was very important that the House was conscious of what it was trying to do.

For this fact destroyed the myth that IVF or embryo freezing was equivalent to abortion, about which there was consensus against in Parliament.

He promised that a new government would be committed to ensure that the public health service offered IVF free of charge to couples who needed it.

The Labour leader said the Opposition could not agree with the introduction of a planning authority for birth, as was being proposed.

For the bill was proposing, he said, that a couple had to apply for a permit to become parents. This was humiliating and intolerable, a vision of a big brother government the opposition could not agree with.

He said that while there could be abuse, parents opting for IVF were being seen as capricious, nearly criminal and having ulterior motives.

Those opting for IVF, he said, little thought about their baby would look and the kind of attitude presented by the bill was atrocious and similar to a theocracy edict. It was abominable.

The way the bill was written was putting those who wanted to use this technology under suspicion, labelling them guilty unless proven otherwise.

Dr Muscat said that the bill was restrictive and impractical and unless it was changed it would not change the current situation. It would also lead to more people being advised not to waste time in Malta but to go for the treatment abroad.

Certificates, he said, should not be issued by the proposed authority but by the professionals who would have consulted the couple.

This authority, he insisted, should be removed at committee stage because he did not have confidence in it and would end up being another unnecessary bureaucracy.

On the number of embryos to be implanted, he said that the fact that the number was increased from two to three within a week of the bill being launched, showed how half baked the bill was.

The bill, Dr Muscat said, was proposing a straight jacket and the opposition wanted to allow the professionals to treat case by case individually and decide accordingly.

The Labour leader noted that there could be a case where both parents died while the embryo was being fertilised. The bill should make clear what would be done in such instances and introduce concepts on the adoption of frozen embryos with the family court being the forum that would decide what should be done. There was agreement that the adoption procedure should not be against payment.

He said it was wrong that the bill threatened professionals with prison, the attitude, he said, should be different as there were other solutions which could be taken and medical professionals should not be treated as criminals.

The bill should also widen as much as possible the concept allowing professionals to decide not to take part in the process because of moral convictions without being penalised for their decision.

A grey area, he said, was on what would happen in the case of specialists referring couples abroad for an IVF process which could include concepts not included in local law.

It should be made clear that these professionals would not be criminally liable for giving such advice.

Advert

72 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:28

1) What will happen to abandoned fertilized embryos?
2) If X amount of embryos are fertilized; can the couple request that only Y amount of embryos are implanted? What will happen to the X-Y embryo?
3) What will be the process for embryo adoption. Will the couple be able to select embryos by checking from a book the qualities of such embryo (ex: father had blond hair)?

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:30

If you notice many who are against embryo freezing are not against a couple having children (indeed many of us encourage research in this line); but in favour of ALSO safeguarding the 3rd parties involved; i.e. - all life that is generated with the IVF process and to avoid playing gods (ex: selecting which embryo has a chance to continue in the walk of life and which not for one reason or another)

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 13:05

To be more clear. I am not against an IVF law. It is very important that in Malta we have a law on IVF. What I and many others are against is an IVF law that does not respect the fact that "life begins from conception".

Glen Rund

Nov 15th 2012, 13:10

Imagine a couple that has experienced multiple IVF failures. PGD determines that most of the embryos have chromosomal derangement, in short NO WAY will they develop into anything let alone healthy babies. In this way, YES, than PGD should as HAS TO be used to select the right embryo. This is NOT playing GOD, this is science. Incidentally even healthy embryos is NO GUARANTEE of a baby.

Amante Reale

Nov 15th 2012, 10:51

Liberal and Socialist are not mutually exclusive.

Learn some politics.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:40

@Amante Reale
Yes you are right, and Joseph Muscat is a clear example of that; when the tide goes one way he is a Socialist, and when the tide goes the other way; he becomes a Liberal!! Wonder what he will do when he gets to know that the PEOPLE want a real leader; rather then one that changes his line of thinking based on what is printed on the media!!

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 10:51

That is not true; Do not try to change the words of Tonio Borg; he said it is not illegal (since the action was not done on Maltese soil), but he never said they such practices are not immoral.

Kevin Cassar

Nov 15th 2012, 11:20

@ Joseph Aquilina

Immoral, apart from being subjective, does not equal illegal (although not so long ago it unbelievably was). Talk about changing words!

Patrick Zammit

Nov 15th 2012, 12:02

Joseph, will T Borg try to propose anti abortion legislation in the EU just like he tried to push anti abortion law into the Constitution?

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:21

@Kevin Cassar
Where did I say that immoral equals illegal?

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:43

@Patrick Zammit
Did you hear what Tonio Borg said during the interview; or you are talking without not even knowing what was said. Tonio Borg made it very clear that EU laws make it impossible for him to force any such thing on other countries because on that matter each country is sovereign.

Patrick Zammit

Nov 15th 2012, 13:57

Joseph, Commissioners have a right to propose laws and/or amendments to them. So my question is still valid.

C Bartolo

Nov 15th 2012, 08:37

Really? I see no indication that Joseph Muscat does not respect life from the time of conception. None at all.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 09:15

@John Spiteri
Depends, if you are Catholic then he is more Christian then the Pope himself else if you are a liberal he automatically becomes more liberal then those liberals in the EU! You know, there is a Joseph with a different version for everyone.

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:37

John Spiteri: Don't start bringing religion into the argument.After all, a law should not be addressed to Catholics but to all citizens living in Malta , who have various beliefs or no belief at all.

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:41

Joseph Aquilina: You should have addressed the words " There is a Joseph with a different version for everyone", to Dr. Tonio Borg, who admitted that he will be " a European commissioner " and not " a Maltese commissioner". And that his personal religious beliefs will be put aside when taking decisions as a commissioner !

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:19

@Eddy Privitera
Here is where you are wrong; Tonio Borg was talking about the legal aspect while here we have Joseph Muscat which first told us he is against abortion; and now (ghax hekk hi il moda) he is telling us he is a liberal!! Liberals are in favor of abortion!!

Mr F J Brincat

Nov 15th 2012, 08:21

"Someone not related to performing these procedures must be present to overlook the whole process ." Like who? A doctor or a lawer? A priest or a responsibile adult? A liberal or conservative?

Louis Cutajar

Nov 15th 2012, 07:49

Jekk niġu f'dan lanqas Joseph Muscat m'għandu idea tas-suġġett u allura wkoll m'għandux jitkellem. Meta wieħed jiffriża embrijun li huwa persuna diġa qed innaqqsu mir-rispett u d-dinjita lejn il-bniedem. U jekk dan jiġi aċċettat nispiċċaw b'eluf kbar ta' embrijuni żejda li ma jintużawx u jispiċċaw jiġu meqruda u dan huwa ekwivalenti għall-abort.

Brian Gatt

Nov 15th 2012, 09:29

@ Luis Cutajar and Joseph Fenech,

Who are you to judge? Who are you to criticise? Who gave you the power to decide the faith of others? Science has made quantum leaps and people like you are always in the forefront to block progress, using the excuse that you are doing it in the name of the Lord - You always have a hidden agenda and I think that keeping the people ignorant is one of them

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:44

Louis Cutajar: Joseph Muscat ghandu bizzejjed konsuleneti medici dwar dan is-suggett. Int liema konsulenti medici ikkonsultajt maghhom dwar dan is-sugget ?

Louis Cutajar

Nov 15th 2012, 10:50

Qatt ma nista dak li hu hażin ngħidlu tajjeb. Ix-xjenza hija tajba dment li tgħin il-bniedem, imma jekk tnaqqas id-dinjita tal-bniedem tkun qed tintuża ħażin. Li embrijun huwa bidu tal-ħajja huwa fatt ta' xjenza u mhux reliġjon u li għandu dritt għall-ħajja u rispett. Bniedem liberu ma jfissirx li jagħmel li jrid saħansitra jieħu l-liberta tal-oħrajn.

Louis Cutajar

Nov 15th 2012, 13:52

Sur Privitera, is-suġġett li bħalissa qed nistudja f'livell ta' Masters huwa Bioetika u naħseb li għandi formazzjoni vasta fuq is-suġġett.

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:47

Joseph Fenech: Possibbli ma tafx kemm hawn fid-dinja Kattolici LIBERALI ? M'ilux wisq miet il-Kardinal Martini li qal li l-Knisja Kattolika qieghda 200 sena lura !

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:47

@Eddy
Was il-Kardinal Martini in favor of abortion? I think NOT.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:49

@Joseph Brincat
Are you a Maltese or not? In Malta; according to the EU laws itself, we are SOVEREIGN to decide what to do on these issues!! If you are not proud to be Maltese then do not throw your "I am easily impressed by foreigners" on us who are proud of our heritage; of what we believe!!

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 15th 2012, 01:06

I am talking about the lack of logic and ability to think clearly. Fancy someone suggesting that there is no such thing as liberal socialism. It appears JCC never went past tan-nuna! As I often say, the little island of Malta is so blessed with so many professuri and bullies.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:53

Liberal = Pro Abortion
Joseph Muscat = Liberal
Therefore Joseph Muscat = Pro Abortion

Will Joseph Muscat once voted as PM opt to legalize abortion so he will look cool with his liberal friends in the EU? Since clearly from his speech he is more worried on what the EU thinks about us rather then WHAT WE THINK ABOUT OURSELVES!!

Jimmy Ventura

Nov 14th 2012, 22:43

Dear JCS

Its good to have your learned opinion on Dr. Tonio Borg's statement that he sees nothing wrong if a Maltese citizen goes to the UK to have an abortion.

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:57

Joseph cauchi Senior: There are a number of GonziPN MPs who have been projecting a LIBERAL stance, such as we have seen during the divorce debate and referendum !

L. Zammit

Nov 14th 2012, 21:53

Medical professionals in all sectors are trained to take the best decisions relating to the case in question, with the involvement of the client him/herself. I don't see why this should change in IVF's case.

Government doesn't decide who gets a heart transplant .. so why should it dictate who is eligible for IVF or not? Authority should stay out of the medical procedure itself.

Marija Falzon

Nov 14th 2012, 22:45

Dear Paul, I disagree with you completely. Professionals should be treated as so. If there is no trust in them, then don't let them function in the first place. It is unacceptable that a parent has to ask your permission to have children. Who will oversee the authority that it is doing a job properly, and not abusing its powers? are you suggesting that we create an endless hierarchy of checks

Lynn Zahra

Nov 14th 2012, 23:11

With an Authority in place we will be no different than China, where State Policy dictate one only child per couple a rule that is strictly enforced.

c p agius

Nov 15th 2012, 00:27

Does GOL support Dr. Adrian Vassallo?

R Vassallo

Nov 15th 2012, 08:55

...........and who watches the watchers??????

Eddy Privitera

Nov 15th 2012, 10:58

P. Vincenti: Imagine if YOU were to sit on such an authority !

PAUL SULTANA

Nov 15th 2012, 11:00

The Authority should not screen which patients need IVF and who does not. The Doctor should do this. The authority should be there to make sure that clinic abide by the law.

Marija Falzon

Nov 14th 2012, 22:51

The authority you propose is the ONLY reason why this law as being proposed is not good enough. The authority humiliates the parents who need to ask permission to have children. With your argument, every couple should ask for your permission before they go to bed every night.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 10:24

Clearly you want to hear what you want to hear. Tonio Borg NEVER said he was not against abortion as long as this was done in another country. Tonio Borg said that this was LEGAL and such people cannot be taken to COURT when coming back to Malta. On the other hand we have Joseph declaring himself LIBERAL; and liberals are in FAVOUR OF ABORTION!

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 10:25

Therefore, is it possible for Joseph Muscat to rather then try to make everyone happy by selling a different version of him to everyone ACTUALLY TELL US THE TRUTH ON WHAT HE CONSIDERS RIGHT OR WRONG!!!

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 14th 2012, 20:04

* Liberals in the EU not Malta.

Glen Rund

Nov 14th 2012, 21:09

I will not comment on Maltese politics but embryo freezing is definitely NOT abortion. I would strongly suggest to anybody commenting on IVF to seriously research the medical science on initially on normal natural conception, how it really works, odds of success etc. and then IVF with all the different permutations according to the reproductive challenges being faced by the woman, men or both.

Frans Aguis

Nov 14th 2012, 23:50

Embryo freezing is no abortion.It is embryo freezing.If you want to live in the stone ages go live in south america with the creationist and the evangelist Christians. Not everyone is against abortion like you.Personally I would love it if we start to at least talk about abortion and other women's health issue, most importantly what should be covered by the state and what should not.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 15th 2012, 01:01

Glen, I imagine we should start encouraging (some) Maltese (living in Malta) to stop having sex to make sure that no sperms are wasted. What appalling ignorance. All in the name of an imagined god.

Louis Cutajar

Nov 15th 2012, 07:55

Glen Rund informa ruħek, jekk għandek embrijun għandek ħajja u għandek persuna li għandha dinjita u għandha tiġi rispettata. L-iffriżar tal-embrijuni jfisser nuqqas ta' rispett u dinjita. U ħafna drabi dawn l-embrijuni żejda jispiċċaw meqruda jew jingħataw għar-riċerka li fl-aħħar jiġu meqruda wkoll, u din il-qerda tal-embrijuni hija ekwivalenti għall-abort.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 09:19

@Glen Rund
Maybe you should first of all go read those books yourself; an embryo (fertilized egg) is the beginning of life! Embryo freezing is suspended life which in many countries is dumped because there is nothing that can be done (i.e - the number of frozen embryos is by far larger then the number of embryos that can be adopted). Throwing away an embryo, or leave it there to die is abortion.

Glen Rund

Nov 15th 2012, 11:41

Gentlemen,
Talk to the Maltese specialists in this field, I'm sure they exist. Normal sex is normal, so I may have been misunderstood. In normal circumstances even when an egg is fertilized and progresses forward it doesn't necessarily implant and proceed to become a baby. Also many embryos have chromosomal abnormalities resulting in self-aborting. This is the way nature works.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 15th 2012, 12:56

@Glen Rund
We have no problem with the way nature works; we have a problem with having a doctor decides him/herself which embryo gets a chance for life and which not. Many will tell you that the current law (apart minor things regarding embryo freezing) is acceptable. The problem is that clearly lejber do not mind attacking the principle of "life from conception".

Advert
Advert