Advert

Adrian Vassallo brands liberals 'pigs' and slams IVF

Dr Adrian Vassallo.

Dr Adrian Vassallo.

Labour MP Adrian Vassallo this evening hit out at the IVF Bill and branded liberals as 'pigs,' saying he was doing so because he had been described as a conservative 'dinosaur'.

Speaking in Parliament, Dr Vassallo confirmed that he would vote against the Bill on second reading, but would vote in favour of amendments which the Opposition would move.

Dr Vassallo said that many people thought that IVF was about using the egg of a woman and the seed of a man, mixing them up, implanting the embryo and, hey presto, a baby was born nine months later.

Alas, matters were not so simple. Few would argue about the end result, but the issue was about the means.

The process involved the implantation of several embryos with the hope that one would develop. This was not a natural process and in many cases, life which started in the dish or the test tube died.

Now much was being said about a new process - vitrification (the freezing of the woman's egg). However a report by US experts said that a more cautious tone was needed.

Ovary freezing was not some miracle which was always successful. Experts said that "the rush into vitrification has probably been immature."

Yet Malta wanted to introduce something which was still experimental.

Dr Vassallo said an issue which needed to be considered was age. The Bill  did not establish the maximum age of a woman who sought IVF.

Furthermore, what would happen to frozen embryos if they could not be implanted, such as if the woman died? What say would the father have?

Could Malta have surrogate mothers?

UNMARRIED COUPLES

How was it that, through this legislation, Malta was to allow access to IVF for unmarried couples who were in a stable relationship? 

Once there was divorce, those who wanted children could marry, and if they could not have children they could seek IVF.  But to offer this process to unmarried couples when there was no obstacle to marriage did not make sense. Children born within marriage and a stable family had a stronger chance of a stable upbringing.

He feared, Dr Vassallo said, that such provisions in the Bill were an excuse for those who were gay to have children. He saw no other reason why unmarried couples could have a right to IVF.

The Labour MP insisted that this Bill did not protect embryos, despite what the government was saying. The way things were currently done in Malta showed that embryo freezing was already being done, when foreigners came to Malta for the purpose. One only needed to see how many twins were born on practically the same day.

Turning to risks, Dr Vassallo said that between 1990 and 2011 there were 196 births through IVF which were premature. Some were triplets, some were quads. 45 died. So where was respect for life? This was a haphazard operation.

Of the births, there was as a high percentage of children who suffered cerebral palsy, a high percentage who were born prematurely with lower IQ and a bigger risk of behavioural difficulties and ADHD. IVF babies had twice the normal chance of problems with language development.

A study in Japan showed that in twin pregnancies they had a 7.4% chance of cerebral palsy, impaired sight or congenital disease.

The risk of birth defects in the natural process was 5.8 per cent. In the IVF process it was 7.2 per cent and in vitrification it was 9.9 per cent. Malta, rightly, did not want embryo freezing. But then it was in favour of a system with higher risks. Was this ethically and morally acceptable to MPs? For him it wasn't.

Dr Vassallo said it was understandable that couples would do everything to have babies, but one had to see if the means were morally and ethically acceptable. To use such haphazard methods with a success rate of 30% while causing loss of life was unacceptable. 

He had been called a dinosaur by the liberals because he was a conservative, someone who wanted to conserve what was right in society, Dr Vassallo said. The liberals did not believe in anything. It was case of anything goes, they had no respect for others or for themselves. If he was a dinosaur  then the liberals were pigs.  (At this point the Acting Speaker objected to people being described as pigs. Dr Vassallo said he had been described as a dinosaur and therefore he was describing others as pigs. The Acting Speaker said the term dinosaur was not used in the House)

Continuing, Dr Vassallo said the liberals were accepting what in the past was considered unethical and immoral. They did not want rules and wanted everyone to do what he liked without anyone shouldering responsibility to others and to God.

He could not put his name on a Bill such as this, but he would back amendments which the Opposition planned to move, especially because it was unacceptable that people seeking IVF had to seek authorisation before a Regulatory authority.

Dr Vassallo concluded by thanking Opposition leader Joseph Muscat for letting him express his views.

He said he would now await the insults of the pigs, with pride. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advert

178 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 14:15

It is silly to generalize and condemn all leaders as despicable simply because they cause divisions. The greatest, meekest and most enduring of leaders, Christ, predicted that his teaching would provoke divisions even within families but that did not stop him from teaching God's truth.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:35

The Roman Catholic Church has fought in many countries for human rights and freedom of speech. So please spare me any comments which try to depict Liberals as some sort of saviors. On the contrary; where conservatives fight for life, liberal fight for death. Where conservatives fight against vices, liberals fight in favor of people taking drugs!! Liberals in other words are nothing but anarchists!

G. Cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 13:22

Precisely what i meant,angry knee jerk reactions. If your argument was logical it would have been church hierarchy calling people in favour of IVF pigs.
It would be surprising for some that liberal, progressive minded people exist within most institutions including the church. If everyone within religious groups was in agreement with the orthodoxy, we would have been spared the enlightenment.

Peter Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 13:53

Proud to be a pig........honk, honk.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:07

Obviously since you disagree with him you want him to resign. Who cares that there are so many others that share his opinion!! Typical Liberal!!

Eddy Privitera

Nov 13th 2012, 17:50

D. Gatt: Adrian Vassallo has ridiculed only himself, not his party. Indeed, in GonziPN there are many more who agree with his views than in the PL !

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:08

When something is for the good then yes it should be accepted and embraced. When something is for the bad, and indeed involves the systematic creation of life simply to terminate it then no, it is not acceptable and should be fought against!!

Peter Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 13:51

They would not. Its not like being in a supermarket

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 11:19

Because it is in man's nature to say - I'm OK so screw you jack. Especially amongst conservatives.

D Gatt

Nov 13th 2012, 11:28

Could not agree more.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:45

@Robert Agius
Indeed it is the other way round; LIBERALS never care about others; LIBERAL ONLY CARE ABOUT WHAT THEY WANT NOW!! They do not care about the future, they do not care about others!! For example IVF ... they see only the rights of the couple that want a child but don't care about the rights of the unborn child.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:49

@Robert Agius
Conservatives on the other see the hardship of couples that cannot have children through the natural process, and ant to give them REAL OPTIONS, rather then one that forces them to select DEATH in order to have LIFE. They want REAL OPTIONS for EVERYONE so that someone who has faith will not have to go against his this in order to have a child!! That is REAL PROGRESS!!

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 15:41

Real option you yourself don't have to choose that is to say.....

To be honest, neither of most issues attacked by conservatives has any effect on me personally. Who is speaking for other here. Me? or you? Who is forcing YOU into anything. You have YOUR beliefs, you are FREE to stick to them. On the other hand, YOU are telling others what the 'real' options are(those that please you).

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Nov 13th 2012, 14:21

I also remember Franco Debono, JPO, Cyrus Engerer, etc etc. Political parties are all the same - whether made up of pigs or dinosaurs or a mix of both.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 10:31

"Dr Vassallo concluded by thanking Opposition leader Joseph Muscat for letting him express his views." - I think that implies he does not consider him as so.

C Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 10:38

@aquilina

Lets use some logic here:

Joseph Muscat availed himself of IVF.
Adrian Vassallo considers those in favour of IVF as Liberal Pigs.

Ergo Joseph Muscat = Liberal Pig (* Dr. Vassallo's words not mine)

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:10

@C Agius
Ergo you are wrong. He considers liberals as pigs, not those in favor of IVF. He has his reservation on IVF and is against liberals who want this tool of potential good into a tool of murder.

Luke Lanzon

Nov 13th 2012, 10:33

No us liberals believe that every human is equal and so should be treated with equal rights, on the other hand you conservatives think that only the chosen few have rights, and those rights are chosen by the guy you believe is up there.

E Schembri

Nov 13th 2012, 11:19

@ Luke Lanzon

On the other hand conservatives respect nature and its ways, defends the moral fiber of society which is the family made up of FATHER, MOTHER and CHILDREN.
We protect unborn children, and promote stable relationships within marriage to ensure the right of every child to be brought up in a natural family.

Conservatives truly fight for human rights!

Luke Lanzon

Nov 13th 2012, 12:11

@ E. Schembri

Nope those are not human rights!!! Those are rights according to your bible, and as I said, are only chosen by the guy you think controls us like puppets.

Mr l Azzopardi

Nov 13th 2012, 10:18

if you are not aware of international medical studies its not our fault Hossam!

Hossam Helwani

Nov 13th 2012, 10:51

mr i azzopardi
I am aware of international medical studies and I am also aware of their shortcomings. I am aware also that your comment is highly imprudent.

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 11:22

As you are aware of you personal convictions Hossam Helwani.

Mr l Azzopardi

Nov 13th 2012, 12:23

I would so love to reach the level of intensity and competence you have reached on this topic... but then again you are also an expert on social security, MEPs, Mintoff, Joseph Muscat, housing, the PN and hurricane sandy!!

Sure you are not out of your depth here Sir?

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 09:16

Clearly you missed out what politics and political parties are all about!! Why do you think we call them "Socialists", "Nationalists", or "Liberals" ... come one take a wild guess ... oh can't manage?? ... let me help you ... BECAUSE THEY ARE A GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT SHARE THE SAME OPINION ON HOW THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE MANAGED!! To say "They are not there to give us their opinion" is nonsense!!

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 11:13

@ Joseph Aquilina,

And having said. Having only two major parties should be ample evidence of the intellectual poverty the island is infected with. Not to mention the charade of 'democracy'. It's but a huge marketing campaign. now tell me, where to morals lie in marketing campaigns?












Answer: $

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:15

@Robert Agius
The United States has a defacto two party system as well, and they are considered as the best democracy; the reason is very simple; it is not the quantity of parties, but how the different organ of the states work together.

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 15:45

HAAHAHAHAHAAH... U.S..... best democracy?!?!?! ahahahahahah. Best to shove democracy down other nations throats by a few elite you mean.

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 09:11

That's your choice but you cannot deny Dr. Vassallo his choice

matthew tanti

Nov 13th 2012, 10:01

jaghmel hu

Steve Abela

Nov 13th 2012, 08:51

The problem with Dr Vassallo is as you said above he was elected by the people so he must see what is the need of the people who elected him not bringing his believes before the needs of the people he represent.

Ryan Scicluna

Nov 13th 2012, 08:59

Better ask permission then become a renegade wild card which divided a party. He only asked permission. He was not asked to agree with the party at all costs. Maybe you should think about that before casting your vote.

E Schembri

Nov 13th 2012, 11:40

@Steve Abela.

You are wrong, it is the other way round.

He has his OWN PERSONAL principals and beliefs and was elected by the people to promote them.

If the people don't agree with him, DON'T elect him.

But you cannot expect to elect someone to do as the 2000 people who elected him want as that would mean 2000 different opinions.

Mr Andrew Camilleri

Nov 13th 2012, 14:25

Briffa: please read properly. Vassallo 'asked' for permission - he did not have to obtain permission. There is a huge difference there. So stop spinning please or learn to read properly.

John Borg

Nov 13th 2012, 09:14

Agreed

Joseph John Camilleri

Nov 13th 2012, 09:54

Yes what the hell is wrong with US all. When we want to play God everything turns in its head. That's the trouble with the world today. Everybody wants to talk about rights, be it divorce, cohabitation, gays same sex marriage etc and we forget Gods plans in his creation. What God said 2000 or more years ago is still valid today because He is yesterday, today and tomorrow.

Joe Fenech

Nov 13th 2012, 23:08

So God - that almighty force - was around 2000 years ago? Interesting!

What does IVF have to do with gay marriage? So, when you have a tooth problem, do you just leave it be so you don't play with nature??????

Brian Gatt

Nov 13th 2012, 09:06

PL's basis are Christian, however being a Democratic Political Party it accepts the fact that there are other people with different creeds, religions and even sexual orientations. In Malta the community has changed. Not everyone is Catholic and married. PL simply accepted that fact and is acting accordingly. PL looks at Diversity as a positive treat in the community

m. borg (slm)

Nov 13th 2012, 11:09

I thought with the divorce the repercussions were immediate as you holier-than-thou people wanted us to believe, now it is ".... in the years to come"?

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 12:18

@m. borg (slm)
Go to any country that implemented free-for-all divorce and you'll see the repercussions. We had a chance to implement something good and thanks to lejber we finished implementing the same mediocrity that you find in the rest of the world!!

jason cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 07:15

hehe ghalhekk qatt ma gejt elett int sur Emy !!

J Micallef

Nov 13th 2012, 07:27

Like!

Karl Consiglio

Nov 13th 2012, 15:04

I'm having it tattooed on my chest.

Brian Gatt

Nov 13th 2012, 09:13

So now you are branding people Dr Saliba...what next call back the Spanish Inquisition. I am personally against meddling with the nature however who am I to judge or impose on others who want or actually need to.
I cannot in clear conscience (even though like I said I am against meddling with nature) think that anyone should interfere with the chances of a couple to have Children.

Anthony Scicluna

Nov 13th 2012, 10:19

"NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry..." courtesy Monty Python

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 10:42

@BrianGatt
Stop twisting my written comment. I am not branding anybody. My comment is against hurling insults and branding by anybody, not selectively only in one direction. I do not ask you, nor do I ask anybody else, to judge or to impose on others. Again, it is you, not I, who are dragging in the Spanish Inquisition. Could you make the effort to be relevant and correct, please?

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 11:37

An 'auto da fé' against heretics and apostates (a.k.a. irreligious, humanists and secularists.)

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 14:23

@RobertAgius.
May I remind you, please, since you appear to be in a confusional state?
In this case the simulated auto de fe is being carried out by those take pride in being without "the faith" and actually by the prideful "irreligious, humanists and secularists"

Robert Agius

Nov 13th 2012, 15:49

Nope, you and your kind are free to take all the decisions, or lack thereof, you want. As far as I'm concerned, you may even burn the heretics within your own circle, as long as it leaves those who don't want to have anything to do with certain institutions in peace.

Hossam Helwani

Nov 13th 2012, 09:28

what is the big deal with porn? it is policies with real vision that is needed not porn! I am sure that you are not going to wait for porn legislation. What a waste of time commenting to such ridiculous and absurd contributions!

Karl Consiglio

Nov 13th 2012, 14:16

Simple yes or no answer please

David Caruana

Nov 13th 2012, 07:58

At least pigs are still with us and very much needed for nutrition .

Dinosaurs, on the other hand, are extinct - a thing of the past. The same will be said for the conservatives in a couple of generations.

Us pigs will make sure that social conservatism gets its place in the history books, sooner rather than later.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 08:46

@David Caruana.
You "pigs" (as per your admission only) should not waste time insulting opponents as "dinosaurs", provoking a retaliatory "pigs". Better to devote your time to the failed attempt to consign "social conservatism" (meaning Christian morality) to the history books because after two millennia there is no sign of the campaign succeeding. What results is Christ's promise of permanence.

Mr.W Cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 09:14

Wouldn't your time be better suited to the perusal of proof that there is a god? Francis

Since there is still is no proof he exists.

Hossam Helwani

Nov 13th 2012, 09:34

@ david caruana
pigs will always be pigs and I think morality is much needed in a society like ours where an eerie new breed of society is looming. Society without values takes our lives back to the dark ages where no one is safe. It is important to respect human dignity. Pigs will never be any better even if they wear perfumes and it is imperative we live the life of humanity than pigs.

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 10:50

@WCassar.
I am completely satisfied through my faith and my reasoning powers that God exists. I do not need more proof and therefore I do not need to follow your gratuitous and irrelevant advice. My wisdom is different from your "wisdom" and I do not intend to exchange it with yours.

David Caruana

Nov 13th 2012, 10:54

Dottore, I was referring to social conservatism, why are you putting Christianity in the middle of this?

I know of many Christians who agree with same-sex marriage and who believe that life does not begin at conception.

You might call them 'bad Christians', but then again, who are you to say that you are not the bad one after all?

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 14:32

@David Caruana.
I did not call anyone "bad Christian" so why the malicious insinuation that I might call them so?

Mr.W Cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 07:44

100% agree...

Francis Saliba M.D.

Nov 13th 2012, 08:55

If "ad hominem" insults could ever replace logical arguments then it would be possible to "100% agree" with Bernard Mallia. But insults do not persuade any intelligent human being who actually uses his brain rather than crude base emotional outbursts.

J Micallef

Nov 13th 2012, 07:34

Henry S Pace, please note your God is a different one from mine.

Matthew Grima

Nov 13th 2012, 09:33

God is an unknown entity that has no place in our state issues.

If you're so against what seems unnatural... stop using medicine and do not seek medical help when under the weather.

Franco Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 22:22

To speak your opinion, is a right. But for a member of parliament to insult Maltese citizens ... is quite another thing. It is disgusting, despicable and downright scandalous! There is no difference between Pn and Pl in the shameless way they harbour zealots within them!

Kenneth Cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 07:09

It is always funny when someone complains that others do not give a person the right to speak...beneath a whole article that does just that.

Matthew Grima

Nov 13th 2012, 09:32

Everyone is able to speak their opinion. Everyone is also able to criticize and ridicule certain opinion. What's wrong with that?

Franco Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 22:24

Iva? Taqbel ukoll mal-fatt li jghajjar lil Maltin hutu 'hniezer'? Eh? Tapprovah dan il-kliem? X'fih 'onorevoli' dan il-pezza ta' bniedem? Tahseb int li qed jimpressjona lil xi hadd jew lil Alla li halqu li qed jghajjar lil hutu bnedmin 'hniezer'?

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 05:55

Why a shame? Why can't you accept clear natural thinking? Why does it hurt you? Is the world getting better results with liberalism? All we see is mayhem all around us, everywhere we look.

Franco Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 22:26

Does he also have a right, as a member of parliament, to call fellow Maltese citizens 'pigs'? Don't you think it is donwright shameful? Or just because you feel you are not one of the 'pigs', it's ok? Is that the extent of your decency?
I don't think that Vassallo is in any way showing love for democracy, because in calling 'pigs' those who do not agree with him, he is trying to shut ppl up.

Bernard Pollacco

Nov 13th 2012, 21:20

@franco

fair point, however it does not mean he can't speak his mind...

John Grima

Nov 12th 2012, 23:02

likewise it takes one dinosaur to know another

Jesmond Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 23:30

Aren't you a dinosaur?

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 05:57

That's your problem

Jo Meli

Nov 12th 2012, 23:47

Oink Oink !

Peter Bonnici

Nov 13th 2012, 00:17

And of course, you fail to see the contradiction?

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 05:58

Don't stray from the subject: what is your opinion on IVF?

G G Debono

Nov 12th 2012, 21:51

OK so treament of meningitis with antibiotics goes against nature too ?

Just let them die - ----- and just let childless couples remain childless and long for children till thir dying day.

All this for out-dated "principles" based on religion or backward thinking.

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 13th 2012, 00:04

So is flying in an aeorplane against nature. If God wanted us to fly, he, she or it would have given us wings. Is that not your submission?

Kenneth Cassar

Nov 13th 2012, 07:05

All medicine is "against nature".

Matthew Grima

Nov 13th 2012, 09:30

Please refrain from using reason to correct M Borg. It's useless :)

Karl Consiglio

Nov 13th 2012, 14:57

You cannot go against nature, because when you do, go against nature, that's part of nature too.

Jesmond Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 22:19

Miss Dabrowicz:

May I remind you that the Hon Dr Vassallo is acting within the law by expressing his disgust in parliament, at the disparaging comments made by Cecilia WIKSTRÖM in the name of the Alliance of Liberals & Democrats for Europe and the Swedish Folkpartiet liberalerna on national television in Sweden.

Jesmond Farrugia

Nov 12th 2012, 22:21

....As a seasoned advocate of abortion, WIKSTRÖM will have been well aware that abortion is a criminal offence here, punishable under all circumstances.

John Grima

Nov 12th 2012, 22:58

If you want to live in a normal way then have babies in the normal way not by using IVF

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 06:03

What's normal civilised way to you, this mayhem that you call modern liberal society, that is incapable to shoulder responsibility and thus succumbs to escapism: how sustainable is this mayhem?

jesmond zammit

Nov 12th 2012, 21:43

f moviment l ideat jista jkunu ma jaqblux radikalment imma l ghan ikun wiehed.

Mr Evan Camilleri

Nov 12th 2012, 22:11

I hope not! Just like the PN needs to accept liberals, the MLP must embrace conservatives! Then we will truly build an inclusive society!

Or an inclusive society is one which is monopolistic by liberals and their ideas?

S. Vella

Nov 12th 2012, 23:23

@Jesmond Zammit

This is not a movement but a political party. You can't have the PL calling itself Progressivi, moderati u liberali in one breath and a Labour MP branding the PL itself as 'hniezer'.

This is ludicrous beyond belief.

Jesmond Farrugia

Nov 13th 2012, 07:58

Well said Evan.

Joseph Aquilina

Nov 13th 2012, 10:23

@Mr Evan Camilleri
Lejber and the word "embrace" never went hand in hand!!

Mr Joseph Carmel Chetcuti

Nov 13th 2012, 00:01

'Almost' should read 'aways'.

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 06:06

I think you are mistaken: the people voting for the IVF law are telling us what to do and how to organise our lives. Just like JPO did with the divorce law.

Patrick Zammit

Nov 13th 2012, 07:52

J Sammut

Pigs are not forcing you to undergo IVF or divorce.

However Dinosaurs, want legislation to impose their views on others as they have always done throughout history.

Joseph Sammut

Nov 13th 2012, 06:09

Dr. Vassallo does not call himself a dinosaur; others that can't bear to listen to reason do so. That's their opinion of course, which cannot be taken as correct.

Mary Pace

Nov 12th 2012, 21:20

I second you Ruben, Dr. Vassallo is the only one who is regarding the welfare of the unborn child. Even if all go against you do not let them stop you from expressing your concerns Dinosaurs are extinct but still regarded as the mightiest creatures that ever roamed the Earth.

Mr T Zahra

Nov 13th 2012, 06:42

Dinosaurs were also the least intelligent....Adrian Vassallo you have the right to your opinion, but to insult your own electorate and call them pigs is unacceptable...you must be spending too much time with Franco...it seems to be rubbing off.

Advert
Advert