Woman’s human rights breached in land case
A woman has been awarded €50,000 in damages by the European Court of Human Rights which found that her right to enjoyment of property had been violated after the Government failed to compensate her for land expropriated 37 years ago.
Victoria Vassallo filed her claim against the Government before the court in 2009.
She told the court that she owned one-eleventh of land which had been expropriated by the Government in 1974, at a time when the land was deemed to be agricultural.
No use had been made of the land by the authorities for 28 years and Ms Vassallo had not received any compensation for the expropriation.
An offer of compensation was made by the Government in 1999. But Ms Vassallo said that she ought to be compensated for the present day value of the land and not the value at the time of the expropriation. Her architect valued the land at between €1,281,155 and €1,397,624 while the government submitted that the land was worth €47,400.
In its judgment the European Court said the difference in the two valuations was striking, for Ms Vassallo’s architect had valued the land at sixteen times more that the Government’s architect.
Given this discrepancy the court ruled that little value could be placed on what appeared to be subjective valuations unaccompanied by any detailed reports.
The court found that the expropriation of the land was not unlawful. It was the fact that the expropriated land had remained unused for 28 years and that Ms Vassallo had not received any compensation for the expropriation of the property after 37 years had elapsed that was at the origin of the violation of Ms Vassallo’s fundamental human right to enjoyment of property.
The court found in favour of Ms Vassallo and awarded her €50,000 in damages.
The court added that in assessing the amount of compensation it had considered information available to it on land values on the Maltese property market today.
Lawyers José Herrera and David Camilleri appeared for Ms Vassallo.
14 Comments
Post comment
Please sign in or create your Account to post comments.
Peter Murray
Nov 12th 2012, 21:24
Why is this highlighted as a Woman's Human Rights issue when it is patently a generic issue irrespective of gender.
Maria Vassallo
Nov 12th 2012, 16:21
1975: The year the MLP was in power!
There are more cases where maltese citizens were robbed of their property because of expropriation.
C Cassar
Nov 12th 2012, 12:31
So, this compensation will come from the pockets of all Maltese tax payers.
JIMMY ATANASIO
Nov 12th 2012, 13:31
what ever thee goverment does money spent usually comes from tax payers.what do you think that they pay it from their own pocket?never happaens
GL Calleja
Nov 12th 2012, 15:18
The government taketh away and the government must giveth back.The government has no right to requisition private property without compensation to the owner. My father's property was confiscated in 1974 to accommodate one of their constituents who still resides there up to this day. Because of our archaic Iaws I cannot evict these squatters up to this day. Even the government is not above the law
C Cassar
Nov 12th 2012, 12:31
So, this compensation will come from the pockets of all Maltese tax payers.
Joseph E Briffa
Nov 12th 2012, 14:26
Where else, C Cassar? From the members of the Labour administration that expropriated the land in 1974?
Peter Murray
Nov 12th 2012, 21:26
good point and no one will face the consequences either of such blatant arrogance and inept incompetence
Michael Borg
Nov 12th 2012, 12:17
was not time barred ???
victor bonello
Nov 12th 2012, 11:27
I wonder if the Government architects use the same measuring stick when evaluating what the Government is due to pay for expropriations and what succession taxes are to be paid by the common people to Government..
M. Attard
Nov 12th 2012, 10:12
not 16 times but 26 times more (1,281,551 / 47,400) but i guess its just a misprint.
Joseph E Briffa
Nov 12th 2012, 09:51
So the local authorities were proved right when they assessed the value of the land at Eur47 000 in 1999.. Had the victim of the 1974 expropriation taken up the offer of Eur47 000 in 1999, and invested the amount in a 5% coupon, she would be better off by Eur78 000 today, and that at simple interest. At compund interest it would Eur88 000, and legal fees saved.
ANTHONY PAVIA
Nov 12th 2012, 11:39
Completely wrong. This award is only for damages. Consideration would still have to be agreed and settled.
Many thanks go to the hapless civil service, and fellow inept politicians that have awarded this "bomba" to Malta's taxpayers. All that is needed are some similar judgements for our national debt to balloon some more. All thanks to the Public sector and their laissez faire attitude.
Pauline Peterson
Nov 12th 2012, 12:27
We can all be wise AFTER the fact :-)
Please choose the reason of your report below: