Advert

Passengers and their pets

Yet another feature of incompetence by the Arriva drivers was displayed on November 7 when a driver of 106 bus in Lija did not allow me onboard because of my dog!

I have seen this happening with other passengers too as many drivers are unaware of the rules allowing pets on board. People are consistently being refused to board a bus because of a dog.

This is simply ignorance on the drivers’ part and is against Arriva rules because their regulations state that pets are allowed on board.

It is no proper excuse to portray this kind of ignorance or show pure selfishness if the driver does not happen to like dogs. Arriva should make all drivers aware that pets are allowed; we are living in the 21st century, after all. If my pets have flown with me all around the world and stayed in the best hotels, then it is ridiculous not to allow them on a bus in Malta.

Advert

20 Comments

Post comment

Please see our new Comments Policy

Comments are submitted under the express understanding and condition that the editor may, and is authorised to, disclose any/all of the above personal information to any person or entity requesting the information for the purposes of legal action on grounds that such person or entity is aggrieved by any comment so submitted.

At this time your comment will not be displayed immediately upon posting. Please allow some time for your comment to be moderated before it is displayed.

For more details please see our Comments Policy

Your User Profile is incomplete.
Please click here to complete your profile before posting comments.

Anthony Borg

Nov 12th 2012, 16:27

Mr. Zammit comment makes much more sense, Mr. Franco Farrugia

Peter Murray

Nov 12th 2012, 18:00

Nice one Kenny

Pippo de Marco

Nov 13th 2012, 08:27

Oh Kenny, what have you done ?

The Ministry is going to be flooded with Maltese Terrier owners demanding Doggy ID cards so that they can pay cheaper bus fares. Worse still for the government, it will shortly have yet another discrimination case to answer in the EU.

Nice one, Austin. Well thought out :-))

paul camilleri

Nov 12th 2012, 13:34

Mr Farrugia , apparently you sir need to do some reserch as the comments i made were taken out of Arriva Web site concerning animals. and if they are copiying airmalta then i say to you sir that why people need to take pets on holiday is beyond me!and are better off donating the fair money to animal wellfair.

Anthony Borg

Nov 12th 2012, 13:49

No, I will not weigh my words well as you put it.
I am not aware of Arriva's rules when boarding a bus with pets, but I will definitely not allow someone to sit next to me with an animal.

We leave our Irish setter and budgie at home, not take them for a bus a ride. If we need the vet, we use our car.

Pippo de Marco

Nov 12th 2012, 15:48

My thoughts exactly, Paul. But you beat me to the keyboard :)

Perhaps Arriva could commission some new triple-bendy buses with a pet car at the rear ?

Or just maybe the dog could be left at home ? - And if it can't be left alone, then it shouldn't be on a bus.

paul camilleri

Nov 13th 2012, 10:16

simple Murrey, the owner of the dog probably had a normal pet , uncaged and perhaps even barking at the driver!!! besides if i travelled the world as she claims with her pet what i find disgusting is that she did not donate the money to animal welfare instead of spending it on her pets holiday? i always thought dog owners were suppose to walk and exercise their dogs not take them for a bus ride!

Peter Murray

Nov 12th 2012, 11:59

I agree that the correspondent may not have done enough thorough research- but have you?As even though the lady never mentioned it you appear to automatically assume that the type of dog actually allowed was NOT the type she might have been compelled to possess-as in a special assistance dog- with the special assistance possibly not readily evident to the driver-did he ask this question?

paul camilleri

Nov 12th 2012, 13:38

all i can say to Mr Murrey is that it is obvious the woman did not have her pet locked up in a cage or the driver would of accepted it, again if the dog looked vicious although in the cage the driver has the right to refuse it. should of the dog been of special aid to the person again while taking the time to write the letter she would of stated such giving her argument more force.

JIMMY ATANASIO

Nov 12th 2012, 13:52

what about the people that are alergic to animals.are they supposed to ignore them and to hell with them.i say no to animals on publc transportation.some seeing eye dogs yes but you can't start giving way to everybody

Advert
Advert